Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27
  1. #16
    Lawrence G. Mayka
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way

    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Just for catastrophic claims? One itty bitty $250 claim (after the
    > deductible) is not going to add any *Marks* on your record.


    Extremely harmful "advice" of this kind is exactly why you should not be
    extrapolating from your claimed knowledge of commercial insurance into the
    consumer area, with which you obviously have no experience. A claim of *any*
    size most certainly does put a black mark on one's record, at least with the two
    largest and most important insurers in Illinois--Allstate and State Farm. My
    Allstate agent strongly suggested that I increase my home insurance deductible
    (up to $1000, if I recall correctly), precisely because any claim smaller than
    that would needlessly damage my insurance record. Once again I point to this
    article which explicitly mentions State Farm's policy in some states of
    cancelling any home insurance policy that files two claims (of any size) within
    three years:

    http://stacks.msnbc.com/local/ose/m187626.asp





    See More: Insurance Rates again ... was disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way




  2. #17
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way


    "Lawrence G. Mayka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > Just for catastrophic claims? One itty bitty $250 claim (after the
    > > deductible) is not going to add any *Marks* on your record.

    >
    > Extremely harmful "advice" of this kind is exactly why you should not be
    > extrapolating from your claimed knowledge of commercial insurance into the
    > consumer area, with which you obviously have no experience. A claim of

    *any*
    > size most certainly does put a black mark on one's record, at least with

    the two
    > largest and most important insurers in Illinois--Allstate and State Farm.


    No experience. First off, I have made homeowner claims ... without getting
    my handslapped. Within a two year period, we had a hail storm, in the middle
    of July, where I had to have my whole house repainted. Then we lost some
    jewelry, and made a claim on matched sets. One year later, Hurricane Hugo
    passed through, where we had to have a ton of stuff fixed with the house and
    and landscaping ... My rates did not go up one iota and the carrier, Kemper
    if I recall, didn't raise our rates or deductible one iota.

    Stop calling it a black mark ... If it's being recording in a national
    database, it's just an entry ... As to those two markets, I have some
    stories to tell about Allstate and all of it negative ... Knowing what I
    know about Allstate, as a former insurance adjuster, and agent ... I
    wouldn't touch them with a 110 foot pole ... Now State Farm is ranked pretty
    high as a good market in my book.

    > My
    > Allstate agent strongly suggested that I increase my home insurance

    deductible
    > (up to $1000, if I recall correctly), precisely because any claim smaller

    than
    > that would needlessly damage my insurance record. Once again I point to

    this
    > article which explicitly mentions State Farm's policy in some states of
    > cancelling any home insurance policy that files two claims (of any size)

    within
    > three years:
    >
    > http://stacks.msnbc.com/local/ose/m187626.asp
    >

    That link is not working ...

    Bob





  3. #18
    C Roth
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way

    On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:44:23 +0000, Bob Smith wrote:

    > Stop calling it a black mark ... If it's being recording in a national
    > database, it's just an entry ... As to those two markets, I have some
    > stories to tell about Allstate and all of it negative ...


    This isn't a very smart statement for an agent to make.

    I don't believe you're an agent.




  4. #19
    Lawrence G. Mayka
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way

    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > "Lawrence G. Mayka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > http://stacks.msnbc.com/local/ose/m187626.asp
    > >

    > That link is not working ...


    It works for me, but try this one then:

    http://homes.wsj.com/buysell/taxesan...529-oster.html

    "Many insurers are also setting up powerful disincentives to filing claims.
    State Farm recently implemented a policy that says customers in its mid-Atlantic
    region may be dropped if they file two claims within three years. In addition,
    State Farm will reject any new customer who has filed even a single claim with
    another insurer in the last 36 months.
    At Travelers Property Casualty, two claims in five years will put customers on
    the radar screen. Three claims in five years, and they stand a good chance of
    getting dropped."

    "So if hail causes $700 worth of damage to your roof, consumer advocates and
    state insurance commissioners say you should think twice about calling your
    agent. It may be cheaper in the long run to cover the cost yourself."





  5. #20
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way


    "C Roth" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    > On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:44:23 +0000, Bob Smith wrote:
    >
    > > Stop calling it a black mark ... If it's being recording in a national
    > > database, it's just an entry ... As to those two markets, I have some
    > > stories to tell about Allstate and all of it negative ...

    >
    > This isn't a very smart statement for an agent to make.
    >
    > I don't believe you're an agent.


    I am an agent, and it's not called a black mark in the industry ... it's
    just called a claim entry (or something called that). Consumers might call
    it a black mark, but is certainly not called a "black mark" in the industry
    ....

    Bob





  6. #21
    C Roth
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way

    On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 14:55:50 +0000, Bob Smith wrote:

    >> I don't believe you're an agent.

    >
    > I am an agent, and it's not called a black mark in the industry ... it's
    > just called a claim entry (or something called that). Consumers might call
    > it a black mark, but is certainly not called a "black mark" in the
    > industry ...


    What we call it isn't relevant to what I was saying. We can call
    it "FISH" if you prefer.

    I'm an agent as well, as I stated earlier -- and I don't believe you are.

    If you WERE an agent, you would know perfectly well you can find good and
    bad stories about just about any company. For you to say here, in
    public, ". . . I have some stories to tell about Allstate and all
    of it negative ..." is, in my opinion, not proper and puts your claim of
    being an agent in question in my mind.

    As an agent in Florida myself, I would clearly state that any advise I
    give is only applicable in my state. You make no such distinctions and
    some of what you are stating as fact and arguing with the people here
    clearly don't apply in all areas.





  7. #22
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way


    "C Roth" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    > On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 14:55:50 +0000, Bob Smith wrote:
    >
    > >> I don't believe you're an agent.

    > >
    > > I am an agent, and it's not called a black mark in the industry ... it's
    > > just called a claim entry (or something called that). Consumers might

    call
    > > it a black mark, but is certainly not called a "black mark" in the
    > > industry ...

    >
    > What we call it isn't relevant to what I was saying. We can call
    > it "FISH" if you prefer.
    >
    > I'm an agent as well, as I stated earlier -- and I don't believe you are.
    >
    > If you WERE an agent, you would know perfectly well you can find good and
    > bad stories about just about any company. For you to say here, in
    > public, ". . . I have some stories to tell about Allstate and all
    > of it negative ..." is, in my opinion, not proper and puts your claim of
    > being an agent in question in my mind.
    >
    > As an agent in Florida myself, I would clearly state that any advise I
    > give is only applicable in my state. You make no such distinctions and
    > some of what you are stating as fact and arguing with the people here
    > clearly don't apply in all areas.
    >

    You can say all you want C Roth ... I have no clue how long you've been an
    agent ... I've been one since 83, and a claims adjuster for 4 years before
    that ... I also cover 6 states ... So, I think I know what I'm talking
    about.

    As to what you think is proper or not proper, I don't care. I know what I'm
    talking about.

    Now, as to this thread, I'm bowing out, as it's gone way off tangent to the
    newsgroup. If you want the last word, so be it ... go for it ...

    Bob





  8. #23
    C Roth
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way

    On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 17:16:26 +0000, Bob Smith wrote:

    > So, I think I know what I'm talking about.


    I wish I had a nickle every time I've been told that . . .

    > As to what you think is proper or not proper, I don't care. I know what
    > I'm talking about.


    Why do you keep repeating that phrase?

    > Now, as to this thread, I'm bowing out, as it's gone way off tangent to
    > the newsgroup. If you want the last word, so be it ... go for it ...


    Bye.





  9. #24
    norelpref
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way

    On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:44:23 GMT, "Bob Smith"

    Bob, your experience may have been like that 14 years ago when Hugo
    rolled through but things have changed greatly. Your past experience
    is not good advice now. Wether you want to believe it or not, the
    industry has changed. Everything I've read in the past 3-5 years
    about insurance comes to pretty much the same conclusion. Get a
    higher deductable and start thinking of the insurance from a
    catastophic or major loss only standpoint, not a nickel dime
    replacement poilcy. You do have some playing room with natural causes
    but not much other then that. YMMV. Maybe this is just a scare
    tactic from the industry to save some money but it got me thinking
    diffent.



  10. #25
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way


    "norelpref" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:44:23 GMT, "Bob Smith"
    >
    > Bob, your experience may have been like that 14 years ago when Hugo
    > rolled through but things have changed greatly. Your past experience
    > is not good advice now. Wether you want to believe it or not, the
    > industry has changed. Everything I've read in the past 3-5 years
    > about insurance comes to pretty much the same conclusion. Get a
    > higher deductable and start thinking of the insurance from a
    > catastophic or major loss only standpoint, not a nickel dime
    > replacement poilcy. You do have some playing room with natural causes
    > but not much other then that. YMMV. Maybe this is just a scare
    > tactic from the industry to save some money but it got me thinking
    > diffent.


    Why do you folks think I have low deductibles ..? I've already outlined what
    I have in this or another thread ... I don't even want to say how high my
    health insurance ded is ... It's high!

    Bob





  11. #26
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way


    "Lawrence G. Mayka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:Yfm6b.19453

    > "So if hail causes $700 worth of damage to your roof, consumer advocates

    and
    > state insurance commissioners say you should think twice about calling

    your
    > agent. It may be cheaper in the long run to cover the cost yourself."
    >


    And the long run is what matters. Unless your cellphone is more than $700,
    this advice certainly applies [to claiming a loss of a cell phone on your
    home owners insurance].

    Tom Velhdouse





  12. #27
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Insurance Rates again ... was Re: disturbing Sprint policy facts, learned the hard way


    "C Roth" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    > On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 16:57:32 +0000, Bob Smith wrote:
    >
    > > Tom, are you in the industry? As I explained in another thread, there

    are
    > > number of reasons why rates go up

    >
    > You need to step down a little bit.
    >
    >


    Yeah ... I never said my rates went up. They didn't.

    Tom Veldhouse





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12