Why????

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> I just believe that it will harm Sprint in the future by pushing F&F
> over F&C instead of giving each equal promotion. The person in the
> store (that I referred to in my original post in this thread) was turned
> off by the pricing of F&F, but the rep made no attempt to tell him about
> F&C... which could have netted Sprint a new customer. If this becomes
> widespread (and O/Siris did say that Sprint's plan is to push F&F as
> Consumer Plans and F&C as "business" plans)... this could be a real
> problem for Sprint when it comes to signing new customers.

Sprint PCS already had a problem before F&F. It lost 1,400,000 customers
last quarter. Its now doubling its advertising budget to try and push
F&F, and likely with SprintPCS now merged back into Sprint, they wont be
as forth coming on their loses in their 10_Ks.

---

› See More: Why????

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Eric) wrote:

> People seem to think that I am completely against Sprint making new
> service plans and such... I fully support F&F pricing as it will help
> some people. But on the same token, the high prices of plans that have
> 550 minutes or more that F&F has can really turn off potential customers
> if they are not made aware of other fixed rate plans. With nationwide
> WLNP around the bend, Sprint needs to look flexible, sure, but they also
> need to look *competitive*.

They also need to get a better reputation for their customer service.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
>=20
> Sprint PCS already had a problem before F&F. It lost 1,400,000 customers=
=20
> last quarter.
>=20

Well then, since, by your own standards, Verizon Wireless had 2.04=20
million customers leave in the same quarter, then they're *really* in=20
trouble.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them