Forger is identified

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> I'm afraid you're right Tom. But there would be something on his account
the
> next time he pulls this crap ...
>

I doubt even that. It is not the position of an ISP to be a censor,
especially in newsgroups, which makes them liable for their content.
Specific complaints change this somewhat, but unless he is proppagating
virii, committing a criminal act, spamming or what have you, your complaints
will be quickly evaluated and sent to /dev/null.

Tom Veldhouse

---

› See More: Forger is identified

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I'd still like to hear from Phil boy on why he created Richard ...
> >
> > Bob
> >
>
> You won't get an answer from Phillipe on this. It was not supposed to be
> known and it is a matter of great shame and embarrasment for the lifeless
> fool. You may get a response, but you will never get the reason why he
did
> it.
>
> Tom Veldhouse

Like either of you really wonder why he did so.

"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > I'd still like to hear from Phil boy on why he created Richard ...
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> >
> > You won't get an answer from Phillipe on this. It was not supposed to
be
> > known and it is a matter of great shame and embarrasment for the
lifeless
> > fool. You may get a response, but you will never get the reason why he
> did
> > it.
> >
> > Tom Veldhouse
>
> Like either of you really wonder why he did so.
>
Oh ... everyone knows why he did it. We just want HIM to tell us why ...

Bob

Lawrence G. Mayka wrote:

> "Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>
>>67.75.219.x address and an earthlink subscriber posting under PDT.
>>
>>Only one poster here falls under that qualifications, and they work for
>>Boeing.
>>
>>If it happens again they WILL be reported.
>
>
> I suggest you report it immediately. Forgery is a serious crime, and forgers
> belong in jail.


I find it amusing that when O/Siris presented information that someone
was forging his identity and attempting to pass "confidential" corporate
info to several websites, you were silent, but when someone merely swaps
a few headers around, you're ready to lynch them.

"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I find it amusing that when O/Siris presented information that someone
> was forging his identity and attempting to pass "confidential" corporate
> info to several websites, you were silent, but when someone merely swaps
> a few headers around, you're ready to lynch them.

I didn't see the information O/Siris presented, only the assertion, so I didn't
see a need to interject. Forgery, regardless by whom or against whom, is a
serious crime that ruins lives. Your obviously cavalier attitude toward forgery
shows that *you* are part of the problem.

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You won't get an answer from Phillipe on this. It was not supposed to be
> known and it is a matter of great shame and embarrasment for the lifeless
> fool. You may get a response, but you will never get the reason why he did
> it.

I posted this once, but you apparently didn't read it, so I have to post it
again:

Immature, boorish, perhaps bigoted people were making fun of Phillipe's name.
Phillipe responded just as millions of American immigrants and their descendants
have done for generations: He came up with an Americanized name that people
would find more difficult to make fun of.

Changing one's name--and thereby giving up one's identity, in a certain
psychological sense--is painful but sometimes necessary in the face of others'
immaturity, stupidity, and bigotry. Both my parents had to change theirs.

"Lawrence G. Mayka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > You won't get an answer from Phillipe on this. It was not supposed to
be
> > known and it is a matter of great shame and embarrasment for the
lifeless
> > fool. You may get a response, but you will never get the reason why he
did
> > it.
>
> I posted this once, but you apparently didn't read it, so I have to post
it
> again:
>
> Immature, boorish, perhaps bigoted people were making fun of Phillipe's
name.
> Phillipe responded just as millions of American immigrants and their
descendants
> have done for generations: He came up with an Americanized name that
people
> would find more difficult to make fun of.
>
> Changing one's name--and thereby giving up one's identity, in a certain
> psychological sense--is painful but sometimes necessary in the face of
others'
> immaturity, stupidity, and bigotry. Both my parents had to change theirs.
>
No ... what he did, was spoof another ID and post here, as if it was a
different person, supporting his views ...

Bob

"Lawrence G. Mayka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I posted this once, but you apparently didn't read it, so I have to post
it
> again:
>
> Immature, boorish, perhaps bigoted people were making fun of Phillipe's
name.
> Phillipe responded just as millions of American immigrants and their
descendants
> have done for generations: He came up with an Americanized name that
people
> would find more difficult to make fun of.

Oh, I read it. And we know that wasn't it. Further, he refers to his
alternate personality from his new one, and that shows he did it for a
completely different reason than you assert. And ... I don't think Richard
is more difficult than Phillipe to make fun of. It really is best to keep
quiet rather than to speak for other people, in this case, Phillipe.

>
> Changing one's name--and thereby giving up one's identity, in a certain
> psychological sense--is painful but sometimes necessary in the face of
others'
> immaturity, stupidity, and bigotry. Both my parents had to change theirs.
>
>

Good for them. However, this scenario does NOT apply to Phillipe and you
know it well.

Tom Veldhouse

Justin wrote:

> "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...


>>Uhm, reported to who, Phillipe? The great Usenet police?
>>
>>(Now I will say that forging is immature, but really... so is this
>>response).
>
>
> I've seen less mature posts from you.


Really, Justin? I haven't ever threatened to go crying to some
imaginary police state to accuse someone of the high crime of being a
jerk. I'm sure three quarters of this newsgroup would be locked up for
such an infraction if such an agency existed.

"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin wrote:
>
> > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
>
>
> >>Uhm, reported to who, Phillipe? The great Usenet police?
> >>
> >>(Now I will say that forging is immature, but really... so is this
> >>response).
> >
> >
> > I've seen less mature posts from you.
>
>
> Really, Justin? I haven't ever threatened to go crying to some
> imaginary police state to accuse someone of the high crime of being a
> jerk. I'm sure three quarters of this newsgroup would be locked up for
> such an infraction if such an agency existed.


Thanks for proving my point.

Justin Green wrote:

> "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>

>>Really, Justin? I haven't ever threatened to go crying to some
>>imaginary police state to accuse someone of the high crime of being a
>>jerk. I'm sure three quarters of this newsgroup would be locked up for
>>such an infraction if such an agency existed.
>
>
>
> Thanks for proving my point.

What, that you're a jerk?

"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin Green wrote:
>
> > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
>
> >>Really, Justin? I haven't ever threatened to go crying to some
> >>imaginary police state to accuse someone of the high crime of being a
> >>jerk. I'm sure three quarters of this newsgroup would be locked up for
> >>such an infraction if such an agency existed.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for proving my point.
>
> What, that you're a jerk?


No, that you aren't courteous.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Justin Green wrote:
> >
> > > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> >
> > >>Really, Justin? I haven't ever threatened to go crying to some
> > >>imaginary police state to accuse someone of the high crime of being a
> > >>jerk. I'm sure three quarters of this newsgroup would be locked up for
> > >>such an infraction if such an agency existed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for proving my point.
> >
> > What, that you're a jerk?
>
>
> No, that you aren't courteous.

We were told that one was locked up.

"Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Justin Green wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > >
> > > >>Really, Justin? I haven't ever threatened to go crying to some
> > > >>imaginary police state to accuse someone of the high crime of being
a
> > > >>jerk. I'm sure three quarters of this newsgroup would be locked up
for
> > > >>such an infraction if such an agency existed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for proving my point.
> > >
> > > What, that you're a jerk?
> >
> >
> > No, that you aren't courteous.
>
> We were told that one was locked up.

Yeah, there's definitely a double standard here. Sprint employees/fans can
troll, but no one else can.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, there's definitely a double standard here. Sprint employees/fans can
> troll, but no one else can.

The only Troll I ever posted was the one I posted today to demonstrate
what a Troll is.

Posting information found on the web is not trolling.