Results 61 to 68 of 68
- 12-20-2004, 04:24 PM #61John NavasGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <[email protected]> on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:14:55 -0500,
Ralph Blach <[email protected]> wrote:
>I dont think this merger will be good. I just heard a lot people will
>be laid off
>
>How can that be good?
Improves efficiency, reducing costs, thereby resulting in improved service and
lower prices.
>To top it off, there is NO real push to talk
>except IDEN. This will mean that Sprint/Nextel will have run dual
>networks for a long time.
Both CDMA2000 and GSM now have PTT technology.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>
› See More: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
- 12-20-2004, 06:10 PM #62Scott StephensonGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
"Ralph Blach" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I dont think this merger will be good. I just heard a lot people will
> be laid off
Heard where? This sort of conflicts with what you say below.
>
> How can that be good? To top it off, there is NO real push to talk
> except IDEN. This will mean that Sprint/Nextel will have run dual
> networks for a long time.
>
Nextel has committed to iDen through 2007 (2008?). And they have also
stated that they won't give it up until a completely comparable (if not
better) PTT product is available on CDMA. And running two networks for a
couple of years guarantees more jobs than it eliminates (the conflict in
statements I mentioned earlier).
- 12-20-2004, 06:28 PM #63John R. CopelandGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
news:[email protected]...
>=20
> Nextel has committed to iDen through 2007 (2008?). And they have also
> stated that they won't give it up until a completely comparable (if =
not
> better) PTT product is available on CDMA. And running two networks =
for a
> couple of years guarantees more jobs than it eliminates (the conflict =
in
> statements I mentioned earlier).
>
I thought I heard Nextel also had committed to support high-speed data.
I know very little about iDEN, but I've heard it can't handle the data.
If true, it sounds as though Nextel's caught in a squeeze.
- 12-20-2004, 06:38 PM #64Scott StephensonGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
"John R. Copeland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
I thought I heard Nextel also had committed to support high-speed data.
I know very little about iDEN, but I've heard it can't handle the data.
If true, it sounds as though Nextel's caught in a squeeze.
They are successfully running high speed data in NC. Full rollout was being
considered, but the network upgrade costs were pretty steep ($3B). This and
the spectrum swap would have been doable, but quite expensive. No squeeze-
just a lot of money to spend.
- 12-20-2004, 06:54 PM #65John R. CopelandGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
news:[email protected]...
>=20
> "John R. Copeland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>=20
>>
> I thought I heard Nextel also had committed to support high-speed =
data.
> I know very little about iDEN, but I've heard it can't handle the =
data.
> If true, it sounds as though Nextel's caught in a squeeze.
>=20
> They are successfully running high speed data in NC. Full rollout was =
being
> considered, but the network upgrade costs were pretty steep ($3B). =
This and
> the spectrum swap would have been doable, but quite expensive. No =
squeeze-
> just a lot of money to spend.
>
Ah! Thanks, Scott.
- 12-20-2004, 08:41 PM #66JosephGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:14:55 -0500, Ralph Blach
<[email protected]> wrote:
>I dont think this merger will be good. I just heard a lot people will
>be laid off
Because of the merger! That's *never* happened before!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 12-20-2004, 08:43 PM #67JosephGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:20:03 -0800, Steve Sobol <[email protected]>
wrote:
>TDMA is dead.
>All of the other TDMA carriers are migrating to GSM.
GSM *is* TDMA based! If you meant IS-136 you should say so.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- 12-20-2004, 09:34 PM #68Steve SobolGuest
Re: Sprint Nextel merger is a bad thing for Nextel Staff
Joseph wrote:
>>TDMA is dead.
>>All of the other TDMA carriers are migrating to GSM.
>
> GSM *is* TDMA based! If you meant IS-136 you should say so.
Yes. You're right, and I *did* mean IS-136.
--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- Cingular
- alt.cellular.nextel
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
- alt.cellular.cingular
Please suggest an outsourcing company
in General Service Provider Forum