Quantcast A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless - Page 3 - Cell Phone Forums
This is a discussion on A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless in the alt.cellular.sprintpcs forum at Cell Phone Forums

Go Back   Cell Phone Forums > Cell Phone Service Providers > Sprint PCS > alt.cellular.sprintpcs




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-15-2008, 11:53 AM   #31
Steve Sobol
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless


["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.verizon.]
On 2008-05-15, Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote:

> And for box rental, of course- back in the good old days, cable-ready TVs
> were still a rarity.


We still rent two boxes for our two cable-ready TV's because we get premium
channels and occasionally watch pay-per-view. However, I don't rent a cable
modem (I own one that is DOCSIS compliant), and I'm eventually going to get
a couple universal remotes and give the other ones back to the cable company
and stop paying monthly for them.


--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol



Reply With Quote
Cell Phone Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-15-2008, 09:48 PM   #32
Cheapo Groovo
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless


In article <0d8bfaa2-c90e-46e4-b8b6-0b068338ef24
@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, jgrove24@hotmail.com says...
> On May 10, 11:38 am, "Pangloss" <optimist@pessimist> wrote:
> > "George Grapman" <sfgeo...@paccbell.net> wrote in message
> >
> > news:njjVj.81$hJ5.59@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > LDC wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:22:45 -0400, "Pangloss" <optimist@pessimist>
> > >> wrote:

> >
> > >>>> *Sigh* AT&T did NOT "buy out" Cingular. Cingular's parent company,
> > >>>> SBC
> > >>>> (Southwestern Bell) bought (what was left of) AT&T,and renamed
> > >>>> themselves
> > >>>> and their "Cingular" wireless divison, to "AT&T" for the name-brand
> > >>>> recognition.
> > >>> Actually they bought BellSouth which owned Cingular...

> >
> > >> That is partially correct but misleading. SBC was an owner of
> > >> Cingular since its inception. It was a joint venture between SBC
> > >> and Bell South. When SBC bought Bell South they became the sole
> > >> owner of Cingular.

> >
> > > Cingular was originally AT&T wireless. The name changed when it was sold
> > > to SBC and Bell South and we have now come full circle except for the fact
> > > that AT&T is AT&T in name only.

> >
> > Yup, in 20 years we've gone from "ATT" through seven baby bells right on
> > back to "att"....Karma I suppose....
> >
> > I wonder how much the logo design firm was paid who told them go from all
> > CAPS to lower case?

>
> Except now the HQ is in Texas, and we all know how well Texans can
> manage large organizations...hint $4 gas...JG
>


AT&T gives your info to the US govt

Why don't you wake up?

Reply With Quote
Cell Phone Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



Similar Threads for: A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A bad experience dealing with AT&T Wireless Joe alt.cellular.verizon 33 05-15-2008 09:48 PM
Experience with Pagecomm Wireless anyone? Dirty-Harry Sprint PCS 1 06-26-2007 11:02 AM
Anyone have experience with Bluetooth Wireless Adapter? djeaux alt.cellular.motorola 2 09-04-2004 03:47 PM
Re: My experience with Verizon Wireless (Bad naturally) Bob Scheurle alt.cellular.verizon 208 07-04-2004 10:03 PM
My experience with Verizon Wireless (Bad naturally) Upset alt.cellular.verizon 37 07-02-2004 06:39 PM


Your Ad Here


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 PM.

Add to MyYahoo Add to NewsGator Add to MyAOL Add to Rojo Add to Bloglines Add to NewVibes Add to Technorati Favorites Add to Google

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
©2004 - 2008 Sugarman Studios, LLC. All Rights Reserverd.