"Scooterflex" <scootertrasher@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7dbaf$4423a5aa$185a1e7a$4402@news.flashnewsgr oups.com...
> Didn't know that. Thanks for enlightening me. I still don't see a need.
> Email is more universal in my opinion and everyone who has internet
> access,
> phone included, has access to email.
>
>>
>> You can send SMS messages to any email address, and any email address can
>> send messages to your phone.
>>
It's like carrying a Western Union telegraph machine in your pocket.
And there is no need to set up a separate Internet access account, just to
be able to send or receive an occasional email/SMS message. For a low
volume user like me, the $.10 charge is a bargain.
I remember what it cost to send a telex, telegram, cablegram, radiogram or
even an MCI Mail message--and SMS is truly a bargain compared to those
now-defunct alternatives. Not to mention the fact that there is no need to
be tied down to a computer or teletype machine--the messages can be sent or
received anywhere while on-network.
I realize that there are now better alternatives, such as wireless Internet,
but that costs extra, and the casual user like I doesn't require full-blown
access. The occasional SMS charge makes this service a bargain.