1900 MHz CDMA/TDMA/GSM indoor repeater

Robert M. wrote:
> P.S. There is no VoiceStream, perhaps you mean T-Mobile.

No..I know EXACTLY what I mean. Do YOU?

www.voicestream.com

---

› See More: 1900 MHz CDMA/TDMA/GSM indoor repeater

Robert M. wrote:

> It's all true, dont try to make up another lie. All SprintPCS stores have
> repeaters. SECRET repeaters.

And Brian Baker wears a black trenchcoat, PROOF he visits Sprint PCS
stores in a black helicopter.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> > > Sprint tells potential customers:
> > >
> > > "Performance of phones in our stores may not reflect real world
> > > conditions because we have a hidden repeater in the ceiling that most
> > > likely will improve performance" ?
> > >
> > > They don't. it's a SECRET.
> > >
> >
> > They don't? They don't what? First you say they tell customers
> > this, then you say they don't?
> >
> > At least stick to the same story, if you're going to make one up like
> > this.
>
> It's all true, dont try to make up another lie. All SprintPCS stores have
> repeaters. SECRET repeaters.

It's no secret ... you little immature silly boy. That's why they give a 14
day trial period to see whether the phone and the service will fit the
customer's needs.

Bob

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> It's all true, dont try to make up another lie. All SprintPCS stores have
> repeaters. SECRET repeaters.

And stereo stores construct special 'listening rooms' to enhance the sound
quality of their products, Best Buy uses digital channels to enhance the
picture quallity of their televisions, and computer stores use commercial
broadband connections to demonstrate their computers. None of these
represent 'real life' conditions for the great majority of the buying
public, but I don't see you *****ing about this.

Using 'ideal' conditions to demonstrate products is nothing new, not
deceptive and is done by all. Get over it.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>
> P.S. There is no VoiceStream, perhaps you mean T-Mobile.

For a non-existent entity, VoiceStream certainly controls a great
number of PCS licences. To randomly name but a few:

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...sp?licKey=8901
(KNLF224)
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...sp?licKey=8902
(KNLF225)
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...sp?licKey=8904
(KNLF227)
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10168
(KNLG799)

I suppose next you will say that there is no Omnipoint or Powertel
either...

Andrew
--
Andrew Shepherd
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.ku.edu/home/cinema/

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

> Don't forget, he did go to AT&T wireless, then came crawling back top Sprint.

I have continuously been a customer of SprintPCS since 1999, and
have NEVER been a customer of AT&T Wireless.

Why do you post such lies?

To try to divert attention from Sprint"s

1. Secretly putting repeaters in stores.
2. Refusing to honor warranties
3. Having secret list of phones that will be replaced if one complains
4. having secret retention policies for their Cancellation dept.
5. Repeatingly by multiple surveys being rated WORST in
customer service.


Too bad you are so insecure in your job you need to come here and lie
and coverup Sprint's defeciencies.

In article <[email protected]>,
JRW <no_addy@no_.com> wrote:

> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > It's all true, dont try to make up another lie. All SprintPCS stores have
> > repeaters. SECRET repeaters.
>
> And Brian Baker wears a black trenchcoat, PROOF he visits Sprint PCS
> stores in a black helicopter.


Go ahead dissemble. Why do these blind SprintPCS apologists
need to coverup for SprintPCS, are they that insecure?

Scott Stephenson wrote:
> Best Buy uses digital channels to enhance the
> picture quallity of their televisions

Reminds me of a cartoon about twenty years ago.

You're looking in the front window of a TV store and the salesman
is telling the customer that reception is poor because the TV
is inside a building, but you can see a tower with a monster
TV antenna feeding to the TV.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
>
> > Don't forget, he did go to AT&T wireless, then came crawling back top
Sprint.
>
> I have continuously been a customer of SprintPCS since 1999, and
> have NEVER been a customer of AT&T Wireless.
>
> Why do you post such lies?
>
> To try to divert attention from Sprint"s
>
> 1. Secretly putting repeaters in stores.
> 2. Refusing to honor warranties
> 3. Having secret list of phones that will be replaced if one complains
> 4. having secret retention policies for their Cancellation dept.
> 5. Repeatingly by multiple surveys being rated WORST in
> customer service.
>
>
> Too bad you are so insecure in your job you need to come here and lie
> and coverup Sprint's defeciencies.

Oh, see my prior post, and then read this google link from another thread
http://tinyurl.com/3d2mp . Phillipe, stop lying ...

Bob

On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 14:31:25 GMT, "Robert M." <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>>
>> >A lucid explanation is here:
>> >
>> >http://nordicgroup.us/ssub/cellpcs.htm
>>
>> The explanation is not lucid, it's very terse and oversimplified.
>
>The shortness is what makes it understandable.
>
>Or are you objecting because it demonstrates the 1900MHz that SprintPCS
>uses does not penetrate buildings as well as the 800 MHz Verizon uses.
>
>http://nordicgroup.us/ssub/cellpcs.htm

How does one defend these statements in the web site?

(higher you go, radio waves begin to become very directional, and are
attenuated by environmental factors),

I'll leave you to answer how they become "very directional". Above 6
GHz, environmental factors certainly hold. Can you, Robert M., tell
me what's magic about 6 GHz?

So, I see two problems with the explanation, already.

Further down we see:

PCS phones are the most fragile because they use higher frequencies
whose radio waves are more easily disturbed

Goodness! What in the world do they mean?

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> Goodness! What in the world do they mean?

Try reading

http://nordicgroup.us/ssub/cellpcs.htm

Meanwhile it just proves what you have no URL for disproving the fact.

1900 MHz PCS cells have poorer building penetration (read SprintPCS)
than 800 MHz (read Verizon).

Robert M. wrote:

> 1900 MHz PCS cells have poorer building penetration (read SprintPCS)
> than 800 MHz (read Verizon).

Hence more cells for 1900 Mhz carriers to eliminate any problems.

So what is your point?

In article <[email protected]>,
JRW <no_addy@no_.com> wrote:

> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > 1900 MHz PCS cells have poorer building penetration (read SprintPCS)
> > than 800 MHz (read Verizon).
>
> Hence more cells for 1900 Mhz carriers to eliminate any problems.
>
> So what is your point?

SprintPCS doesn't always have that sufficient number. And SprintPCS
still (despite the "Consumer Code" doesnt have a map showing coverage
other than inadequate 1" eqals hundreds of miles.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> SprintPCS doesn't always have that sufficient number. And SprintPCS
> still (despite the "Consumer Code" doesnt have a map showing coverage
> other than inadequate 1" eqals hundreds of miles.

The Consumer Code? The same Consumer Code that requests that carriers
provide APPROXIMATE coverage maps?

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 09:41:52 -0600, "Scott Stephenson"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>> SprintPCS doesn't always have that sufficient number. And SprintPCS
>> still (despite the "Consumer Code" doesnt have a map showing coverage
>> other than inadequate 1" eqals hundreds of miles.
>
>The Consumer Code? The same Consumer Code that requests that carriers
>provide APPROXIMATE coverage maps?
>

Robert,

You never did comment about the problems I posed that any carrier
would have producing an "exact" coverage map.

Why not?