SprintPCS still getting bashed?

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in news:S_OMd.483
[email protected]:

> <snip>

Holy ****, Bob. The 2 of you are like acouple of
7 year olds sitting in the back seat of a car.

"He hit me." "He hit me first."

Give it a rest.

Alan

---

› See More: SprintPCS still getting bashed?

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[email protected]...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> > news:[email protected]...
>> >> >> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:[email protected]...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> >
>> >> > <snipped>
>> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Checkmate?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Yes checkmate. Anecdotal crap you pulled out of your rear end
>> >> >> >> doesn't
>> >> >> >> hold watter.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Actually, it's well documented
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Feel free to post that documentation right here
>> >> >
>> >> > Naw
>> >>
>> >> So you lied. So noted.
>> >
>> > No, I didn't.
>>
>> No proof? No merit.
>
> If you use that reasoning, then EVERYTHING you've said, from the start of
> this thread is bogus and a pack of lies ...

No proof. No merit.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<snipped>
> No proof. No merit.

Keep saying that like it's true. Everything I said about Verizon was right
on ... They issued a new PRL, so that their customers wouldn't roam on SPCS
as their preference to make calls.

Like I said, I've got no reason to lie about it. I'm not going to waste my
time proving my point. All I can say about your posts here are they appear
to be bogus and only posted to troll ...

I said I wouldn't get back into this thread, and unfortunately I did. If you
don't want to believe the information, that's your prerogative, but it
doesn't negate the fact that Verizon did exactly as I said ...

Bob

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:

>
> <snip>

Got to get the last word in, huh?

The sign of a true child.

Alan

Smiling Wickedly, Bob Smith answered:
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> <snipped>
>
>>No proof. No merit.
>
>
> Keep saying that like it's true. Everything I said about Verizon was right
> on ... They issued a new PRL, so that their customers wouldn't roam on SPCS
> as their preference to make calls.
>
> Like I said, I've got no reason to lie about it. I'm not going to waste my
> time proving my point. All I can say about your posts here are they appear
> to be bogus and only posted to troll ...
>
> I said I wouldn't get back into this thread, and unfortunately I did. If you
> don't want to believe the information, that's your prerogative, but it
> doesn't negate the fact that Verizon did exactly as I said ...
>
> Bob
>
>
a troll is a troll is a troll Bob. You'll never win the argument with
them. They're so full of **** they don't even realize it. It just comes
Naturally to them.

--
*..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- Michael -:¦:-
-:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> <snipped>
>> No proof. No merit.
>
>
> I said I wouldn't get back into this thread, and unfortunately I did.

Which -- like everything else you've said -- proves you're a liar with no
credibility. When you're ready to post proof instead of your usual
hand-waving balderdash feel free to break your own word and post in this
thread again. Otherwise STFU.

"Alan P" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:1107553660.edb2db815eea1f84c15d40fb98f2878d@teranews...
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
>
>>
>> <snip>
>
> Got to get the last word in, huh?
>
> The sign of a true child.

Precisely. He can't even control himself.

Really sad when you think about it.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in news:3jSMd.79504
[email protected]:

> "Alan P" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:1107553660.edb2db815eea1f84c15d40fb98f2878d@teranews...
>> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in
>> news:[email protected]:
>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>
>> Got to get the last word in, huh?
>>
>> The sign of a true child.
>
> Precisely. He can't even control himself.
>
> Really sad when you think about it.

Look in the mirror, you stupid little boy.

You're no better.

Alan

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > <snipped>
> >> No proof. No merit.
> >
> >
> > I said I wouldn't get back into this thread, and unfortunately I did.
>
> Which -- like everything else you've said -- proves you're a liar with no
> credibility. When you're ready to post proof instead of your usual
> hand-waving balderdash feel free to break your own word and post in this
> thread again. Otherwise STFU.

No ... You STFU - Here's one link reflecting one of the threads on the
conversation - http://tinyurl.com/43c3v

Bob

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message

> >
> > Yeah- be proud of it. It was obviously the highlight of your short
little
> > career.
>
> Is that all? Come on Scotty, I expected something a tad wittier from
you.

Too bad- Your entertainment is best left to the icons of your generation.
The teletubbies marathon should be starting soon.

>
> I don't know why, but I did.
>
> >
> >>
> >> You see Scotty, in high school and college menial jobs to gain work
> >> experience and a resume is actually beneficial.
> >
> > Funny- I found that doing real work during college to be much more
> > beneficial.
>
> How can you compare what you didn't do, to what you've claimed you've
done?
> Whatever college jobs you may or may not have had surely didn't dictate
what
> you did later on in life -- or did it?

Sure did- the advantages to an advanced program offered by one of the most
prestigious institutions in the country. Companies will actually offer
clerk and apprentice positions to prepare you for the real world IF you are
attending the right college and in the right program. So, the menial jobs
you held in college more than likely sent you down the path to mediocrity
that your posts would indicate as being the best fit for you.


>
>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Verizon has never stooped that low for customers, nor can they due
to
> >> > their
> >> >> more strict credit checks. When I began working for Radio Shack
> >> > customers
> >> >> who required $500-$1000 deposits for Verizon would come back
approved
> >> >> with
> >> >> no deposit and at most a $125 ASL with Sprint.
> >> >
> >> > And went from Sprint to Radio Shack?
> >>
> >> Sprint for 6 months, Radio Shack for a year - all fun times, and
learning
> >> experiences.
> >
> > Of course they were- they didn't have the fry machine you were used to.
>
> Brrrmp-crash! I knew you could arise a chuckle out of me yet.

Yeah- it made me wonder if they let you make the burgers yet.

>
> Good boy.
>
> >
> >>
> >> What's interesting however is how you predictably ignored the point I
was
> >> making on Sprint, and instead tried to turn this into some idiotic rant
> >> on
> >> my work experience in high school and college. Surely you don't
> >> believe
> >> the readers of this newsgroup are as stupid as you are -- or do you?
> >>
> >
> > I ignored your point because it is unsubstantiated
>
> How would you like me to "substantiate" my personal experience?

I have yet to see any former Sprint employee back up your claim (and there
are quite a few that post here regularly). And those that have posted
conflicting information carry much more credibility than you- they didn't
stomp in here whining about how much "Sprint sucks".

>
> > and comes with the very
> > low credibility that anything you post should have.
>
> IOW, you can't address the point so have sidestepped the issue with silly
> evasive replies.

I addressed it- I think you are full of **** in saying it in the first
place.

>
> So noted.

Don't hurt yourself.

>
> > Spin your career any
> > way you want-
>
> Earth to Scotty. Radio Shack wasn't a career move.

I'm betting it would still be a lateral move for you, even today.

>
> As you've already implied, your career began in college with "real jobs".
> Personally time restraints in my _superior_ instiutution (hurts doesn't
it?)

Not at all- if you were worth anything at your "superior institution", you
would have been doing the same thing I was. Now I bet that hurts, because
if you did indeed attend a college of any true distinction, many of your
classmates were doing exactly what I was. Many of the morons at those
schools resort to menial jobs.


> never allowed me to start looking for careers at 18.

Which pretty much proves my last point.

> I'm certain at your
> community college it was all too easy.

The only community colleges I've ever stepped foot on are the one that hired
me as a technical consultant and one that my wife and I attended an art show
at. Nice try.

>
> > you've now pretty much identified yourself as a snot-nosed
> > little wannabe and barely worthy of toying with.
>
> The best defense is a good offense, eh burger snot?

No defense- you are the one defending the superiority of your meager little
education.

>
> > According to your own
> > timeline, I've been out of college longer than you've been alive.
>
> Probably, but being a 40+ year old man defending the virtues of Sprint on
> Usenet isn't exactly anything to be proud of.

Funny- where did I defend Sprint? I merely commented on what an ass you
are. I could easily defend them, but I'm not in the mood to translate the
data into little words for you.

Usenet is a great hobby- where else can I find people that make my entry
level employees look so good?

>
> > Translation- nothing you can try to boast about has any effect.
>
> You replies of envy tell the story, my puppet.

You're the only one with envy- why else would you need to boast so much of
your childish accomplishments?

>
>
>

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > As a former Sprint employee I can also say it is a lie
> >>
> >> What does your experience at Sprint have to do with mine?
> >
> > His actually occurred.
>
> Nice one Scotty. Neither of us has posted anything verifying our claims
> besides what was posted here on Usenet, and you whole-heartedly accept his
> account while rejecting mines.

Maybe it is because ex-employees have postyed here in the past and provided
good information- its called a track record. He has one- you don't.

>
> Well at least you don't feign to have any credibility.

I don't need to satisfy any longing for credibility.

>
> >
> >> SprintPCS had
> >> and has a ****load of illegal immigrants on their service,
> >
> > So does Verizon.
>
> Not likely.

Very likely.

>What's interesting however, is you now accept my contention
> that a "****load" of illegal immigrants are using SprintPCS's service.

They all do. I don't believe its a big secret

>
> Thanx Scotty.
>
>
> >
> >>and I know why.
> >
> > Are you one of them?
>
> No.

That was convincing. Maybe I'm on to something here.

>
>
> >
> >> I'll testify under oath in any courtroom in America to that effect.
> >
> > Based on your credibility here, I'm sure it would be quite the story.
>
> What an individual who can't even remain consistent within the same thread
> thinks of my credibility doesn't mean much.

I'm very consistent. I have never wavered from the fact that you are a
whiney, low skilled, educationally challenged child.

>
> Now go play in traffic.

And take all your fun away? No thanks- mommy will let you cross the street
alone some day.

>
>

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >> "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news[email protected]...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > As a former Sprint employee I can also say it is a lie
>> >>
>> >> What does your experience at Sprint have to do with mine?
>> >
>> > His actually occurred.
>>
>> Nice one Scotty. Neither of us has posted anything verifying our claims
>> besides what was posted here on Usenet, and you whole-heartedly accept
>> his
>> account while rejecting mines.
>
> Maybe it is because ex-employees have postyed here in the past and
> provided
> good information- its called a track record. He has one- you don't.

In other words, neither one of us has posted anything verifying our claims
besides what was posted here on Usenet, and you whole-heartedly accept his
account while rejecting mines. The reason why is axiomatic -- his accounts
vibe well with your SprintPCS fascination and wild-eyed defense, while mine
suggests SprintPCS continually and knowingly commits crimes.


>
>>
>> Well at least you don't feign to have any credibility.
>
> I don't need to satisfy any longing for credibility.

It would be impossible for you to "satisfy" a trait you so dearly lack you
botched lobotomy.

>
>>
>> >
>> >> SprintPCS had
>> >> and has a ****load of illegal immigrants on their service,
>> >
>> > So does Verizon.
>>
>> Not likely.
>
> Very likely.

Feel free to continually libel Verizon, I've forwarded your accusations to
the proper authorities.

>
>>What's interesting however, is you now accept my contention
>> that a "****load" of illegal immigrants are using SprintPCS's service.
>
> They all do. I don't believe its a big secret

Another contradiction. You acknowledge SprintPCS's involvement with
illegal activities in this breath, and in the last attempt to refute my
claim. Multiple personality disorder?
>
>>
>> Thanx Scotty.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>and I know why.
>> >
>> > Are you one of them?
>>
>> No.
>
> That was convincing. Maybe I'm on to something here.

Crack perhaps.

>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >> I'll testify under oath in any courtroom in America to that effect.
>> >
>> > Based on your credibility here, I'm sure it would be quite the story.
>>
>> What an individual who can't even remain consistent within the same
>> thread
>> thinks of my credibility doesn't mean much.
>
> I'm very consistent.

Consistently contradicting yourself, yes. Unfortunately that's not a good
trait, Scotty.

>
>>
>> Now go play in traffic.
>
> And take all your fun away?

The fun will begin while you're playing in traffic.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
>> >
>> > Yeah- be proud of it. It was obviously the highlight of your short
> little
>> > career.
>>
>> Is that all? Come on Scotty, I expected something a tad wittier from
> you.
>
> Too bad-

Yes too bad. A waste of sperm such as yourself can only really be expected
to come up with one witty quip per post.

I'll be sure to lower my expectations from this point on.


>
>>
>> I don't know why, but I did.
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> You see Scotty, in high school and college menial jobs to gain work
>> >> experience and a resume is actually beneficial.
>> >
>> > Funny- I found that doing real work during college to be much more
>> > beneficial.
>>
>> How can you compare what you didn't do, to what you've claimed you've
> done?
>> Whatever college jobs you may or may not have had surely didn't dictate
> what
>> you did later on in life -- or did it?
>
> Sure did- the advantages to an advanced program offered by one of the most
> prestigious institutions in the country.

$1000 for you if you post a link to your diploma to a "prestigious"
university. I'll quickly follow suit.

> Companies will actually offer
> clerk and apprentice positions to prepare you for the real world

LOL. I actually wanted to get paid, my friend. The "apprentice"
positions that you and others like you were doing in the 70's really didn't
pay any dividends (or cash) as proven by the fact that you admittedly got a
job at a community college.

So sad -- yet so funny!

> So, the menial jobs
> you held in college more than likely sent you down the path to mediocrity

Interesting accusastion coming from a man who's wife likely works. Of
course, most low income families need two working parents.


>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Verizon has never stooped that low for customers, nor can they due
> to
>> >> > their
>> >> >> more strict credit checks. When I began working for Radio Shack
>> >> > customers
>> >> >> who required $500-$1000 deposits for Verizon would come back
> approved
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> no deposit and at most a $125 ASL with Sprint.
>> >> >
>> >> > And went from Sprint to Radio Shack?
>> >>
>> >> Sprint for 6 months, Radio Shack for a year - all fun times, and
> learning
>> >> experiences.
>> >
>> > Of course they were- they didn't have the fry machine you were used to.
>>
>> Brrrmp-crash! I knew you could arise a chuckle out of me yet.
>
> Yeah- it made me wonder if they let you make the burgers yet.

The burgers quip again? Well, we know we can't expect much in the
originality department when it comes to you, but at the very least Google up
some better insults.


>>
>> Good boy.
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> What's interesting however is how you predictably ignored the point I
> was
>> >> making on Sprint, and instead tried to turn this into some idiotic
>> >> rant
>> >> on
>> >> my work experience in high school and college. Surely you don't
>> >> believe
>> >> the readers of this newsgroup are as stupid as you are -- or do you?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I ignored your point because it is unsubstantiated
>>
>> How would you like me to "substantiate" my personal experience?
>
> I have yet to see any former Sprint employee back up your claim (and there
> are quite a few that post here regularly).

You just substantiated that claim by stating "all companies do that". You
can't have it both ways, faggot.

> And those that have posted
> conflicting information carry much more credibility than you

No they don't. You just claim they do because what they say goes hand in
hand with your SprintPCS obsession.

> they didn't
> stomp in here whining about how much "Sprint sucks".

Neither did I. But don't let silly things like the facts get in the way of
your frothing at the mouth replies.

>
>>
>> > and comes with the very
>> > low credibility that anything you post should have.
>>
>> IOW, you can't address the point so have sidestepped the issue with silly
>> evasive replies.
>
> I addressed it- I think you are full of **** in saying it in the first
> place.

"All companies do it". I do believe Sprint would fall under that rubric,
no?

>
>>
>> So noted.
>
> Don't hurt yourself.

You're an entertaining little punching bag, nothing more.

>
>>
>> > Spin your career any
>> > way you want-
>>
>> Earth to Scotty. Radio Shack wasn't a career move.
>
> I'm betting it would still be a lateral move for you, even today.

If you'd like to bet, post the diploma. What are you scared of?

Are you going to continue to talk the talk, or will you walk the walk?

Tell you what - $1000 - accept the bet as written and we'll use the US News
and World Report rankings to see who graduated from the "superior
institution". This seems to be the main thing that's gotten under your
skin, and I love beating you over the head with it.

Man up, *****. Post the link to that Ivy degree, or simply accept and
I'll go first while forwarding you a legally binding contract to your
personal email address.

>
>>
>> As you've already implied, your career began in college with "real jobs".
>> Personally time restraints in my _superior_ instiutution (hurts doesn't
> it?)
>
> Not at all- if you were worth anything at your "superior institution", you
> would have been doing the same thing I was.

Things work differently in Ivy's Scotty. Those community colleges have got
you all ****ed up.

> Now I bet that hurts, because
> if you did indeed attend a college of any true distinction, many of your
> classmates were doing exactly what I was.

What were you doing Scotty? Besides abstract claims you haven't said a
single thing about your college years. Let us in on that Donald Trump
apprentice gig you had at 20 so we can all chuckle at your expense.

Feel free to post it right here ------->

Or shuck and jive right here --------->

>> never allowed me to start looking for careers at 18.
>
> Which pretty much proves my last point.

Looking for careers at 18? That's what folks who don't go to college do.

>> I'm certain at your
>> community college it was all too easy.
>
> The only community colleges I've ever stepped foot on are the one that
> hired
> me as a technical consultant

ahahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha

Nuff said.

> and one that my wife and I attended an art show
> at.

Tell the ***** I want my money.

>>
>> > you've now pretty much identified yourself as a snot-nosed
>> > little wannabe and barely worthy of toying with.
>>
>> The best defense is a good offense, eh burger snot?
>
> No defense- you are the one defending the superiority of your meager
> little
> education.

You're the one who showed his hand by getting emotional over a point of fact
on my undergraduate degree - this whole thread has actually evolved into
just that. What's more, when called upon to put up proof in exchange for
a small wager you evade like a F-15 doing manuevers.

>
>>
>> > According to your own
>> > timeline, I've been out of college longer than you've been alive.
>>
>> Probably, but being a 40+ year old man defending the virtues of Sprint on
>> Usenet isn't exactly anything to be proud of.
>
> Funny- where did I defend Sprint?

Perhaps the 10,000 or so posts in this newsgroup and on Internet message
boards all relating to this company (while trolling the Verizon newsgroup
amongst other places) would be a place to start.

> Usenet is a great hobby-

Point proven. When "Usenet" is a hobby for a 40 year old man there's
really nothing more that needs to be said.

Try cricket, grandpa...or try ****ing your nasty wife once in a while after
I'm done with the *****.


>
>>
>> > Translation- nothing you can try to boast about has any effect.
>>
>> You replies of envy tell the story, my puppet.
>
> You're the only one with envy-

No you are. We can keep this thread going for the next month, Scotty.
I've made a decision on this one: I'm going to stay here and haunt you
until you put up a verifiable link of your community college diploma, and
send me that small chunk of change you owe me.

"The documented liar Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in
message news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "The documented liar Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote
>> in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> > <snipped>
>> >> No proof. No merit.
>> >
>> >
>> > I said I wouldn't get back into this thread, and unfortunately I did.
>>
>> Which -- like everything else you've said -- proves you're a liar with no
>> credibility. When you're ready to post proof instead of your usual
>> hand-waving balderdash feel free to break your own word and post in this
>> thread again. Otherwise STFU.
>
> No ... You STFU

Why? As admitted by you above you _lied_ -- that being the case, you now
have no credibility on this or any other issue.

>- Here's one link

Silly PRL issues that have nothing to do with Verizon and SprintPCS
coverage. Earth to Bob: PRL's deal with roaming you buffoon -- and that
PRL situation dealt with places hillbillies, and trailer park trash live
in....the middle of no where to put it nicely.

No proof, and no merit.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >> >> "Desi" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >> news[email protected]...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > As a former Sprint employee I can also say it is a lie
> >> >>
> >> >> What does your experience at Sprint have to do with mine?
> >> >
> >> > His actually occurred.
> >>
> >> Nice one Scotty. Neither of us has posted anything verifying our
claims
> >> besides what was posted here on Usenet, and you whole-heartedly accept
> >> his
> >> account while rejecting mines.
> >
> > Maybe it is because ex-employees have postyed here in the past and
> > provided
> > good information- its called a track record. He has one- you don't.
>
> In other words, neither one of us has posted anything verifying our claims
> besides what was posted here on Usenet, and you whole-heartedly accept his
> account while rejecting mines. The reason why is axiomatic -- his
accounts
> vibe well with your SprintPCS fascination and wild-eyed defense, while
mine
> suggests SprintPCS continually and knowingly commits crimes.

Again you put words in my mouth. I have yet to say anything good or bad
about Sprint. I have not defended them or shown any fascination for them.
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> Well at least you don't feign to have any credibility.
> >
> > I don't need to satisfy any longing for credibility.
>
> It would be impossible for you to "satisfy" a trait you so dearly lack you
> botched lobotomy.

Hmmmm- getting testy? I think I may have finally figured out your problem-
you are everything I sadi you are.


>
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> SprintPCS had
> >> >> and has a ****load of illegal immigrants on their service,
> >> >
> >> > So does Verizon.
> >>
> >> Not likely.
> >
> > Very likely.
>
> Feel free to continually libel Verizon, I've forwarded your accusations to
> the proper authorities.

That's fine- you'll get to answer for your own libelous claims, which is
what I was responding to.


>
> >
> >>What's interesting however, is you now accept my contention
> >> that a "****load" of illegal immigrants are using SprintPCS's service.
> >
> > They all do. I don't believe its a big secret
>
> Another contradiction. You acknowledge SprintPCS's involvement with
> illegal activities in this breath, and in the last attempt to refute my
> claim. Multiple personality disorder?

The claim that is being refuted has nothing to do with the customers, and at
no point do I indicate that either company is aware of having illegals in
their subscriber base. It has to do with your wildly false claims about
instructions given to you by the company. You see little boy, while I
offered an OPINION of the potential makeup of Verizon's customer base, you
stated AS FACT that Sprint instructed you to falsify subscriber
applications. In the grand scheme of things, I'm hoping that your mystery
'authorities' do contact me- this could be quite interesting.

> >
> >>
> >> Thanx Scotty.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>and I know why.
> >> >
> >> > Are you one of them?
> >>
> >> No.
> >
> > That was convincing. Maybe I'm on to something here.
>
> Crack perhaps.

I would never stoop to your level.

>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> I'll testify under oath in any courtroom in America to that effect.
> >> >
> >> > Based on your credibility here, I'm sure it would be quite the story.
> >>
> >> What an individual who can't even remain consistent within the same
> >> thread
> >> thinks of my credibility doesn't mean much.
> >
> > I'm very consistent.
>
> Consistently contradicting yourself, yes. Unfortunately that's not a
good
> trait, Scotty.

No contradictions. Maybe a sixth grade reading ability on your part, but no
contradictions here.

>
> >
> >>
> >> Now go play in traffic.
> >
> > And take all your fun away?
>
> The fun will begin while you're playing in traffic.

Wow- you're almost funny. Must be the lack of education.

>
>