Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 68 of 68
  1. #61
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:14:55 -0500,
    Ralph Blach <[email protected]> wrote:

    >I dont think this merger will be good. I just heard a lot people will
    >be laid off
    >
    >How can that be good?


    Improves efficiency, reducing costs, thereby resulting in improved service and
    lower prices.

    >To top it off, there is NO real push to talk
    >except IDEN. This will mean that Sprint/Nextel will have run dual
    >networks for a long time.


    Both CDMA2000 and GSM now have PTT technology.

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



    See More: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff




  2. #62
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff


    "Ralph Blach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > I dont think this merger will be good. I just heard a lot people will
    > be laid off


    Heard where? This sort of conflicts with what you say below.

    >
    > How can that be good? To top it off, there is NO real push to talk
    > except IDEN. This will mean that Sprint/Nextel will have run dual
    > networks for a long time.
    >


    Nextel has committed to iDen through 2007 (2008?). And they have also
    stated that they won't give it up until a completely comparable (if not
    better) PTT product is available on CDMA. And running two networks for a
    couple of years guarantees more jobs than it eliminates (the conflict in
    statements I mentioned earlier).





  3. #63
    John R. Copeland
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff

    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
    news:[email protected]...
    >=20
    > Nextel has committed to iDen through 2007 (2008?). And they have also
    > stated that they won't give it up until a completely comparable (if =

    not
    > better) PTT product is available on CDMA. And running two networks =

    for a
    > couple of years guarantees more jobs than it eliminates (the conflict =

    in
    > statements I mentioned earlier).
    >


    I thought I heard Nextel also had committed to support high-speed data.
    I know very little about iDEN, but I've heard it can't handle the data.
    If true, it sounds as though Nextel's caught in a squeeze.




  4. #64
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff


    "John R. Copeland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    >


    I thought I heard Nextel also had committed to support high-speed data.
    I know very little about iDEN, but I've heard it can't handle the data.
    If true, it sounds as though Nextel's caught in a squeeze.

    They are successfully running high speed data in NC. Full rollout was being
    considered, but the network upgrade costs were pretty steep ($3B). This and
    the spectrum swap would have been doable, but quite expensive. No squeeze-
    just a lot of money to spend.





  5. #65
    John R. Copeland
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff

    "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
    news:[email protected]...
    >=20
    > "John R. Copeland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >=20
    >>

    > I thought I heard Nextel also had committed to support high-speed =

    data.
    > I know very little about iDEN, but I've heard it can't handle the =

    data.
    > If true, it sounds as though Nextel's caught in a squeeze.
    >=20
    > They are successfully running high speed data in NC. Full rollout was =

    being
    > considered, but the network upgrade costs were pretty steep ($3B). =

    This and
    > the spectrum swap would have been doable, but quite expensive. No =

    squeeze-
    > just a lot of money to spend.
    >

    Ah! Thanks, Scott.




  6. #66
    Joseph
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff

    On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:14:55 -0500, Ralph Blach
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >I dont think this merger will be good. I just heard a lot people will
    >be laid off


    Because of the merger! That's *never* happened before!

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




  7. #67
    Joseph
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff

    On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:20:03 -0800, Steve Sobol <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >TDMA is dead.
    >All of the other TDMA carriers are migrating to GSM.


    GSM *is* TDMA based! If you meant IS-136 you should say so.

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




  8. #68
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff

    Joseph wrote:

    >>TDMA is dead.
    >>All of the other TDMA carriers are migrating to GSM.

    >
    > GSM *is* TDMA based! If you meant IS-136 you should say so.


    Yes. You're right, and I *did* mean IS-136.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345