Results 1 to 15 of 48
- 04-20-2004, 10:19 AM #1EricGuest
Hello,
I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
here?
Thanks,
Eric
› See More: Nokia 3588i impressions?
- 04-20-2004, 12:44 PM #2MeGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
[email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
3235.bay.webtv.net:
> Hello,
>
> I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
> Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
> secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
> hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
> I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
> pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
> here?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
the sweet spot
- 04-20-2004, 12:44 PM #3MeGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
[email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
3235.bay.webtv.net:
> Hello,
>
> I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
> Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
> secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
> hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
> I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
> pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
> here?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
the sweet spot
- 04-20-2004, 12:44 PM #4MeGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
[email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
3235.bay.webtv.net:
> Hello,
>
> I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
> Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
> secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
> hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
> I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
> pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
> here?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
the sweet spot
- 04-20-2004, 12:44 PM #5MeGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
[email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
3235.bay.webtv.net:
> Hello,
>
> I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
> Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
> secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
> hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
> I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
> pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
> here?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
the sweet spot
- 04-20-2004, 12:44 PM #6MeGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
[email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
3235.bay.webtv.net:
> Hello,
>
> I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
> Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
> secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
> hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
> I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
> pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
> here?
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
the sweet spot
- 04-20-2004, 01:26 PM #7Robert M.Guest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
In article <[email protected]>, Me <[email protected],>
wrote:
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
It's good for getting a signal, has a bright screen, is cheap (often
free), but these days most folks prefer flip-phones where the screen and
keyboard are protected when closed.
- 04-20-2004, 01:26 PM #8Robert M.Guest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
In article <[email protected]>, Me <[email protected],>
wrote:
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
It's good for getting a signal, has a bright screen, is cheap (often
free), but these days most folks prefer flip-phones where the screen and
keyboard are protected when closed.
- 04-20-2004, 01:26 PM #9Robert M.Guest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
In article <[email protected]>, Me <[email protected],>
wrote:
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
It's good for getting a signal, has a bright screen, is cheap (often
free), but these days most folks prefer flip-phones where the screen and
keyboard are protected when closed.
- 04-20-2004, 01:26 PM #10Robert M.Guest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
In article <[email protected]>, Me <[email protected],>
wrote:
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
It's good for getting a signal, has a bright screen, is cheap (often
free), but these days most folks prefer flip-phones where the screen and
keyboard are protected when closed.
- 04-20-2004, 01:26 PM #11Robert M.Guest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
In article <[email protected]>, Me <[email protected],>
wrote:
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
It's good for getting a signal, has a bright screen, is cheap (often
free), but these days most folks prefer flip-phones where the screen and
keyboard are protected when closed.
- 04-20-2004, 02:47 PM #12Jim CateroGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
Me wrote:
> [email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
> 3235.bay.webtv.net:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
>>Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
>>secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
>>hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
>>I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
>>pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
>>here?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Eric
>
>
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
Well,
from what I hear, and this is only 2nd hand so keep that in mind.
The 3588i isn't a really good phone, there have been problems with the
lock code on phones sent to customers, they don't do well on sms, and I
understand a lot of them have had to be returned under warranty.
again this is all 2nd hand, so ... but I haven't (that I remember)
heard anything good.
sorry
Jim
- 04-20-2004, 02:47 PM #13Jim CateroGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
Me wrote:
> [email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
> 3235.bay.webtv.net:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
>>Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
>>secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
>>hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
>>I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
>>pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
>>here?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Eric
>
>
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
Well,
from what I hear, and this is only 2nd hand so keep that in mind.
The 3588i isn't a really good phone, there have been problems with the
lock code on phones sent to customers, they don't do well on sms, and I
understand a lot of them have had to be returned under warranty.
again this is all 2nd hand, so ... but I haven't (that I remember)
heard anything good.
sorry
Jim
- 04-20-2004, 02:47 PM #14Jim CateroGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
Me wrote:
> [email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
> 3235.bay.webtv.net:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
>>Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
>>secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
>>hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
>>I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
>>pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
>>here?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Eric
>
>
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
Well,
from what I hear, and this is only 2nd hand so keep that in mind.
The 3588i isn't a really good phone, there have been problems with the
lock code on phones sent to customers, they don't do well on sms, and I
understand a lot of them have had to be returned under warranty.
again this is all 2nd hand, so ... but I haven't (that I remember)
heard anything good.
sorry
Jim
- 04-20-2004, 02:47 PM #15Jim CateroGuest
Re: Nokia 3588i impressions?
Me wrote:
> [email protected] (Eric) wrote in news:24089-40854D97-772@storefull-
> 3235.bay.webtv.net:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I recently added a new line of service on my account and opted for the
>>Nokia 3588i because I did not need any Vision bells and whistles on the
>>secondary line. What is the overall opinion of this phone? Does it
>>hold a signal well? Is it reliable as far as sms text messaging goes?
>>I know it is a free phone, and someone once told me that I get what I
>>pay for (meaning a freebie is of much lower quality)... does that apply
>>here?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Eric
>
>
> Don't use SIMMS but the phone is as good as any Sanyo in getting and
> keeping a signal and it sounds much better you do not have to search for
> the sweet spot
Well,
from what I hear, and this is only 2nd hand so keep that in mind.
The 3588i isn't a really good phone, there have been problems with the
lock code on phones sent to customers, they don't do well on sms, and I
understand a lot of them have had to be returned under warranty.
again this is all 2nd hand, so ... but I haven't (that I remember)
heard anything good.
sorry
Jim
Phones Discussed Above
More Nokia 3586I / 3588I topics | Nokia Forum | Reviews |
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
- alt.cellular.nokia
Xbanking
in Chit Chat