Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28
  1. #16
    Jim Catero
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    Well phill you really did it this time.
    All that bull about not resting while others lie, all that crap about
    being the self proclaimed whistle blowing conscience of sprint.
    Now look at you, you do realize your credibility ( what little you may
    have had 0 is absolutely gone now don't you ?
    I hope you realize that this one is not going a way, you have a bulls
    eye so big on you now that I can see it from Oklahoma.
    I guarantee this, next time , or anytime now, you call someone a liar
    this will come back to haunt you.
    Your done.

    Jim




    See More: SAT scores.




  2. #17
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    In article <[email protected]>,
    r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
    > >>anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
    > >>http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
    > >>it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
    > >>which year did you kids take the SAT's?

    > >
    > >
    > > Wouldn't you like to know?

    >
    > Ok, NOW your caught, admit it or don't but you are.
    > This guy's right, sat's go by 10's.
    > What an immature response


    Nope, not caught at all. All you know is that it wasn't 2003.



  3. #18
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    In article <[email protected]>,
    r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Man I'm sorry but if that is the only thing you have to say in your
    > defense then that's pretty bad.
    > You can spout B.S. about me and 2nd grade if you want , but you are the
    > one still in kindergarten as far as your response goes.
    > Pathetic


    And that improves SprintPCS' rating for having worst customer service
    how?



  4. #19
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > And that improves SprintPCS' rating for having worst customer service
    > how?


    What does this thread have to do with SprintPCS and it's customer
    service rating? Again, another attempt by you at deflection [even if
    this whole thread is juvenile].

    - --

    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

    iD8DBQFAjled1p0e3NXsrtERArDqAJ9dnsj9mPvzwFc6NJpXT6shzxOevgCcCIrv
    v7EnXvtbsRSvfh1XB7wW0ZA=
    =bG35
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  5. #20
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    [email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
    <<And that improves SprintPCS' rating for having worst customer service
    how? >>

    The same way as your inane posts about your "smart" kids' SAT scores and
    people who use bad language.




  6. #21
    r2175
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.



    Robert M. wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>
    >>Robert M. wrote:
    >>
    >>>In article <[email protected]>,
    >>> "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
    >>>>anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
    >>>>http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
    >>>>it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
    >>>>which year did you kids take the SAT's?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>Wouldn't you like to know?

    >>
    >>Ok, NOW your caught, admit it or don't but you are.
    >>This guy's right, sat's go by 10's.
    >>What an immature response

    >
    >
    > Nope, not caught at all. All you know is that it wasn't 2003.


    Nope sorry , won't fly .
    Your caught, your a liar . I would encourage everyone to either kill
    file this guy or make sure he gets a dose of his mess up every time he
    posts about anyone else lying.




  7. #22
    r2175
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.



    Robert M. wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >> Man I'm sorry but if that is the only thing you have to say in your
    >>defense then that's pretty bad.
    >>You can spout B.S. about me and 2nd grade if you want , but you are the
    >>one still in kindergarten as far as your response goes.
    >>Pathetic

    >
    >
    > And that improves SprintPCS' rating for having worst customer service
    > how?


    Doesn't, just proves your a hypocritical liar. nothing more.
    See one has nothing to do with the other, if you had gotten out of 2nd
    grade YOU would know that.




  8. #23
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    In article <[email protected]>,
    r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >> Man I'm sorry but if that is the only thing you have to say in your
    > >>defense then that's pretty bad.
    > >>You can spout B.S. about me and 2nd grade if you want , but you are the
    > >>one still in kindergarten as far as your response goes.
    > >>Pathetic

    > >
    > >
    > > And that improves SprintPCS' rating for having worst customer service
    > > how?

    >
    > Doesn't, just proves your a hypocritical liar.


    Sorry but SprintPCS' ratings are the truth.



  9. #24
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    In article <[email protected]>,
    r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Nope sorry , won't fly .
    > Your caught, your a liar .


    Go ahead show your ignorance of SAT scores.

    PLONK



  10. #25
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    [email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
    <<Sorry but SprintPCS' ratings are the truth.>>

    Where your kids' sat scores are not.




  11. #26
    John
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > Go ahead show your ignorance of SAT scores.
    >


    Oh, you've got to be kidding...





  12. #27
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "John" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > Go ahead show your ignorance of SAT scores.
    > >

    >
    > Oh, you've got to be kidding...


    Nope, check it out here:

    http://www.collegeboard.com



  13. #28
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: SAT scores.


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > Go ahead show your ignorance of SAT scores.
    > > >

    > >
    > > Oh, you've got to be kidding...

    >
    > Nope, check it out here:
    >
    > http://www.collegeboard.com


    Nice splash screen- nothing about SAT scores.





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12