Current retention plans?

> No, what you *have* said, though, is to imply of anyone that points out
> what *will* happen if these plans are no longer considered a retention
> factor, is that favor some kind of prohibition against the posting of
> them. No consideration *whatsoever* that the statement being given is
> or isn't true. Only that the post to whom you're spouting at the moment
> wants them not discussed at all. Which couldn't be further from the
> truth.

WTF? I don't speak drivelese that well.


> To run in that crowd, and then deride others for being argumentative is
> a textbook case of hypocrisy.


No, I generally take a thread, make a post, and you come barreling in behind
with some nitpicky argument. You're actually quite the little *****.

Now, since you're all the sudden worried about staying on topic, how
freaking on topic was your earlier post?

"One of these days, Philly, you MIGHT actually respond to what someone
actually says to you. Not today, obviously. Jeff said the original poster
can't prevent it. He did *not* say he
likes it."

Listen Mental Midget, I know it's really hard for you to accept the fact
that you're a dumbass who can't hold a discussion. I can appreciate that.
I've had friends that weren't that bright. It was hard for them. So, I'm
sympathetic to you. I give you chance after chance to discuss a topic, and
yet, your replies to me remain incoherent drivel.

---

› See More: Current retention plans?

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:


> Listen Mental Midget, I know it's really hard for you to accept the fact
> that you're a dumbass who can't hold a discussion. I can appreciate that.

You can "appreciate" it. You just can't prove it. In fact, *you've*
been the one responding to *me*, hypocrite. For the last three days,
minimum.


--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
>
>
> > Listen Mental Midget, I know it's really hard for you to accept the fact
> > that you're a dumbass who can't hold a discussion. I can appreciate
that.
>
> You can "appreciate" it. You just can't prove it. In fact, *you've*
> been the one responding to *me*, hypocrite. For the last three days,
> minimum.


Please, don't make me repost our previous discussions, which will prove that
you don't discuss topics. Like the frequency debate, or the JD Powers
study. You insult and accuse.

"Jack F" <[email protected]> wrote:

>"Phill." <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> Sprint, good Network, poor cusromer service, and please leave the SPAM
>> message off your posatings, thank you.
>
>He's using free email from Yahoo. They add it, he can't do anything about
>it.

The fact that he has a Yahoo address in his "From" line has nothing
whatsoever to do with his Usenet posts. It's not possible to post to a
Usenet newsgroup from a Yahoo email account. He's posting through
AT&T/Comcast's news server.