Re: NEWS: Frontline Wireless bombs out

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:53:11 +0000, Mark McIntyre
<markmcintyre@spamcop.net> wrote in
<13og0b9m0ccss56@corp.supernews.com>:

>John Navas wrote:
>> Ditto. Feel free to cite any authority that you think supports your
>> position.
>
>You apparently missed the bit where I said I really couldn't be assed to
>play with you.

I didn't think so, but thanks for the confirmation.

>I also notice you've steadfastly refused to explain why the UK's 3G
>auction was so brilliant.

On the contrary. Read more carefully.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:59:22 +0000, Mark McIntyre
<markmcintyre@spamcop.net> wrote in
<13og0ms886php4e@corp.supernews.com>:

>John Navas wrote:
>
>> They could instead put it up for sale, assuming they haven't been dumb
>> enough to overpay of course.
>
>Which of course they were.
>
>> The free market does tend to punish stupidity and reward good business
>> judgement.
>
>Reward good judgement, sure. Punish stupidity? Only when its in its
>interests.

All the time actually.

>Plenty of stupid company execs out there still getting paid
>big bucks to make stupid decisions day on day. Take a look at half of
>corporate America.

A minor blip on the radar. What matters are things like the stock price
and the ability to raise capital.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:01:07 +0000, Mark McIntyre
<markmcintyre@spamcop.net> wrote in
<13og0q3igjgi195@corp.supernews.com>:

>John Navas wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:57:53 +0000, Mark McIntyre
>> <markmcintyre@spamcop.net> wrote in
>> <13odc823dg2306e@corp.supernews.com>:
>>
>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:32:01 -0500, News <News@Group.name> wrote in
>>>> <xvmdnbcJjdutnxvanZ2dnUVZ_vTinZ2d@speakeasy.net> :
>>>>
>>>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>>>> We'll just have to agree to disagree.
>>>>> In other words, George is right.
>>>> Is that the best you can do? How childish.
>>> Given that you were unable to produce a counter-argument, one is forced
>>> to conclude you don't have one. Ergo, you lost.
>>>
>>> And how childish of you not to concede that point.
>>
>> Sorry, but you don't get to make the rules.
>
>Sorry, but you don't get to ignore how arguments work.

And there we have it.

>Actually, you do, of course - but only by tacitly admitting you've lost.

You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no matter how
ridiculous.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:1a7go3t79fccn62hcv7n2ljv9136l5134q@4ax.com:


> You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no matter how
> ridiculous.
>

Funny- I thought that was your job in these newsgroups, Navas.

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:00:08 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A22C14D33F4Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:1a7go3t79fccn62hcv7n2ljv9136l5134q@4ax.com :
>
>> You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no matter how
>> ridiculous.
>
>Funny- I thought that was your job in these newsgroups, Navas.

Sorry, but that would be your job. Thanks for playing, and see the
hostess on your way out for the consolation gift.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:43:39 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A22C8ADFC69Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:fr9go39nfp5ba80qtocvsai2mmlounmf0v@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:00:08 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
>> <Xns9A22C14D33F4Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>
>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>>news:1a7go3t79fccn62hcv7n2ljv9136l5134q@4ax.com :
>>>
>>>> You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no matter how
>>>> ridiculous.
>>>
>>>Funny- I thought that was your job in these newsgroups, Navas.
>>
>> Sorry, but that would be your job. Thanks for playing, and see the
>> hostess on your way out for the consolation gift.
>
>That would probably mean more if it came from somebody who didn't still
>refer to "Cingular" on a regular basis.

Still here? You're going to miss out on your consolation prize if you
don't hustle!

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:6jbgo39ln3a9hgeiu1lv80dcv1c7ees397@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:43:39 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
> <Xns9A22C8ADFC69Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>
>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>news:fr9go39nfp5ba80qtocvsai2mmlounmf0v@4ax.co m:
>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:00:08 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
>>> <Xns9A22C14D33F4Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>>
>>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>>>news:1a7go3t79fccn62hcv7n2ljv9136l5134q@4ax.co m:
>>>>
>>>>> You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no matter how
>>>>> ridiculous.
>>>>
>>>>Funny- I thought that was your job in these newsgroups, Navas.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but that would be your job. Thanks for playing, and see the
>>> hostess on your way out for the consolation gift.
>>
>>That would probably mean more if it came from somebody who didn't still
>>refer to "Cingular" on a regular basis.
>
> Still here? You're going to miss out on your consolation prize if you
> don't hustle!
>

No consolation prize required. Basking in the knowledge of never being you
is all the prize I need.

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:16:18 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A22D862B2FDBisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:6jbgo39ln3a9hgeiu1lv80dcv1c7ees397@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:43:39 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
>> <Xns9A22C8ADFC69Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>
>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>>news:fr9go39nfp5ba80qtocvsai2mmlounmf0v@4ax.com :
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:00:08 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
>>>> <Xns9A22C14D33F4Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>>>
>>>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:1a7go3t79fccn62hcv7n2ljv9136l5134q@4ax.c om:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no matter how
>>>>>> ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>>Funny- I thought that was your job in these newsgroups, Navas.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, but that would be your job. Thanks for playing, and see the
>>>> hostess on your way out for the consolation gift.
>>>
>>>That would probably mean more if it came from somebody who didn't still
>>>refer to "Cingular" on a regular basis.
>>
>> Still here? You're going to miss out on your consolation prize if you
>> don't hustle!
>
>No consolation prize required. Basking in the knowledge of never being you
>is all the prize I need.

Good thing you're so easy to satisfy, because you've absolutely no hope
of such an elevated state.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:0sfgo3h12m6bosfaocfl202s9vkbopkhe6@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:16:18 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote
> in <Xns9A22D862B2FDBisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>
>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>news:6jbgo39ln3a9hgeiu1lv80dcv1c7ees397@4ax.co m:
>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:43:39 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote
>>> in <Xns9A22C8ADFC69Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>>
>>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>>>news:fr9go39nfp5ba80qtocvsai2mmlounmf0v@4ax.co m:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:00:08 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal>
>>>>> wrote in <Xns9A22C14D33F4Disheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>>>>>news:1a7go3t79fccn62hcv7n2ljv9136l5134q@4ax. com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are of course free to make whatever claim you want, no
>>>>>>> matter how ridiculous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Funny- I thought that was your job in these newsgroups, Navas.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but that would be your job. Thanks for playing, and see
>>>>> the hostess on your way out for the consolation gift.
>>>>
>>>>That would probably mean more if it came from somebody who didn't
>>>>still refer to "Cingular" on a regular basis.
>>>
>>> Still here? You're going to miss out on your consolation prize if
>>> you don't hustle!
>>
>>No consolation prize required. Basking in the knowledge of never
>>being you is all the prize I need.
>
> Good thing you're so easy to satisfy, because you've absolutely no
> hope of such an elevated state.
>

1. Your well earned reputation clearly points to the fact that you are
as clueless as they come.

2. I prefer to post fact and not baseless opinion, which would put me
many rungs further up the ladder than you.

3. I don't rely on irrelevent googled material to make up the great
majority of my posts.

4. When I do use googled material, I actually read it before posting
it.

5. I'm not a technology dinosaur like you that should have been extinct
a decade ago.

6. Unlike you, I do not believe in the tooth fairy, the Easter Bunny or
extended range GSM. You should leave all these fairy tales for the
chilfren to play with.

7. I decided a long time ago to focus my attention on a single area of
expertise, whereas you have admitted to know a liitle bit of this and a
little bit of that and not a lot about anything.

8. I've worked hands-on with the technology for the great portion of my
professional career. I am called to provide technical and ops SME
review insight on a large list of operational variables to a number of
large wireless corporations. Your use of Google to amass your knowledge
has caused you to obtain false information or incomplete information
that ultimately makes you look like a clueless newbie idiot.

9.I do admit defeat- you can't define the word, much less use it in real
life application.

10. I don't demonstrate a blinded love affair with any carrier, where
you demand that Cingular is the solution to everything.


There ya go, Novice- ten reasons why it would be impossible for me to
use the elevator to go all the way down to your basement-level education
and reasoning skills


You can now go back to your hole and crawl in for the night. Yhe
predators can sense your weakness.

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:53:43 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
<Xns9A22DEBAE129Cisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:0sfgo3h12m6bosfaocfl202s9vkbopkhe6@4ax.com :

>> Good thing you're so easy to satisfy, because you've absolutely no
>> hope of such an elevated state.

> [SNIP childish ranting]

Thanks for proving my point.

Does acting like a jerk come naturally,
of do you have to work at it?

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On 1/11/08 11:13 PM, in article p1jgo3tokiggnekee15rkfp94s1bv0ssl4@4ax.com,
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:53:43 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
> <Xns9A22DEBAE129Cisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>
>> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>> news:0sfgo3h12m6bosfaocfl202s9vkbopkhe6@4ax.com:
>
>>> Good thing you're so easy to satisfy, because you've absolutely no
>>> hope of such an elevated state.
>
>> [SNIP childish ranting]
>
> Thanks for proving my point.
>
> Does acting like a jerk come naturally,
> of do you have to work at it?
Oh, lookieee!
The boys are at it again.
Children!

John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news1jgo3tokiggnekee15rkfp94s1bv0ssl4@4ax.com:

> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:53:43 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote in
> <Xns9A22DEBAE129Cisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>
>>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>news:0sfgo3h12m6bosfaocfl202s9vkbopkhe6@4ax.co m:
>
>>> Good thing you're so easy to satisfy, because you've absolutely no
>>> hope of such an elevated state.
>
>> [SNIP childish ranting]
>
> Thanks for proving my point.

Your points are never proven. Fiction doesn't lend it self to that.

>
> Does acting like a jerk come naturally,
> of do you have to work at it?
>

It comes quite naturally, particularly where the logic-challenged are
concerned.

George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:C3AE2A9B.41995%ghost_topper@hotmail.com:

>
>
>
> On 1/11/08 11:13 PM, in article
> p1jgo3tokiggnekee15rkfp94s1bv0ssl4@4ax.com, "John Navas"
> <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:53:43 -0600, CozmicDebris <isheforreal> wrote
>> in <Xns9A22DEBAE129Cisheforreal@216.196.97.136>:
>>
>>> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>>> news:0sfgo3h12m6bosfaocfl202s9vkbopkhe6@4ax.com:
>>
>>>> Good thing you're so easy to satisfy, because you've absolutely no
>>>> hope of such an elevated state.
>>
>>> [SNIP childish ranting]
>>
>> Thanks for proving my point.
>>
>> Does acting like a jerk come naturally,
>> of do you have to work at it?
> Oh, lookieee!
> The boys are at it again.
> Children!
>

And your point? Oh wait- you didn't have one. Never mind.