Sprint sales Liars

"Eric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
(Scott Stephenson) wrote:
<<Eric- I'm not sure that this is necessarily true. The quality of
service in Georgia is probably the same as it was when the initial
contract was signed, if not better. If an area has no coverage now, its
pretty safe to bet that it didn't have coverage when the contract was
signed years ago. In short, Sprint is providing at least the same level
of coverage as it was three years ago. There is no legal basis for
getting out of a contract because the service hasn't changed for the
worse. And reading the initial post, this was a move that was
anticipated years before it occurred- there wouldn't even be a hardship
claim to stand on. >>

<I would normally agree with you here, but if the rep assured the OP that
there would be service in the area of Georgia he was moving to, then it
becomes Sprint's responsibility to provide appropriate and acceptable
service. >

True, but reread the OP- no mention of a coverage guarantee.

---

› See More: Sprint sales Liars

If you'll be switching to another provider, take a look at Stanley
Cline's web page about providers in the Southeast, including his guide
to Atlanta.

http://www.roamer1.org/wireless/

[email protected] wrote:

> Oh yea, one more thing. The sprint signal is real weak and unreliable
> down here south of Atlanta. No sprint signal in most valleys and in
> many buildings. My honest opinion......sprint pretty much sucks all
> the way around. I'll be gone soon, won't return and will be sure to
> relay my personal experiences with the company to pretty much everyone
> and anyone who ever asks my personal opinion of them.

--
Frank Harris in San Francisco with an A620