Is Mike a moron too?

In article <[email protected]>,
Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

> Chris Russell wrote:
>
> > They don't have anything called a National Plan you moron. Call it by it's
> > true name-Free & Clear America-the only true 'national' plan at SPCS.
> >
> > Chris
>
> Actually, these days Free & Clear America is an attachable option. Plans
> are either "Free & Clear Nationwide" or "Free & Clear Area-wide."
> If I guess correctly at what you're trying to achieve, you'd want to get
> a Free & Clear Nationwide plan, which has no roaming charges anywhere on
> the Sprint PCS Nationwide Network (built from the ground up....) and
> then attach a Free & Clear America option for either $5 or $10 to cover
> your off-network usage.

...

---

› See More: Is Mike a moron too?

Robert M. wrote:

> ..

Disappointing, incendiary, useless.
-mike

Great editing on your part to do nothing but cause trouble. Chris was
calling *you* Phillipe a moron... not Mike. Mike's post was in response
to his post calling you a moron.

And to think, you get upset when people "misquote" you.

Mike wrote:
<<Disappointing, incendiary, useless.
-mike>>

Not only that Mike, but Chris did not call *you* a moron, but rather
Phillipe/Robert M./Cell Merger a moron. The latter just edited the
posts together to make it seem otherwise... but misquoting and
misrepresentating is par for the course for him.

Eric wrote:

> Mike wrote:
> <<Disappointing, incendiary, useless.
> -mike>>
>
> Not only that Mike, but Chris did not call *you* a moron, but rather
> Phillipe/Robert M./Cell Merger a moron. The latter just edited the
> posts together to make it seem otherwise... but misquoting and
> misrepresentating is par for the course for him.
>

Insofar as I can tell, this was a bit of an odd compliment from Robert M.

"You said I was wrong, and a moron. Well, Mike disagrees with you too.
Are you saying he's a moron?"



-mike

Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.

If you're going to complain that others do it to you, then don't do it
yourself, if you do, you nullify your own complaint.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

> Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
> then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.

I did not insult soemone, I just pointed out that someone else qualified
for another's insults.

Too bad you cant see the total difference.

You just want to attack me, rather than improve SprintPCS.

The original post was calling you, Philippe a moron for calling the Free &
Clear America plan the National Plan. SPCS does not have any plan called
the National Plan-this was in reference to all you SPCS knowledge. If
you're pretending to be knowledgeable, make sure you know the correct
terminology. No offense was being directed at Mike, it was directed towards
you Philly.

Chris

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
>
> > Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
> > then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.
>
> I did not insult soemone, I just pointed out that someone else qualified
> for another's insults.
>
> Too bad you cant see the total difference.
>
> You just want to attack me, rather than improve SprintPCS.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
>
> > Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
> > then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.
>
> I did not insult soemone, I just pointed out that someone else qualified
> for another's insults.

Then what was this?:

"Does your mommy know you are using her computer??"


>
> Too bad you cant see the total difference.
>
> You just want to attack me, rather than improve SprintPCS.

Robert M. wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
>
>
>>Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
>>then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.
>
>
> I did not insult soemone, I just pointed out that someone else qualified
> for another's insults.
>
> Too bad you cant see the total difference.
>

So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
Seriously, if you keep this up dude you really will prove what others
say about . Think about it.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
>
> > Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
> > then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.
>
> I did not insult soemone, I just pointed out that someone else qualified
> for another's insults.
>
> Too bad you cant see the total difference.
>
> You just want to attack me, rather than improve SprintPCS.

How am I attacking you? You're the one who's posted insults in the
subject line, not me. It sounds more like you're attacking "Mike".

In article <[email protected]>,
"Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:

> The original post was calling you, a moron


We know, you call all too many people a moroon. I don't take it personal.

In article <[email protected]>,
r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?

There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
2nd grade when they taught about question marks.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
> >
> > > Quite interesting how you complain about people insulting you, but
> > > then you start threads with subject lines similar to this one.
> >
> > I did not insult soemone, I just pointed out that someone else qualified
> > for another's insults.
> >
> > Too bad you cant see the total difference.
> >
> > You just want to attack me, rather than improve SprintPCS.
>
> How am I attacking you? You're the one who's posted insults in the
> subject line, not me. It sounds more like you're attacking "Mike".

You get bent out of shape anytime I point out how posts from you and o
contradict, proving at least one of you doesn't know what they're
talking about.

Robert M. wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
>
>
> There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> 2nd grade when they taught about question marks.

Huh, so you don't insult people ?
All you had to do was point out the question mark if, like you say you
don't insult people and don't like people who do.
Man I hate to say it but maybe you really do deserve the rep. you have here.
At least you do a good job of trying to show you do.