Who is t-hunter?

A detailed Google search show the first ever post for that alias on
April 19, 2004.

Maybe he should be concerned with the quality of SprintPCS Customer
Service; rated worst repeatedly by

J.D. Power
The Yankeee Group
Consumer Reports.

---

› See More: Who is t-hunter?

Again with the re-post, troll troll.
You verify this every time you post the same tired stuff over and over.
We KNOW about the surveys , we KNOW the number to exec. service.
YOU chastised another person here for posting what had already been
addressed, yet you continue to the same.
All you do is prove over and over the fact that you are a troll, which
you admit by your actions.
This makes anything you post less than meaningless, it has been proven
repeatedly that you are a liar and and an instigator, you are disliked
in all the groups where you post, you are the internet equivalent of the
pesky fly.
You know this, admit it and take a sense of twisted pride in it.
No one here will take your word for anything, your post's are meaningless.
The shame of it is you can't see that.

Robert M. wrote:
> A detailed Google search show the first ever post for that alias on
> April 19, 2004.
>
> Maybe he should be concerned with the quality of SprintPCS Customer
> Service; rated worst repeatedly by
>
> J.D. Power
> The Yankeee Group
> Consumer Reports.

Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

--

John Richards

"t-hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Again with the re-post, troll troll.
[lengthy diatribe snipped]

Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

--

John Richards

"t-hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Again with the re-post, troll troll.
[lengthy diatribe snipped]

Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

--

John Richards

"t-hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Again with the re-post, troll troll.
[lengthy diatribe snipped]

Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

--

John Richards

"t-hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Again with the re-post, troll troll.
[lengthy diatribe snipped]

Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

--

John Richards

"t-hunter" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Again with the re-post, troll troll.
[lengthy diatribe snipped]

In article <[email protected]>,
"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

T-Hunter is feeding his own trolling.

In article <[email protected]>,
"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

T-Hunter is feeding his own trolling.

In article <[email protected]>,
"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

T-Hunter is feeding his own trolling.

In article <[email protected]>,
"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

T-Hunter is feeding his own trolling.

In article <[email protected]>,
"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

T-Hunter is feeding his own trolling.

John Richards wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

people imitating someone else are fools.
Phil is a twisted little chit isn't he ?

John Richards wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

people imitating someone else are fools.
Phil is a twisted little chit isn't he ?

John Richards wrote:

> Troll feeders are not much better than trolls.

people imitating someone else are fools.
Phil is a twisted little chit isn't he ?