Got letter today from Sprint

"Ric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> O/Siris <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> > says...
> > > Well, don't call a letter harmless when it's not.
> > >
> > > 1) It wastes customers' time and reduces their faith that the billing
> > > department will get something right.
> >
> > In the end, it *is* harmless. A stupid mistake, but a harmless one.
> >
> > > 2) It costs postage for Sprint, which they'll pass on to the customer.
> >
> > LOLOL, you're funny, Justin. Vapid, but funny.
> >
> > > 3) It brings out asses like you who feed everyone horse pockey on how
it'
> > s
> > > harmless, which is more of an insult than reading the letter in the
first
> > > place.
> >
> > Look at the inane kind of stuff you have to post in order to show
> > "harm," Justin. Do you really not see how disjointed that is?
>
>
> I have found both Phillipe or whatever he choses to call himself and
> Justin to both STRETCH the truth at least by omission.

It's also exagerating to say that the letter caused NO harm. It may not be
a direct monetary harm or cost.
I've had cell service with three different companies over the past six
years. I was never signed up for something I didn't ask for until Sprint.

> I have found
> the same type of mailings by AT&T, Cingular, and Phillipe's favorite,
> the PERFECT Verizon. I don't find any postings by either regarding
> those companies, but then that would take the wind out of their
> arguments.

How can we be guilty of stretching something by ommission when that hasn't
happened to us?


> As for JD Powers, any survey is suspect when the findings
> and the method of determining them is kept secret. I would dispute
> ANY survey under those conditions. Also, JP Powers is compensated by
> the company they rate #1 (if you don't believe me, study up on JD
> Powers!). I am an analyst and deal with numbers and statistics all
> day long and I know it is all in how you "spin" the numbers. I wait
> for Phillipe (real name?) and Justin to post something to show they
> are balanced in what they post instead of just "Venting" (since I
> really haven't seen any yet and have been surfing for sometime).


And your link is WHERE? Thanks for playing.

---

› See More: Got letter today from Sprint

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Ric) wrote:

> I have found both Phillipe or whatever he choses to call himself and
> Justin to both STRETCH the truth at least by omission. I have found
> the same type of mailings by AT&T, Cingular, and Phillipe's favorite,
> the PERFECT Verizon.

Wrong on all counts Ric. First off I am not a customer of Verizon.
Secondly if Sprint scares its customer with an incorrect letter. how is
that OK because other cellular companies make similar errors?

And we have only your word on those mailing, feel free to post some here.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Ric) wrote:

> Also, JP Powers is compensated by
> the company they rate #1 (if you don't believe me, study up on JD
> Powers!).



So why is Sprint #6 then and not number 2??

Why is Sprint still not profittable.

Why does Sprint have the highest churn rates?

Why did Consumer Reports also rate Sprint Customer Service
so low?

Why are all the Sprint apologists always saying about *2:

They shouldnt have done that
or They should have known that.
or They make that mistake commonly.


Why does Sprint still keep Excutive Services a secret?

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (Ric) wrote:

> I wait
> for Phillipe (real name?) and Justin to post something to show they
> are balanced in what they post instead of just "Venting" (since I
> really haven't seen any yet and have been surfing for sometime).


If you only want to read half my posts fine. If you think Sprint is
perfect,
thats your priveledge, others know better. Sprint will never improve and
become profitable if it and its apologists refuse to accept and improve
upon its problems. Custopmer Service is at the top of that list,
as exemplified by that "harmless" letter.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> It's also exagerating to say that the letter caused NO harm. It may not =
be
> a direct monetary harm or cost.
> I've had cell service with three different companies over the past six
> years. I was never signed up for something I didn't ask for until Sprint=
..
>=20

Here's a hint, Justin: this thread isn't about adding something without=20
someone's permission. There's the dishonesty again.

This is about a letter concerning casual usage charges. Users with=20
Vision service packs are unaffected by it. Hence no harm.

Doesn't mean it wasn't stupid to send the letter, but it was and is=20
harmless.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> If you only want to read half my posts fine. If you think Sprint is=20
> perfect,
> thats your priveledge, others know better. Sprint will never improve and=
=20
> become profitable if it and its apologists refuse to accept and improve=
=20
> upon its problems. Custopmer Service is at the top of that list,
> as exemplified by that "harmless" letter.
>=20

If you would EVER accurately respond to those with whom you disagree,=20
you'd be far more engaging, Philly. That's a double shame in your case,=20
because you've proven you're capable of it. And that means you=20
deliberately and maliciously choose to do it.

NO ONE. Not one person here, has said that Sprint is perfect.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> It's also exagerating to say that the letter caused NO harm. It may not
be
> a direct monetary harm or cost.
> I've had cell service with three different companies over the past six
> years. I was never signed up for something I didn't ask for until Sprint.
>

>Here's a hint, Justin: this thread isn't about adding something without
>someone's permission. There's the dishonesty again.


Ok, I've tried to ignore you for a few days, but now you're calling me a
liar again. You tool, it is not dishonest to post your experiences.
Perhaps that last sentence
should have ALSO read: "I've had cell service with three different
companies over the past six years. I was never sent an incorrect letter by
any of them."

Again, because I strayed slightly off topic, I'm a liar. Screw you.





>This is about a letter concerning casual usage charges. Users with
>Vision service packs are unaffected by it. Hence no harm.

Except for the total waste of their time.

>Doesn't mean it wasn't stupid to send the letter, but it was and is
>harmless.

>--
>-+-
>RŲß
>O/Siris
>I work for SprintPCS
>I *don't* speak for them.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
> Then answer simple questions, discuss the topics, and everyone's happy.
But
> that's out of your ability range.
>

Done several times, and I've given you links to them, too, and here you
sit lying about them.

Typical.

--
-+-
RŲß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

And now you've lied. You posted the link once. You NEVER listed the
reasons(pl). After that, all you would say was something like:

Blah blah blah already posted link blah blah blah already discussed it blah
blah blah liar blah blah blah lying blab blah blah blab dishonest blah blah
blah Nextel's president says so blah blah blab blah blah.

You stated there were reasons given in the article, which I read four times.
I did not see more than one reason. That reason being that that spectrum
was available for use in the US. You keep saying you posted link after link
and listed your reasons, but you're lying out your ass. All you have to do
is post the link to the thread where you listed the reasons(pl) to prove me
wrong. But you can't do that because such a link does not exist.

Again, I've offered to drop this topic twice now, and you still come back
for more, calling me a liar.

Even after I ignored you for a day or two, you're STILL posting responses to
me, calling me a liar.

Makes people wonder who's stalking who.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
>=20
> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@spr=EEntpcs.com> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> > It's also exagerating to say that the letter caused NO harm. It may no=
t
> be
> > a direct monetary harm or cost.
> > I've had cell service with three different companies over the past six
> > years. I was never signed up for something I didn't ask for until Spri=
nt.
> >
>=20
> >Here's a hint, Justin: this thread isn't about adding something without
> >someone's permission. There's the dishonesty again.
>=20
>=20
> Ok, I've tried to ignore you for a few days, but now you're calling me a
> liar again. You tool, it is not dishonest to post your experiences.

When they are irrelevant to the topic at hand, yes they are. This=20
thread has NOTHING to do with adding anything on without permission.

> Perhaps that last sentence
> should have ALSO read: "I've had cell service with three different
> companies over the past six years. I was never sent an incorrect letter =
by
> any of them."
>=20
> Again, because I strayed slightly off topic, I'm a liar. Screw you.

It wasn't that slight, and it's been so consistent that I no longer=20
believe it was accidental or inadvertant.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> And now you've lied. You posted the link once. You NEVER listed the
> reasons(pl). After that, all you would say was something like:
>=20

More dishonesty by diversion.

You asked about conversations, Justin. I posted to you at least THREE=20
examples of conversations I have had and am still having with those,=20
unlike you, who post to every thread as if the $30 you claim to have=20
been cheated out of were relevant to the topic.

I am more than capable, and multiply proven willing, to have a=20
conversation with those seekign just that. You are not one of those=20
kinds of people up to now. The possibility that you MIGHT change the=20
one and only reason you are not kill-filed long ago.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.cōm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> And now you've lied. You posted the link once. You NEVER listed the
> reasons(pl). After that, all you would say was something like:
>

More dishonesty by diversion.

WHERE? You still have NEVER listed the reasons. That is a FACT.

>You asked about conversations, Justin. I posted to you at least THREE
>examples of conversations I have had and am still having with those,
>unlike you, who post to every thread as if the $30 you claim to have
>been cheated out of were relevant to the topic.


Bull ****. I've asked you SEVERAL times to post your reasons why 1900 is
better than 800 MHz. You haven't posted CRAP about your reasons(PL) that
1900 is better. And AGAIN, you can't even post a link to show WHERE you
posted the reasons(PL), though you continue to claim that you have.

>I am more than capable, and multiply proven willing, to have a
>conversation with those seekign just that. You are not one of those
>kinds of people up to now. The possibility that you MIGHT change the
>one and only reason you are not kill-filed long ago.


I DID post my part of the conversation. All you would post is:

bla blab blah blab liar, blah blah blah blab posted already, blah blah blah
Nextel's president says so, blah blah blah.

Real discussion there, Rob.

>> Ok, I've tried to ignore you for a few days, but now you're calling me a
>> liar again. You tool, it is not dishonest to post your experiences.

>When they are irrelevant to the topic at hand, yes they are. This
>thread has NOTHING to do with adding anything on without permission.

Nothing I posted was dishonest. Off topic, a little perhaps. I did not
LIE. Do you know what a lie is, Rob? It's when YOU claim to have
discussions, when in fact all you do is call people liars.

>It wasn't that slight, and it's been so consistent that I no longer
>believe it was accidental or inadvertant.

In your opinion. And it WASN'T a lie. In six years and three carriers,
it's true, I NEVER was signed up for a service I didn't ask for, NOR did I
ever receive a screwed up letter.

Not a lie, Rob. You're obsession with proving me to be a liar is really the
only discussion you post.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> I did not
> LIE.=20
>=20

I didn't say you lied, Justin. There's the dishonesty again. The=20
deliberate distortion of posts to which you respond.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Bull ****. I've asked you SEVERAL times to post your reasons why 1900 is
> better than 800 MHz. You haven't posted CRAP about your reasons(PL) that
> 1900 is better. And AGAIN, you can't even post a link to show WHERE you
> posted the reasons(PL), though you continue to claim that you have.
>=20

Oh goodie, a two-fer special. Two examples of your dishonesty in one=20
paragraph.

First of all, I never said 1900 was better than 800. *YOU* said it was=20
always worse. I don't have to argue the exact opposite to say that's=20
wrong, Justin, and that's all I *ever* said, that it's not always worse.

Secondly, you brought up the unfounded accusation that I'm incapable of=20
conversation, Justin. Not *just* that one particular one, but of it all=20
in general. And I have posted several examples of it. Including in=20
this very thread with Nomen's response to me.

I converse all the time, Justin, with those who converse with me. but=20
if you're going to be dishonest about what I'm saying, and you have=20
indeed done exactly that, then I'm going to call you on it.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprīntpcs.com> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> I did not
> LIE.
>

I didn't say you lied, Justin. There's the dishonesty again. The
deliberate distortion of posts to which you respond.

--
-+-
RŲß
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.


"there's the dishonesty again"

No, there's you TWISTING the everloving crap out of your own words.