Verizon is best carrier for third year. In SF Bay Area, it's 1-Verizon, 2-T-Mobile, 3-Sprint, 4-Cingular

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005
18:10:13 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:rLsnf.274458$zb5.178851@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.gnresend...
>
>> Wanna bet?
>
>Sure- if I post authoratative information (with links) that proves you
>wrong, you go away for good.
>
>Bet?

You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than nasty
comments.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

---

› See More: Verizon is best carrier for third year. In SF Bay Area, it's 1-Verizon, 2-T-Mobile, 3-Sprint, 4-Cingular

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005
> 18:10:13 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:rLsnf.274458$zb5.178851@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.gnresend...
>>
>>> Wanna bet?
>>
>>Sure- if I post authoratative information (with links) that proves you
>>wrong, you go away for good.
>>
>>Bet?
>
> You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than nasty
> comments.
>
> --

Accept the bet and my next post will contain all the proof you need. After
all, you are the one who proposed the bet. Are you now unsure of yourself?
Do you realize that you were wrong?

I know you won't accept it, as you already realize that you were wrong and
it can be proven.

So, how about it? Willing to take the bet? After all, it was your idea.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005
21:38:12 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005
>> 18:10:13 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>news:rLsnf.274458$zb5.178851@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.gnresend...
>>>
>>>> Wanna bet?
>>>
>>>Sure- if I post authoratative information (with links) that proves you
>>>wrong, you go away for good.
>>>
>>>Bet?
>>
>> You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than nasty
>> comments.

>Accept the bet and my next post will contain all the proof you need. ...

No cigar.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005
> 21:38:12 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> In <[email protected]> on Tue, 13 Dec 2005
>>> 18:10:13 -0700, "Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>news:rLsnf.274458$zb5.178851@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.gnresend...
>>>>
>>>>> Wanna bet?
>>>>
>>>>Sure- if I post authoratative information (with links) that proves you
>>>>wrong, you go away for good.
>>>>
>>>>Bet?
>>>
>>> You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than
>>> nasty
>>> comments.
>
>>Accept the bet and my next post will contain all the proof you need. ...
>
> No cigar.

I'll tell you what, John. It's the holiday season and I'm in a giving mood.
No bet needed- I'll be glad to prove your complete lack of knowledge on this
subject for free.

Now, to make it fair, I'll recap what you so loudly claimed to be the truth:

I had said, "Only partially correct, as usual- iDen will not die due to the
rebanding. iDen will still be operational for quite a while. The rebanding
will
involve moving iDen to a different range, not eliminate it."

You responded, "Wanna bet?"

Now for the facts- read real slow. I wouldn't want you miss any of the
important stuff.

http://www.911dispatch.com/info/800_...wave_info.html This page
show a map broken down into regions and with the schedule for each region.
It mentions that rebanding ends in June 2008.

http://www2.sprint.com/mr/consumerto...picId=560#qID4 This comes
directly from Sprint and in answering how long the iDen network will be
available says that it will continue to be operational through 2010.


I guess if the rebanding is completed by 2008 and the network is still
operating after that date, then rebanding won't result in the death of the
iDen network.

You were wrong- again. If you were a man, you'd admit it. I know you
won't.

Wanna bet?

John Navas wrote:
> You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than nasty
> comments.

<Cough> <Cough>

d[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Thu, 15 Dec 2005
03:24:35 GMT, DecaturTxCowboy <DTC@boogie_boggie.blog> wrote:

>John Navas wrote:
>> You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than nasty
>> comments.
>
><Cough> <Cough>

Still smoking I see.

--
Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> d[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
> In <[email protected]> on Thu, 15 Dec 2005
> 03:24:35 GMT, DecaturTxCowboy <DTC@boogie_boggie.blog> wrote:
>
>>John Navas wrote:
>>> You'll have to first prove yourself by posting something other than
>>> nasty
>>> comments.
>>
>><Cough> <Cough>
>
> Still smoking I see.
>
> --

More like second hand smoke- you are the one blowing so much of it here.