SAT scores.

In article <[email protected]>,
"John" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was under the impression that SAT scores were in multiples of 10, meaning
> you either get a 1520 or a 1530.

Sorry. Nice try.

---

› See More: SAT scores.

Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
which year did you kids take the SAT's?




"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that SAT scores were in multiples of 10,
meaning
> > you either get a 1520 or a 1530.
>
> Sorry. Nice try.

[email protected] (John) wrote:
<<Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score
reported as anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html it
looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
which year did you kids take the SAT's? >>

Hmmm... good luck getting a solid answer from Phillipe. You challenged
something he said earlier in this thread, he didn't like it, and came
back with his typical arrogant response that provided no information or
facts to back him up.

"John" <[email protected]> wrote:
<<I was under the impression that SAT scores were in multiples of 10,
meaning you either get a 1520 or a 1530.>>

Robert M.'s response:
<<Sorry. Nice try. >>

Do you have a URL for that?

In article <[email protected]>,
"John" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
> anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
> http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
> it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
> which year did you kids take the SAT's?

Wouldn't you like to know?

The troll >Robert M." [email protected] babbled:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
>> anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
>> http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
>> it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
>> which year did you kids take the SAT's?

>
>Wouldn't you like to know?
>

I would think Phillie arrived at those alleged SAT scores by adding his own IQ
Score to the total of his three children's SAT scores.

Or perhaps the number refers to the number of troll posts he averages per
month.

What a loser...

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported
as
> > anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
> > http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
> > it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
> > which year did you kids take the SAT's?
>
> Wouldn't you like to know?

Typical 3rd grade posting by you Phillipe, but then again ... What's New?
You always do ... must be the cooties.

Bob

"Siteldawgnumber1" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The troll >Robert M." [email protected] babbled:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score
reported as
> >> anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
> >> http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
> >> it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
> >> which year did you kids take the SAT's?
>
> >
> >Wouldn't you like to know?
> >
>
> I would think Phillie arrived at those alleged SAT scores by adding his
own IQ
> Score to the total of his three children's SAT scores.
>

So you're saying the kids scored a 1520?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't you like to know?

They didn't, that's why. Like any woman would have you, little enough
father any progeny.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAjZ4W1p0e3NXsrtERAh7OAKCOp0mp20vnmKSNtLV9DxOR3/SscwCgrRjK
Wbedje24NzYasL6q9N/91pU=
=IjSV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Siteldawgnumber1) wrote:

> The troll >Robert M." [email protected] babbled:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> > "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
> >> anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
> >> http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
> >> it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
> >> which year did you kids take the SAT's?
>
> >
> >Wouldn't you like to know?
> >
>
> I would think Phillie arrived at those alleged SAT scores by adding his own IQ
> Score to the total of his three children's SAT scores.
>
> Or perhaps the number refers to the number of troll posts he averages per
> month.
>
> What a loser...

Jealous are we? And which apologist are you?

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that SAT scores were in multiples of 10,
meaning
> > you either get a 1520 or a 1530.
>
> Sorry. Nice try.

No- sorry to you. John's post was correct, and yours, by way of being
inaccurate, is obviously a lie.

[email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
<<Jealous are we? And which apologist are you?>>

Not jealous at all... John called you on a lie about your kids' SAT
scores... and you did a typical non-response when he asked a legit
question.


Re: SAT scores.

Group: alt.cellular.sprintpcs Date: Mon, Apr 26, 2004, 4:46pm (EST+1)
From: [email protected] (John)
<<Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score
reported as anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html it
looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
which year did you kids take the SAT's? >>

Robert M. wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
>>anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
>>http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
>>it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
>>which year did you kids take the SAT's?
>
>
> Wouldn't you like to know?

Ok, NOW your caught, admit it or don't but you are.
This guy's right, sat's go by 10's.
What an immature response

Robert M. wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (Siteldawgnumber1) wrote:
>
>
>>The troll >Robert M." [email protected] babbled:
>>
>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>>"John" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Okay, when did they change that? I've never seen any SAT score reported as
>>>>anything beyond a multiple of 10. From this thread,
>>>>http://www.collegeconfidential.com/d.../69/63396.html
>>>>it looks like they're still only giving scores in multiples of 10. So,
>>>>which year did you kids take the SAT's?
>>
>>>Wouldn't you like to know?
>>>
>>
>>I would think Phillie arrived at those alleged SAT scores by adding his own IQ
>>Score to the total of his three children's SAT scores.
>>
>>Or perhaps the number refers to the number of troll posts he averages per
>>month.
>>
>>What a loser...
>
>
> Jealous are we? And which apologist are you?

Man I'm sorry but if that is the only thing you have to say in your
defense then that's pretty bad.
You can spout B.S. about me and 2nd grade if you want , but you are the
one still in kindergarten as far as your response goes.
Pathetic

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Jealous are we?

Of what? Your lies? One thing is for sure- if your children are fairly
intelligent, you are living proof that certain things in life skip a
generation.



>And which apologist are you?

The one you have chosen to ignore- the one who posted facts to refute your
lies for the last week, and the one you are apparently incapable of
challenging.