The Apologists.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Siteldawgnumber1) wrote:

And don't complain about my alias,, when you use one.

> >Robert M." [email protected] dribbled more of his droppings when he wrote
> >this:
>
> >Jealous are we? And which apologist are you?
>
> Certainly not jealous of you!
>
> While thinking about jealousy, it would seen the reason you have such a hard
> on
> for Smith and Vargas (among others), is that they actually know something
> about
> about SPCS, while you know very little about anything pertaining to wireless
> communications.

No I'm hard on their ego mania, their refusal to admit when they are
wrong and their insulting people when they are shown to be wrong. Smith,
Veldhouse, and the others with the bad language have long since been put
in my kill file

If they would be more consistant and not try to pretend they know the
answer to everything, such that they didnt have frequent wrong answers
they'd be more credible and useful.

This news group is about SprintPCS. It becomes a lot less useful if it
only is about what some decide is good things about SprintPCS. Or if the
apologists label anyone who posts anything they don't like as a TROLL or
worse.

I'm very sorry SprintPCS is rated worst in Customer Service by JD Power,
The Yankee and Consumer Reports. But insulting me, does not lengthen the
handle time CSRs have to operate under.

---

› See More: The Apologists.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> No I'm hard on their ego mania, their refusal to admit when they are
> wrong and their insulting people when they are shown to be wrong. Smith,
> Veldhouse, and the others with the bad language have long since been put
> in my kill file

When have you ever admitted a mistake? Not here, not in the AT&T or
Cingular groups, either. And you have NEVER proven anyone wrong- you have
only provided editorialized opinions that are not based in direct knowledge
or fact. Some of us DO know what we are talking about.

>
> If they would be more consistant and not try to pretend they know the
> answer to everything, such that they didnt have frequent wrong answers
> they'd be more credible and useful.

As pointed out before, there are certain categories of threads that many of
us choose not to post, just for the reason we don't know the answer. You,
on the other hand, have no such control, and you make up answers when you
don't know it.

>
> This news group is about SprintPCS. It becomes a lot less useful if it
> only is about what some decide is good things about SprintPCS. Or if the
> apologists label anyone who posts anything they don't like as a TROLL or
> worse.
>
> I'm very sorry SprintPCS is rated worst in Customer Service by JD Power,
> The Yankee and Consumer Reports. But insulting me, does not lengthen the
> handle time CSRs have to operate under.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> This news group is about SprintPCS. It becomes a lot less useful if it
> only is about what some decide is good things about SprintPCS. Or if the
> apologists label anyone who posts anything they don't like as a TROLL or
> worse.
>

So this would fit in just how?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert M." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Is Mike a moron too?


> In article <[email protected]>,
> r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
>
> There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> 2nd grade when they taught about question marks.