Daniel Tso wrote:
>
> In article <B_apd.8732$sX5.1647@trndny05>, "Lmmr" <lee.mille@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I am thinking of switching from Nextel to Sprint PCS.
> >
> >I live in NYC Metro and travel frequently throughout NY State and Conn.
> >
> >I am concerned about the "switch" from PCS digital to analog. I see on the
> >website that most/all of the major Highways in the area had digital coverage
> >but most other areas of NY do not and it looks like it would switch to
> >analog.
> >
> >Obviously, I don't want to worry about the constant switch back and forth
> >between in network and out of network and the high costs involved, if the
> >map is accurate.
>
> I don't believe the map is that inaccurate. Most of NY, on a square mile
> basis, is not covered by the digital network, but that is true everywhere in
> the US. If you REALLY must have service in the most remote, rural parts of
> NY, you must have analog service. Nextel is not better in this regard, it is
> worse by far.
>
> So, if what you describe is true, that you will be travelling to rural areas
> in NY and CT, I think you would be crazy not to get some level of analog
> service within your rate plan. That mean going with Verizon, or getting
> Sprint's FCA option, the $5 option to cover roaming charges. And of
> course, getting a phone that can support analog (AMPS).
>
> If actually you will only go into remote areas very infrequently, then a nice
> Sprint CS person can add a 50 minute roaming bundle on your plan for
> free. Otherwise, get the FCA option, and no high costs will be incurred.
One caveat... With FCA, in order to keep the charge at $5.00/month, at least
half of your minutes must be non-roaming.
Notan