Results 1 to 15 of 55
- 04-20-2004, 01:40 PM #1Robert M.Guest
http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
losses discussed earlier.
› See More: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
- 04-20-2004, 01:45 PM #2WraithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
Robert M. wrote:
> http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
>
> In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> losses discussed earlier.
And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
- 04-20-2004, 01:45 PM #3WraithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
Robert M. wrote:
> http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
>
> In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> losses discussed earlier.
And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
- 04-20-2004, 01:45 PM #4WraithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
Robert M. wrote:
> http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
>
> In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> losses discussed earlier.
And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
- 04-20-2004, 01:45 PM #5WraithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
Robert M. wrote:
> http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
>
> In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> losses discussed earlier.
And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
- 04-20-2004, 01:45 PM #6WraithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
Robert M. wrote:
> http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
>
> In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> losses discussed earlier.
And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
- 04-20-2004, 01:59 PM #7Bob SmithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
"Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group
?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
>
Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?
You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.
Bob
- 04-20-2004, 01:59 PM #8Bob SmithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
"Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group
?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
>
Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?
You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.
Bob
- 04-20-2004, 01:59 PM #9Bob SmithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
"Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group
?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
>
Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?
You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.
Bob
- 04-20-2004, 01:59 PM #10Bob SmithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
"Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group
?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
>
Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?
You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.
Bob
- 04-20-2004, 02:01 PM #11Robert M.Guest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
In article <[email protected]>,
Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
the truth.
And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?
Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.
If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
current churn rate could be calculated.
- 04-20-2004, 02:01 PM #12Robert M.Guest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
In article <[email protected]>,
Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
the truth.
And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?
Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.
If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
current churn rate could be calculated.
- 04-20-2004, 02:01 PM #13Robert M.Guest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
In article <[email protected]>,
Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
the truth.
And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?
Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.
If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
current churn rate could be calculated.
- 04-20-2004, 02:01 PM #14Robert M.Guest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
In article <[email protected]>,
Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> >
> > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
> > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
> > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > losses discussed earlier.
>
> And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
> This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
the truth.
And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?
Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.
If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
current churn rate could be calculated.
- 04-20-2004, 02:09 PM #15Bob SmithGuest
Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers
"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Robert M. wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
> > >
> > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
> > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing
up
> > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of
2,367,000+
> > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
> > > losses discussed earlier.
> >
> > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint
group ?
> > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
>
> Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
> the truth.
>
> And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?
Once again, more misstatements from Phillipe. He well knows full well that
Michael is up in the Seattle area, and yours truly is from Charlotte. This
poster, Wraith, outrider and t-hunter is from your state ... Dallas, TX to
be precise.
Bob ::who thinks Phillipe ... err, maybe I should just post the kill filter
list, should move his coverage to Verizon, as he loves their service and
coverage::
Apply this rule after the message arrives
Where the From line contains 'not John Rigas' or 'not at Adelphia' or
'Robert M.' or 'Cell Merger' or 'Rob M.' or 'Robert M.' or 'A.M.' or 'Al' or
'Alias for Smith' or 'Bernard Sharri' or 'BlueTooth Now' or 'Bob Veldrends'
or 'Camile Cardenas' or 'Carl70015' or 'Carlos Z.' or 'CAT0NHAT' or 'Chris
McFarland' or 'David' or 'Dennis' or 'Donald' or 'DSL GURU' or
'Enchanter999' or 'HK' or 'J. Range' or 'James' or 'James Tullin' or 'John
S.' or 'Jonathan' or 'Joseph' or 'Leonard' or 'LosAngelessLegal' or 'Loving
Moonlight' or 'Matthew Lindeen' or 'Michael' or 'Milton Searlis' or 'Monday
Cellphone' or 'not at Adelphia' or 'Not at Web TV' or 'P.' or 'P. Reality'
or 'Patrick Bosley' or 'PHil_Real' or 'Phill.' or 'Phillipe .' or
'Phillipe2004' or 'Posting Editor' or 'PTT ReadyLink' or 'Reginald' or
'Renaldo' or 'Retention' or 'Richard' or '[email protected]' or 'Robert' or
'Ronald' or 'Sanyo Guy' or 'Sarah Morlan' or 'Sergei Kosonov' or 'Sprint
Secrets' or 'Sprint Truth' or 'Sprintinator' or 'Sprintposter' or 'Stewart'
or 'Sunday Auto' or 'Thomas Aspland' or 'Tim Harrick' or 'Weekend Sunshine'
or 'William Bays'
Mark it as read
Bob
Similar Threads
- amp'd mobile
- amp'd mobile
- alt.cellular.verizon
What are the best ways to retain employees of your company?
in Chit Chat