In article <abidnW5GaaY3UNzanZ2dnUVZ_tqtnZ2d@giganews.com>, Ness-Net
<richard.no@more.damn.spam.nessnet.com> wrote:
> Google and Sprint? Rumors, or??
> (Certainly would CRUSH the iPhone)
>
> "one-ups the iPhone"
>
> http://www.eweek.com/slideshow_viewe...&po=3,00.asp?p
> =y
>
> "making the iPhone look like a modest success in comparison"
> http://www.eweek.com/slideshow_viewe...o=4,00.asp?p=y
Nope.
STUPID slides; it has nothing to do with iPhone comparisons, certainly
doesn't show that any competing product would automatically be better
or bigger than iPhone, and obviously then doesn't 'one-up' iPhone.
And how, with no product, no deal, and no specific comparisons to make,
does this _potential_ partnership already trump the success of iPhone?
Whoever wrote those is apparently just a blithering loudmouth.
Only a fool would claim such success from just a vague plan for a
potential product. He may as well name what their first-quarter sales
would be, because it's apparently _all_ imagined.