Dum People Live In Hurricane Country Then Cry

what are you talking about... you just posted to make it look like I
said something I didn't. Jackass.

[email protected]e wrote:

> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:47:36 GMT, Jim85CJ <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Sounds like they didn't buy the correct insurance so they've been paying
>>for something they didn't need. How is that being "screwed"?
>
>
> Do me a favor, post your drivel so that it doesn't look like it was
> part of my post...
>
>
>>"it's written in legaleze so common people don't see it"
>>So you are saying that "common people" are stupid?
>
>
> Whatever, troll all you like.
>
>
>>>>I agree people SHOULD have insurance, but some barely get by as it is....
>>>>AND be pissed off if you want about rebuilding their lives.... At least they
>>>>are Americans. We're spending BILLIONS to rebuild IRAQ, a nation who HATES
>>>>OUR GUTS.. I don't hear anyone *****ing about their meager pay checks paying
>>>>out their asses towards taxes for that.......
>
>
> THIS is what I called "intelligent"

---

› See More: Dum People Live In Hurricane Country Then Cry

You, Jeff, are an idiot.

Jeff wrote:

> "Jim85CJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>"The jobs that give rich people services"
>>"rich people" PAY for these services. They are not giving anything.
>
>
> You can say that again. After the tax cut that dumb-ass Bush gave out, they
> are giving a lot less rich people of thier income as taxes. Too bad he
> didn't do as much for middle class and poor people. His no child left behind
> act should be no millionair left behind act.
>
>
>>"I've never worked for a poor person
>
>
> I have. I am proud to be a mentor for two kids without a ton of money.
>
> And who do you think spend a larger percentage of their income on auto fuel,
> telephones and other necessities of life that bring a bunch of profits to
> rich people?
>
> When buying insurance means that you won't be able to afford food, most
> people will go for food. I bet a lot of the people who lived in mobile homes
> couldn't afford insurance. Povery sucks.
>
> I guess you can think of the government aid as insurance for everyone. If
> your area is hit by a big natural disaster, the feds will help you, too.
>
> The feds even helped some around NYC after 9/11. Too bad they aren't paying
> communities for the extra policing that is now required for homeland
> security. A lot of community policing got cut out of city budgets.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>>Jeff wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>message news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>>>>"Dumb people live in hurricane country, then cry when their lives are
>>>>>turned upside-down."
>>>>
>>>>What bugs me is the ones who have no insurance, and now want the
>>>>government (i.e., taxpayers) to pay for their losses.
>>>
>>>
>>>You're right. Let's let the people the just die in Florida. No help with
>>>rebuilding their houses, getting new clothes, etc. And if they need to
>
> poop,
>
>>>let the squat where they are. They really don't need shelter, either.
>
> Maybe
>
>>>we could be real nice, and provide them some tents and blankets for when
>
> it
>
>>>gets cold.
>>>
>>>I mean, what do we need them for? They have low-paying jobs and can
>
> barely
>
>>>make ends meet. The jobs that give rich people services, like ready
>
> people
>
>>>to pay for gas on the way to the resort, cleaning the bathrooms in the
>>>resort, and making food in McDonalds on the way to the resort.
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, there people don't have money to begin with.
>>>
>>>I am glad our government is helping them.
>>>
>>>Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>John Richards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

"they are giving a lot less rich people of thier income as taxes."
I'm not sure what this means but my tax cut covers my daughters private
school tuition.

Jeff wrote:

> "Jim85CJ" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>"The jobs that give rich people services"
>>"rich people" PAY for these services. They are not giving anything.
>
>
> You can say that again. After the tax cut that dumb-ass Bush gave out, they
> are giving a lot less rich people of thier income as taxes. Too bad he
> didn't do as much for middle class and poor people. His no child left behind
> act should be no millionair left behind act.
>
>
>>"I've never worked for a poor person
>
>
> I have. I am proud to be a mentor for two kids without a ton of money.
>
> And who do you think spend a larger percentage of their income on auto fuel,
> telephones and other necessities of life that bring a bunch of profits to
> rich people?
>
> When buying insurance means that you won't be able to afford food, most
> people will go for food. I bet a lot of the people who lived in mobile homes
> couldn't afford insurance. Povery sucks.
>
> I guess you can think of the government aid as insurance for everyone. If
> your area is hit by a big natural disaster, the feds will help you, too.
>
> The feds even helped some around NYC after 9/11. Too bad they aren't paying
> communities for the extra policing that is now required for homeland
> security. A lot of community policing got cut out of city budgets.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>>Jeff wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>message news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>
>>>>>"Dumb people live in hurricane country, then cry when their lives are
>>>>>turned upside-down."
>>>>
>>>>What bugs me is the ones who have no insurance, and now want the
>>>>government (i.e., taxpayers) to pay for their losses.
>>>
>>>
>>>You're right. Let's let the people the just die in Florida. No help with
>>>rebuilding their houses, getting new clothes, etc. And if they need to
>
> poop,
>
>>>let the squat where they are. They really don't need shelter, either.
>
> Maybe
>
>>>we could be real nice, and provide them some tents and blankets for when
>
> it
>
>>>gets cold.
>>>
>>>I mean, what do we need them for? They have low-paying jobs and can
>
> barely
>
>>>make ends meet. The jobs that give rich people services, like ready
>
> people
>
>>>to pay for gas on the way to the resort, cleaning the bathrooms in the
>>>resort, and making food in McDonalds on the way to the resort.
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, there people don't have money to begin with.
>>>
>>>I am glad our government is helping them.
>>>
>>>Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>John Richards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Smiling Wickedly, Spectre answered:

> I really love DUMB people who can not even ***** the word DUMB calling
> others "DUM". Priceless....ROFL
> "BLKHTRYKEY" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>Dum People Live In Hurricane Country Then Cry When There
>>Live Is Turn Upside Down Good
>
>
>
especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
what type of home they have etc..

On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:02:24 -0700, Michael Arends
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> "BLKHTRYKEY" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>> Dum People Live In Hurricane Country Then Cry When There
>>> Live Is Turn Upside Down Good
>
> especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
> insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
> what type of home they have etc..

What's your point? That insurance companies know unacceptable risk when
they see it?

>> Dum People Live In Hurricane Country Then Cry When There
>> Live Is Turn Upside Down Good

> What's your point? That insurance companies know
>unacceptable risk when they see it?

The dumb ass is just so proud to display his inability to
***** correctly and use proper English grammar. Note
the onager's use of "there" for "their."

Mark Allread wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:02:24 -0700, Michael Arends
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> "BLKHTRYKEY" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >>> Dum People Live In Hurricane Country Then Cry When There
> >>> Live Is Turn Upside Down Good
> >
> > especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
> > insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
> > what type of home they have etc..
>
> What's your point? That insurance companies know unacceptable risk when
> they see it?

No, the point is the OP was mad that these people are asking for help
instead of having insurance. It's because they (some) CAN'T get
insurance.

"Michael Arends" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
> insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
> what type of home they have etc..

When insurance companies consider the risk too hazardous, or the
premiums become astronomical, that is a good clue that people
shouldn't be building houses there. This country still has many
under-populated areas, such as Arizona, where there are no
hurricanes, earthquakes, or tornadoes. I never understood why
so many people retire in Florida: high humidity, snakes, mosquitoes
and lots of other bugs, it's all bad.

--

John Richards

"Jeff" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> When buying insurance means that you won't be able to afford food, most
> people will go for food. I bet a lot of the people who lived in mobile homes
> couldn't afford insurance. Povery sucks.

If you can't afford hurricane insurance, you shouldn't own a home in a
hurricane-prone area. That's common sense. Let them be poor somewhere
else, like Arizona, where there are no hurricanes, earthquakes or tornadoes.
Taxpayers shouldn't have to build you a new house every few years, just
because you insist on living in a hurricane zone without insurance.

--

John Richards

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:29:27 GMT, Michael Arends
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Mark Allread wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:02:24 -0700, Michael Arends
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
>> > insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
>> > what type of home they have etc..
>>
>> What's your point? That insurance companies know unacceptable risk when
>> they see it?
>
> No, the point is the OP was mad that these people are asking for help
> instead of having insurance. It's because they (some) CAN'T get
> insurance.

Oh, yea. He should have been mad that these people are asking for help
because they chose to live in a high risk area without being able to
afford the risk.

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:09:53 GMT, Jim85CJ <[email protected]>
wrote:

>what are you talking about... you just posted to make it look like I
>said something I didn't. Jackass.

I did no such thing unless your header got misquoted on the post.
Either way, your insistence on name calling has pointed out to me that
you are not capable of mature discussion nor are you worth the effort
to converse with.

Welcome to my mostly ignored list...

>[email protected] wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:47:36 GMT, Jim85CJ <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sounds like they didn't buy the correct insurance so they've been paying
>>>for something they didn't need. How is that being "screwed"?
>>
>>
>> Do me a favor, post your drivel so that it doesn't look like it was
>> part of my post...
>>
>>
>>>"it's written in legaleze so common people don't see it"
>>>So you are saying that "common people" are stupid?
>>
>>
>> Whatever, troll all you like.
>>
>>
>>>>>I agree people SHOULD have insurance, but some barely get by as it is....
>>>>>AND be pissed off if you want about rebuilding their lives.... At least they
>>>>>are Americans. We're spending BILLIONS to rebuild IRAQ, a nation who HATES
>>>>>OUR GUTS.. I don't hear anyone *****ing about their meager pay checks paying
>>>>>out their asses towards taxes for that.......
>>
>>
>> THIS is what I called "intelligent"

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> "Michael Arends" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> > especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
> > insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
> > what type of home they have etc..
>
> When insurance companies consider the risk too hazardous, or the
> premiums become astronomical, that is a good clue that people
> shouldn't be building houses there. This country still has many
> under-populated areas, such as Arizona, where there are no
> hurricanes, earthquakes, or tornadoes. I never understood why
> so many people retire in Florida: high humidity, snakes, mosquitoes
> and lots of other bugs, it's all bad.
>
>

So they can live in a mobile home ON the BEACH!!!

Sorry, had to be OT for this one.

--

Drum-

"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]...
>
> When insurance companies consider the risk too hazardous, or the
> premiums become astronomical, that is a good clue that people
> shouldn't be building houses there. This country still has many
> under-populated areas, such as Arizona, where there are no
> hurricanes, earthquakes, or tornadoes. >
> John Richards


Yeah, and THERE'S NO ****ING WATER THERE EITHER!!!

Many people in Florida have lived here for years and invested what little
they have in their homes a long time ago. After having been insured for
decades, the insurance companies then withdrew coverage. Now the people have
no insurance and no financial means to make a move.


"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]...
> "Michael Arends" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > especially when a lot of the people do not, NOT have insurance. The
> > insurance companies REFUSE to cover them because of where they live,
> > what type of home they have etc..
>
> When insurance companies consider the risk too hazardous, or the
> premiums become astronomical, that is a good clue that people
> shouldn't be building houses there. This country still has many
> under-populated areas, such as Arizona, where there are no
> hurricanes, earthquakes, or tornadoes. I never understood why
> so many people retire in Florida: high humidity, snakes, mosquitoes
> and lots of other bugs, it's all bad.
>
> --
>
> John Richards

"Oscar_Lives" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:r5eVc.19101$Fg5.9963@attbi_s53...
>
> "John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message news:[email protected]...
>>
>> When insurance companies consider the risk too hazardous, or the
>> premiums become astronomical, that is a good clue that people
>> shouldn't be building houses there. This country still has many
>> under-populated areas, such as Arizona, where there are no
>> hurricanes, earthquakes, or tornadoes. >
>> John Richards
>
>
> Yeah, and THERE'S NO ****ING WATER THERE EITHER!!!

That's strange, because the Phoenix area is one of the fastest growing
regions in the country. They seem to have plenty water.

--

John Richards