Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    TechGeek
    Guest

    Re: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    >
    > Lauer bragged that SprintPCS would be a WLNP winner, so where are the
    > results? Why is SprintPCS sitting on the numbers? No wonder CALPARS
    > recommends voteing against Sprint's Director.


    All the companies said that, and before you start with the "just
    because they all did it, doesn't make it right", I don't see any
    complaints from you about all the other carriers.

    Now, he said that (like they all did) because it's their job to make
    the company appear it's doing very well (like all corp big-wigs like
    him). How good of a PR face would that have been if anyone has stood
    up and said "Hey, we're going to lose most of our subscribers".

    And acts like this are all over the place, how often do we hear GW
    Bush say "The economy is getting better and better" which I still have
    YET to see any improvement, I see the same jobs om Monster.com that I
    have been for the past few years, comission only sales, work at home
    etc.. I don't see it getting better.

    Just after Sept 11th (I do apologize for bringing up a sore subject,
    if it still is to anyone), top Wall Street analysts for CNN, MSNBC,
    FOX etc. were all saying "We expect the markets to shoot up, we're
    going to be buying like crazy" well, I don't need to remind us what
    happened to the markets in the weeks that followed.

    IN times of uncertainty, our leaders and figureheads try to put up an
    act of optomism. Why? They don't want us to panic. If any of the
    wireless CEOs or whatever said in mid-November 2003 that they expected
    to lose a lot with WLNP, I guarantee you that would make them lose a
    LOT more, the general public panic, and to prevent that, leaders put
    up an act of optomism.



    See More: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize




  2. #17
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

    > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:<[email protected]>...
    > >
    > > Lauer bragged that SprintPCS would be a WLNP winner, so where are the
    > > results? Why is SprintPCS sitting on the numbers? No wonder CALPARS
    > > recommends voteing against Sprint's Director.

    >
    > All the companies said that....


    AGAIN the lamest of apologies. Your parents let you use that when you
    were eight?

    They all did it too !!


    How many of the other companies that are losing money gave their CEO a
    bonus of 30x his annual salary ???



  3. #18
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize

    [email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
    <<AGAIN the lamest of apologies.>>

    Again, you are *so* predictable. Why does someone who complains about
    not being quoted properly, purposely pick out a partial sentence out of
    a much longer original post to quote, and completely ignore the rest of
    the story? You pick out a small phrase or sentence and latch onto that
    because it meets your needs, completely ignoring what ever else the
    original poster said.

    Here is the original, entire post by pcsguy that Phillipe ignored, only
    using the opening statement and ignoring the explanation.

    ----

    Group: alt.cellular.sprintpcs Date: Thu, Apr 22, 2004, 7:14pm (EST-2)
    From: [email protected] (TechGeek)

    All the companies said that, and before you start with the "just because
    they all did it, doesn't make it right", I don't see any complaints from
    you about all the other carriers.
    Now, he said that (like they all did) because it's their job to make the
    company appear it's doing very well (like all corp big-wigs like him).
    How good of a PR face would that have been if anyone has stood up and
    said "Hey, we're going to lose most of our subscribers".
    And acts like this are all over the place, how often do we hear GW Bush
    say "The economy is getting better and better" which I still have YET to
    see any improvement, I see the same jobs om Monster.com that I have been
    for the past few years, comission only sales, work at home etc.. I don't
    see it getting better.
    Just after Sept 11th (I do apologize for bringing up a sore subject, if
    it still is to anyone), top Wall Street analysts for CNN, MSNBC, FOX
    etc. were all saying "We expect the markets to shoot up, we're going to
    be buying like crazy" well, I don't need to remind us what happened to
    the markets in the weeks that followed.
    IN times of uncertainty, our leaders and figureheads try to put up an
    act of optomism. Why? They don't want us to panic. If any of the
    wireless CEOs or whatever said in mid-November 2003 that they expected
    to lose a lot with WLNP, I guarantee you that would make them lose a LOT
    more, the general public panic, and to prevent that, leaders put up an
    act of optomism.




  4. #19
    TechGeek
    Guest

    Re: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
    >
    > > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:<[email protected]>...
    > > >
    > > > Lauer bragged that SprintPCS would be a WLNP winner, so where are the
    > > > results? Why is SprintPCS sitting on the numbers? No wonder CALPARS
    > > > recommends voteing against Sprint's Director.

    > >
    > > All the companies said that....

    >
    > AGAIN the lamest of apologies. Your parents let you use that when you
    > were eight?
    >
    > They all did it too !!
    >
    >


    Again, my whole paragraph:

    > All the companies said that, and before you start with the "just
    > because they all did it, doesn't make it right", I don't see any
    > complaints from you about all the other carriers.


    I don't see you complaining about inaccurate coverage maps on all the
    other carriers, I don't see you in the other newsgroups about them
    losing money, I don't see you complaining that they all said they were
    going to be WLNP winners.

    So, you're also complaining that Sprint is only going after laptop
    tethered abusers, and not enforcing it 100%, then why aren't you doing
    the same with these issues? You say it's not right for them to do it,
    but you're only enforcing that with Sprint and AT&T.



  5. #20
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

    > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:<[email protected]>...
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
    > >
    > > > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:<[email protected]>...
    > > > >
    > > > > Lauer bragged that SprintPCS would be a WLNP winner, so where are the
    > > > > results? Why is SprintPCS sitting on the numbers? No wonder CALPARS
    > > > > recommends voteing against Sprint's Director.
    > > >
    > > > All the companies said that....

    > >
    > > AGAIN the lamest of apologies. Your parents let you use that when you
    > > were eight?
    > >
    > > They all did it too !!
    > >
    > >

    >
    > Again, my whole paragraph:
    >
    > > All the companies said that, and before you start with the "just
    > > because they all did it, doesn't make it right", I don't see any
    > > complaints from you about all the other carriers.

    >
    > I don't see you complaining about inaccurate coverage maps on all the
    > other carriers, I don't see you in the other newsgroups about them
    > losing money, I don't see you complaining that they all said they were
    > going to be WLNP winners.
    >
    > So, you're also complaining that Sprint is only going after laptop
    > tethered abusers, and not enforcing it 100%, then why aren't you doing
    > the same with these issues? You say it's not right for them to do it,
    > but you're only enforcing that with Sprint and AT&T.


    Sorry, SprintPCS keeps me busy enough with all its faux pas !



  6. #21
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Churn, Churn, Churn , apologize, apologize, apologize


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    <snipped>

    > Sorry, SprintPCS keeps me busy enough with all its faux pas !


    I thought it was you right hand ...

    Bob





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12