Quantcast Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics - Cell Phone Forums
This is a discussion on Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics in the alt.cellular.sprintpcs forum at Cell Phone Forums

Go Back   Cell Phone Forums > Cell Phone Service Providers > Sprint PCS > alt.cellular.sprintpcs




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-18-2006, 07:35 AM   #1
SMS
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to block
cell towers in their neighborhoods.

"http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225.htm"


Reply With Quote
Cell Phone Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-18-2006, 10:29 AM   #2
Larry
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in
news:43ce5236$0$95985$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:

> Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to
> block cell towers in their neighborhoods.
>
> "http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225
> .htm"
>


Wow...now you can turn that unused back yard space into free cellular
phones for the whole family and your own cell site paying those big land
use fees to you!

I have a friend who has a cell tower on his farm that did just that. His
farm borders the interstate and they pay him a very nice yearly fee and
provide his whole family with cellphones and service with no time limits as
part of the sweet deal....

Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 11:04 AM   #3
Juan Pablo
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:35:45 -0800, SMS
<scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

>Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to block
>cell towers in their neighborhoods.
>
>"http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225.htm"


Yes, meanwhile and afterward those same individuals are
among the first ones to ***** about "poor coverage", or
"poor reception" from within their respective residences.

For the scientifically ignorant and mentally challenged
homeowners associations and associated political idiots:

Restrictive legislation, regulation and zoning laws against
effective antennas DO NOT also change the Natural Laws of
Physics for RF energy and radio waves vs effective and
reliable communications.
This includes in addition to cell phones, also 2-way radio,
television, and WI-FI.

---Juan

Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 11:49 AM   #4
George
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


Larry wrote:
> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in
> news:43ce5236$0$95985$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:
>
>
>>Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to
>>block cell towers in their neighborhoods.
>>
>>"http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225
>>.htm"
>>

>
>
> Wow...now you can turn that unused back yard space into free cellular
> phones for the whole family and your own cell site paying those big land
> use fees to you!
>
> I have a friend who has a cell tower on his farm that did just that. His
> farm borders the interstate and they pay him a very nice yearly fee and
> provide his whole family with cellphones and service with no time limits as
> part of the sweet deal....
>


Probably tmobile, my buddy owns a building for his business and when
tmobile came into the area they made a deal with him which included free
phones. The only problem is that they have such a poor network it is
really difficult to get any value from the deal. Because of that he
uses VZW and the tmobile phones go largely unused. From other people I
know the better carriers don't offer such deals and don't pay the huge
rents that have become urban legends.
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 12:17 PM   #5
Mij Adyaw
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


Isn't it interesting that it is usually the NIMBYs that call customer
support and complain about poor cell phone coverage. This is a major victory
for all call phone providers.

"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:43ce5236$0$95985$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to block
> cell towers in their neighborhoods.
>
> "http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225.htm"



Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 12:23 PM   #6
Mij Adyaw
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


What cellular company is hosted on the farm cell tower?

"Larry" <noone@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xns974F7F0BBD4F1noonehomecom@208.49.80.253...
> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in
> news:43ce5236$0$95985$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:
>
>> Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to
>> block cell towers in their neighborhoods.
>>
>> "http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225
>> .htm"
>>

>
> Wow...now you can turn that unused back yard space into free cellular
> phones for the whole family and your own cell site paying those big land
> use fees to you!
>
> I have a friend who has a cell tower on his farm that did just that. His
> farm borders the interstate and they pay him a very nice yearly fee and
> provide his whole family with cellphones and service with no time limits
> as
> part of the sweet deal....
>



Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 12:28 PM   #7
Mike T.
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


>
> Wow...now you can turn that unused back yard space into free cellular
> phones for the whole family and your own cell site paying those big land
> use fees to you!
>
> I have a friend who has a cell tower on his farm that did just that. His
> farm borders the interstate and they pay him a very nice yearly fee and
> provide his whole family with cellphones and service with no time limits
> as
> part of the sweet deal....
>


I'd love to. Where do I sign up? Our house is close enough to an
interstate that it actually would fill a dead spot or two, if they put a
tower in our back yard. There's plenty of room back there, too. We'd STILL
have a huge back yard. -Dave


Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 12:28 PM   #8
Steve Sobol
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


George wrote:

> Probably tmobile, my buddy owns a building for his business and when
> tmobile came into the area they made a deal with him which included free
> phones. The only problem is that they have such a poor network it is
> really difficult to get any value from the deal.



Perhaps in your area - I don't have that problem with T-Mo where I live.

--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: sjsobol@JustThe.net Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 11:20 PM   #9
Larry
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


George <george@nospam.invalid> wrote in news:G4qdndMKef-rEFPeRVn-
pw@adelphia.com:

> Probably tmobile, my buddy owns a building for his business and when
> tmobile came into the area they made a deal with him which included free
> phones. The only problem is that they have such a poor network it is
> really difficult to get any value from the deal. Because of that he
> uses VZW and the tmobile phones go largely unused. From other people I
> know the better carriers don't offer such deals and don't pay the huge
> rents that have become urban legends.
>
>


No, this deal goes back into the AMPS bagphone days. He's been renting
space to them for a long time...(c;

Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 11:21 PM   #10
Larry
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


"Mij Adyaw" <mij@spam.com> wrote in news:kzwzf.14128$V.13039@fed1read04:

> What cellular company is hosted on the farm cell tower?
>


I'm not really sure, now. There are 3 candelabras of antennas up there,
now. It used to be Cellular One back in the AMPS days.

Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 06:30 AM   #11
Zman
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics


It's interesting that California does not allow this, it happens often in
Michigan.

--

"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:43ce5236$0$95985$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> Some good news for the carriers, bad news for neighbors trying to block
> cell towers in their neighborhoods.
>
>

"http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/13648225.htm"


Reply With Quote
Cell Phone Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



Similar Threads for: Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Consumer Reports Ratings are Out----Verizon top carrier in 14 outof 20 cities, T-Mobile top carrier in 3 cities SMS alt.cellular.verizon 77 12-15-2006 12:13 AM
Calif ban on holding cell while driving tmoran@acm.org alt.cellular.cingular 3 09-02-2006 04:02 PM
Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics SMS alt.cellular.cingular 9 01-19-2006 06:30 AM
Court: Calif. cities cannot block cell antennas over aesthetics SMS alt.cellular.verizon 9 01-19-2006 06:30 AM
yagi cell antennas hakelly alt.cellular 4 01-08-2006 06:24 PM


Your Ad Here


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:18 AM.

Add to MyYahoo Add to NewsGator Add to MyAOL Add to Rojo Add to Bloglines Add to NewVibes Add to Technorati Favorites Add to Google

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2004 - 2008 Sugarman Studios, LLC. All Rights Reserverd.