Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:d2hkh4hkojgamp1hkjmadqu99s7bqghg22@4ax.com:

> That would be us

Are you a banker?

---

› See More: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:06:10 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
<Xns9B53EB045C6ECnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:

>John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>news:d2hkh4hkojgamp1hkjmadqu99s7bqghg22@4ax.com:
>
>> That would be us
>
>Are you a banker?

I'm a voter.
--
Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>

On 12 Nov 2008 12:20:42 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:

>In message news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com, Ron
><ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> done wrote:
>
>> On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In message news:Xns9B538B839AB9Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13, Larry
>>><noone@home.com> done wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>>>> news:bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>>>>>
>>>>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>>>>> have a dividend.
>>>>>
>>>>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>>>>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>>>>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
>>>>
>>>> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
>>>>
>>>> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
>>>> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
>>>> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
>>>> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
>>>> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
>>>> again, do you?
>>>
>>>If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
>>>Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"
>>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Poor deluded fool.
>
>Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM was a
>PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.

Sorry your McSame lost, but the Governbor of Michigan is not a Crooked
CEO like Cheney was.

That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote in
news:Xns9B544AB37903AThat80sGuy@198.186.190.61:

> Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM
> was a PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.
>
>

The list of major contributors to the Obama/Democrat election reads like
the fortune 500 companys and Forbes Magazine's richest men. Their minions
contributed billions. They remain in the same control of the nation
because they maintain control of the MONEY SUPPLY and its INTEREST and have
since 1913 when the Federal Reserve Private Secret Bank Corporation was
invented by the richest bankers on Jekyll Island, GA.

Nothing has changed...only the faces and boldfaced lies to maintain the
facade of "change" while maintaining firm CONTROL of all of us with DEBT.
The whole fake system runs on control by DEBT.

Ron wrote:

> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.

Why do you think there was this huge rush to complete mergers that
reduced competition?!

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:18:12 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote:

>Ron wrote:
>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>
>Why do you think there was this huge rush to complete mergers that
>reduced competition?!

Verizon is buying Altell, Sprint tried to sell off Nextel for 6
Billion.

On 11/11/08 7:54 PM, in article Xns9B53D4BEC478Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13,
"Larry" <noone@home.com> wrote:

> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
> news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com:
>
>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>>
>>
>
> What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....
>
True. But you're dealing with a zombie here who thinks "The Magic Negro" can
walk on water...

On 11/11/08 8:50 PM, in article d2hkh4hkojgamp1hkjmadqu99s7bqghg22@4ax.com,
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:54:47 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
> <Xns9B53D4BEC478Cnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:
>
>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>> news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com:
>>
>>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>>
>> What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....
>
> That would be us, and we did throw the rascals out.
Nav-ass you ain't seen nothing yet! Kiss your 401k goodbye...

On 11/11/08 11:00 PM, in article 1nokh45t8e2h2bvnt99a5oirbmkak9940v@4ax.com,
"John Navas" <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:06:10 +0000, Larry <noone@home.com> wrote in
> <Xns9B53EB045C6ECnoonehomecom@74.209.131.13>:
>
>> John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
>> news:d2hkh4hkojgamp1hkjmadqu99s7bqghg22@4ax.com:
>>
>>> That would be us
>>
>> Are you a banker?
>
> I'm a voter.
You're a zombie, and in CA *ANYONE* can vote. You asked for it...

On 11/12/08 7:09 AM, in article 8allh4lcphkh55328gmc97sub5eg0ed19h@4ax.com,
"Ron" <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote:

> On 12 Nov 2008 12:20:42 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>
>> In message news:n6akh45oecg0t3o25pk16ufb6r07086at0@4ax.com, Ron
>> <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> done wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <clark@griswold.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In message news:Xns9B538B839AB9Anoonehomecom@74.209.131.13, Larry
>>>> <noone@home.com> done wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ron <ron.clifford@peoplepc.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:bkpih4tlbmvgtd77pgra9pajc8l46s04jh@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
>>>>>> have a dividend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
>>>>>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
>>>>>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
>>>>> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
>>>>> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
>>>>> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
>>>>> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
>>>>> again, do you?
>>>>
>>>> If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
>>>> Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"
>>>
>>> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
>>> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Poor deluded fool.
>>
>> Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM was a
>> PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.
>
> Sorry your McSame lost, but the Governbor of Michigan is not a Crooked
> CEO like Cheney was.
Rather like a Chicago politician? How wonderful.