Re: Sprint PCS FAQ Version 1. It's a work in progess. Nothing is verified. Message to the thread

"Bob Smith" <usirsclt_No_Spam_@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Pu93c.10302$%06.7284@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net...
>
> "Christopher F" <tamborero@nyc.rr.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:w693c.13624$c73.3546883@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> <snipped>
> >
> > Judging by all those baby noises, perhaps a pacifier and a coloring book
> is
> > what you need.
> >
> > >One whole post by you in this newsgroup,
> >
> > No, I've posted multiple times to this newsgroup over the last two
> years --
> > that said, who cares? Does the frequency of posting somehow make my
> > observation any more or less valid?
>
> No, it doesn't, but you haven't posted here before, at least not under
> Christopher F or by tamborero, as Google will show.

And as Google shows, not only are you an asshole, you're also an ignoramus
who can't use a Google search engine properly.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ta...PAM.com&rnum=1

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ogle.com#link1

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...0nyc.rr.NOSPAM
.com#link15

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...com%26rnum%3D5

Need more, Bobby old boy?



> So, are you telling us
> now that you are pulling a Phillipe, by posting under different IDs?

No. I'm telling you you're ostensibly an asshole AND an ignoramus. And
I'll expect a retraction of your _LIES_ about never posting here, and your
libelous suggestion that I'm using sockpuppets right here ----------->


> > > and you
> > > know me that well?
> >
> > Never claimed I do. I simply stated my "asshole" assessment based on
your
> > "asshole-like" remark to the Supreme Enchanter for trying to so
something
> > for the benefit of us all. Obviously his FAQ isn't perfect, and he
never
> > claimed it was. IMO, the nice person looks through the whole thing and
> > offers specific advice on how to improve it, an asshole "gives up
reading
> it
> > as it was so unorganized" and commands that the author "go through the
> > amended draft 3 or 4 times before you post it here again."
>
> I offered advice and even apologized to him that I came on too strong ...
> and you continue this argument?

The advice was arrogant (asshole like) and came mostly _after_ I and others
pointed it out. That's not called being nice, that's called an
after-the-fact cover up.

> >
> > Quite honestly Bob, who the **** are you?
>
> Obviously not the jerk that you are ...

Frankly your opinion of me means little to me, particularly considering the
condescending attitude you show others posters here regularly. It's
exceedingly clear now that you can dish it out, but you just can't take it.
Grow up.