Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Phillipe
    Guest
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Sprint has their warts


    Thats the point. If you Sprint apologists keep sugar coating them, and
    just insult me, you are no help to Sprint what so ever.



    See More: Sprint's Warts




  2. #2
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts


    "Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Sprint has their warts

    >
    > Thats the point. If you Sprint apologists keep sugar coating them, and
    > just insult me, you are no help to Sprint what so ever.


    And just what help is this newsgroup going to do for SPCS, Philly? You think
    that you are making any impact on how SPCS conducts business?

    You are off your meds ... or maybe on them @ double doses ...

    Bob





  3. #3
    Yes, Foolippe, you're lying.
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    Phillipe <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> Sprint has their warts

    >
    > Thats the point. If you Sprint apologists keep sugar coating them, and
    > just insult me, you are no help to Sprint what so ever.


    Continue lying, and I'll continue calling you out, as I've said previously.

    Now. Let's see. I apologize, I thought it was O/Siris that said this, but
    it was SPCS Tech. I quote:

    "Also, if I wanted to say:

    'Philipe, why don't you re-think your one-track thought process that is
    as monotonous as the ESN FFFFFFFF displayed in binary and call us back
    when you get some common sence'

    It is also not the word of Sprint PCS, it is my own opinion"

    The meaning of this is pretty clear to me. It's not "This is how I
    feel about you." It's "If I said this, it would be my own opinion and
    not that of my employer." Pretty standard disclaimer.

    In your followup you snip out everything except

    "Philipe, why don't you re-think your one-track thought process that is
    as monotonous as the ESN FFFFFFFF displayed in binary and call us back
    when you get some common sence"

    and post your smarmy little reply.

    And you deny being dishonest?

    You're a liar, you obviously have an agenda, and you will twist people's
    words every which way to make your point. You don't do a good job of
    twisting, either, and it's apparent to many people in this newsgroup that
    you have an agenda because you do a crappy job of hiding that fact.

    I note with some disappointment that you also recently infested
    alt.cellular.verizon and I'm waiting for you to start playing the same
    games there.

    Go ahead, Dickhead. Make an excuse for taking SPCS Tech out of context and
    turning around and using the misquote as an excuse for being a jerk. Wait.
    I know - "sprintpcs-sucks.org made me do it!"

    Or, "The voices in my head are telling me to do it!"

    Or both.

    I challenge you to reply HONESTLY to this post and tell me and the rest of
    the newsgroup regulars why you feel the need to play the little word games
    you're playing. But you won't, you'll just whine that I'm insulting you.

    Well, no. Actually, THIS is an insult:

    Philippe, although I don't believe Sprint is perfect, I think you are a low-
    life slimebag who has nothing better to do but sit at his PC, typing with
    one hand with his weenie in the other, spewing your idiocy onto Usenet. You
    need to get a life, if that is possible with the personality of a pirahna and
    the IQ of a brain-dead gnat.

    There. NOW you have a reason to complain about me insulting you. You're
    welcome.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  4. #4
    Lawrence Glasser
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    Phillipe wrote:
    >
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Sprint has their warts

    >
    > Thats the point. If you Sprint apologists keep sugar coating them, and
    > just insult me, you are no help to Sprint what so ever.


    With your "If you don't agree with me, you're wrong" attitude,
    one can only hope that your profession (assuming that you're
    old enough to work), in no way, has any influence upon the
    minds of people not old enough or intelligent enough to know
    better (e.g., elementary school children).

    Larry



  5. #5
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    So Steve ... tell us what you really think ...

    Bob

    "Yes, Foolippe, you're lying." <[email protected]> wrote in
    message news:[email protected]...
    > Phillipe <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >> Sprint has their warts

    > >
    > > Thats the point. If you Sprint apologists keep sugar coating them, and
    > > just insult me, you are no help to Sprint what so ever.

    >
    > Continue lying, and I'll continue calling you out, as I've said

    previously.
    >
    > Now. Let's see. I apologize, I thought it was O/Siris that said this, but
    > it was SPCS Tech. I quote:
    >
    > "Also, if I wanted to say:
    >
    > 'Philipe, why don't you re-think your one-track thought process that is
    > as monotonous as the ESN FFFFFFFF displayed in binary and call us back
    > when you get some common sence'
    >
    > It is also not the word of Sprint PCS, it is my own opinion"
    >
    > The meaning of this is pretty clear to me. It's not "This is how I
    > feel about you." It's "If I said this, it would be my own opinion and
    > not that of my employer." Pretty standard disclaimer.
    >
    > In your followup you snip out everything except
    >
    > "Philipe, why don't you re-think your one-track thought process that is
    > as monotonous as the ESN FFFFFFFF displayed in binary and call us back
    > when you get some common sence"
    >
    > and post your smarmy little reply.
    >
    > And you deny being dishonest?
    >
    > You're a liar, you obviously have an agenda, and you will twist people's
    > words every which way to make your point. You don't do a good job of
    > twisting, either, and it's apparent to many people in this newsgroup that
    > you have an agenda because you do a crappy job of hiding that fact.
    >
    > I note with some disappointment that you also recently infested
    > alt.cellular.verizon and I'm waiting for you to start playing the same
    > games there.
    >
    > Go ahead, Dickhead. Make an excuse for taking SPCS Tech out of context and
    > turning around and using the misquote as an excuse for being a jerk. Wait.
    > I know - "sprintpcs-sucks.org made me do it!"
    >
    > Or, "The voices in my head are telling me to do it!"
    >
    > Or both.
    >
    > I challenge you to reply HONESTLY to this post and tell me and the rest of
    > the newsgroup regulars why you feel the need to play the little word games
    > you're playing. But you won't, you'll just whine that I'm insulting you.
    >
    > Well, no. Actually, THIS is an insult:
    >
    > Philippe, although I don't believe Sprint is perfect, I think you are a

    low-
    > life slimebag who has nothing better to do but sit at his PC, typing with
    > one hand with his weenie in the other, spewing your idiocy onto Usenet.

    You
    > need to get a life, if that is possible with the personality of a pirahna

    and
    > the IQ of a brain-dead gnat.
    >
    > There. NOW you have a reason to complain about me insulting you. You're
    > welcome.
    >
    > --
    > JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]






  6. #6
    Ronkh
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts


    ^
    Steve,

    Ya need to tell us how you really feel..........

    --
    Posted at SprintUsers.com - Your place for everything Sprint PCS
    Free wireless access @ www.SprintUsers.com/wap




  7. #7
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    Bob Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
    > So Steve ... tell us what you really think ...


    Can't. I tend to sugar-coat things.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  8. #8
    tom ronson
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    but isn't sugar troll food?


    "Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    > Bob Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > So Steve ... tell us what you really think ...

    >
    > Can't. I tend to sugar-coat things.
    >
    > --
    > JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    > 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    > Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    > 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]






  9. #9
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    tom ronson <[email protected]> wrote:
    > but isn't sugar troll food?


    Yes. Guilty as charged, but I admit I've gotten to the point where I
    actually enjoy the witty repartee with this particular troll.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  10. #10
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    Phillipe wrote:
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> Sprint has their warts

    >
    > Thats the point. If you Sprint apologists keep sugar coating them, and
    > just insult me, you are no help to Sprint what so ever.


    Nor are you with your "cause" turning handle time into something enormous,
    as if it's unique to Sprint. try something for me, Phillipe. Look at your
    minute plan, and see if you can take 5:31 (just to use one of the more
    radical numbers you've posted) explaining it.

    I had four calls tonight that were almost 3 minutes each. Each one:

    > Caller: I'd like to download ringers on my Samsung A460.

    Me: Sure. It's free for the first two months, then $4/month after that.
    > Caller: Free?

    Me: For the first two months.
    > Caller: And if I cancel it?

    Me: As long as you cancel before your second bill is printed, nothing.
    You're done, and the ringers stay on your phone.
    > Caller: How many ringers do I get?

    Me: You get 8 downloads a month. Remember, though, that your phone has to
    go online to download those ringers. Without Wireless Web service, that's
    39¢/min while you do that. If you get Wireless Web service, then it treats
    your online time like a phone call, using minutes from your plan.
    > Caller: Really? And how much is that?

    Me: It's also free for the first two months, then $5/month after that.
    > Caller: And I can cancel that, too? And no charge?

    Me: Before your second bill, yes.

    Obviously, more words were used. But you tell me, Phillipe, how would I
    stretch that out beyond 5:31?
    --
    -+-
    RØß
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint
    I *don't* speak for them





  11. #11
    Evil_Ernie
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    ------------------------------------
    "O/Siris" wrote in message...
    I had four calls tonight that were almost 3 minutes each. Each one:

    > Caller: I'd like to download ringers on my Samsung A460.

    Me: Sure. It's free for the first two months, then $4/month after that.
    > Caller: Free?

    Me: For the first two months.
    > Caller: And if I cancel it?

    Me: As long as you cancel before your second bill is printed, nothing.
    You're done, and the ringers stay on your phone.
    > Caller: How many ringers do I get?

    Me: You get 8 downloads a month. Remember, though, that your phone has to
    go online to download those ringers. Without Wireless Web service, that's
    39¢/min while you do that. If you get Wireless Web service, then it treats
    your online time like a phone call, using minutes from your plan.
    > Caller: Really? And how much is that?

    Me: It's also free for the first two months, then $5/month after that.
    > Caller: And I can cancel that, too? And no charge?

    Me: Before your second bill, yes.

    Obviously, more words were used. But you tell me, Phillipe, how would I
    stretch that out beyond 5:31?
    ------------------------------------

    You...could...have...talked...like...William...Shatner.

    hehe sorry, just had to put a lame joke in there .

    Some people like to ***** just to ***** it seems. *shrug*





  12. #12
    Phillipe
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    In article <1bY2b.12661$Go4.3203@lakeread01>,
    "Evil_Ernie" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > "O/Siris" wrote in message...
    > I had four calls tonight that were almost 3 minutes each. Each one:
    >
    > > Caller: I'd like to download ringers on my Samsung A460.

    > Me: Sure. It's free for the first two months, then $4/month after that.
    > > Caller: Free?

    > Me: For the first two months.
    > > Caller: And if I cancel it?

    > Me: As long as you cancel before your second bill is printed, nothing.
    > You're done, and the ringers stay on your phone.
    > > Caller: How many ringers do I get?

    > Me: You get 8 downloads a month. Remember, though, that your phone has to
    > go online to download those ringers. Without Wireless Web service, that's
    > 39¢/min while you do that. If you get Wireless Web service, then it treats
    > your online time like a phone call, using minutes from your plan.
    > > Caller: Really? And how much is that?

    > Me: It's also free for the first two months, then $5/month after that.
    > > Caller: And I can cancel that, too? And no charge?

    > Me: Before your second bill, yes.
    >
    > Obviously, more words were used. But you tell me, Phillipe, how would I
    > stretch that out beyond 5:31?


    So, it's the exeption that proves the rule.

    Now, counter balance that with the lies Justin has been given,
    or PCS Tech ripping folks off telling them to take a Sprint phone to
    Europe when he knows it won't work cause its not GSM.



  13. #13
    SprintPCS Tech
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts



    Phillipe <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:
    > Now, counter balance that with the lies Justin has been given,
    > or PCS Tech ripping folks off telling them to take a Sprint phone to
    > Europe when he knows it won't work cause its not GSM.


    You love twisting words around????

    First, how the hell am I ripping off people if they can't use their
    phone? As for the 'try it' comment, I get asked a lot about places
    OTHER than Europe by CURRENT customers.

    A customer asks me about a country that I don't know, I'll first try to
    find an answer, and if I can't I'll suggest to take it with them and see
    if it works (the people I dealwith are smart enough to understand
    international roaming and long distance charges, too, which I do
    explain).

    How is a comment like "I don't know if your phone will work in Honduras,
    since you're already a customer, why not take it and try it, since I
    can't find an answer in my system. Just to let you know, there will be
    international roaming and long distance changes which can be a couple
    dollars a minute".

    How is that ripping someone off?

    [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]



  14. #14
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts


    "Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    <snipped>

    > So, it's the exeption that proves the rule.
    >
    > Now, counter balance that with the lies Justin has been given,
    > or PCS Tech ripping folks off telling them to take a Sprint phone to
    > Europe when he knows it won't work cause its not GSM.


    Oh, when was this issue brought up? Inquiring minds want to know ...

    Bob





  15. #15
    O/Siris .
    Guest

    Re: Sprint's Warts

    Phillipe <[email protected]> wrote in article
    <[email protected]>:

    >
    > So, it's the exeption that proves the rule.
    >
    > Now, counter balance that with the lies Justin has been given,
    > or PCS Tech ripping folks off telling them to take a Sprint phone to
    > Europe when he knows it won't work cause its not GSM.


    You're nothing if not predictable, Philly. Four calls. AVERAGE handle
    time, not rock hard limit. There's no electric shock, no escort to the
    door, and no overseer with a whip. For each of those three minute
    calls, even with that silly "limit" you stated, that gives me more
    minutes to explain something more complex to the next customer(s).

    Heck, I spent over an hour on one call helping a customer switch from
    Startacs to 8100's, upgrading his plan to be compatible with Vision
    service, and helping him understand what the plan provided. Know what?
    The guy asked to speak to supervisor to rave about me, and not only am I
    not fired for going over an hour, I even get a little goodie (nothing
    fancy. Last one was a car shade) for the call.
    --
    -+-
    RØß
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them

    [posted via phonescoop.com - free web access to the alt.cellular groups]



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast