Still no bill yet.

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > No i'm sorry I don't remember that discussion, but they really dont go
> > over the frequencies in training anyways.. All they basically told us
> > was that PCS is the 1900 mhz freq.
> >
>
> I am sure you don't remember Unfortunately, Google is letting me down
> looking for the original thread. But, what you said was that 800 MHz CDMA
> was simply AMPS with a digital voice codec on top of it where 1900 MHz CDMA
> was true digital and you said that is what you learned in training.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>

That was me who said that, and I was confusing that with TDMA (as I was
corrected).

[posted via phonescoop.com]

---

› See More: Still no bill yet.

"VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Musta been tech Geek then, cuz I KNOW if wasn't me.. I'm not all into
> the technical aspect of wireless technology. They don't go into THAT
> much depth in training.. I do remember hearing my trainer mention that a
> lot of the old Verizon analog network has been overlayed with digital..
> but I dont even know what that means.
>
> --
> Statements made by me are of my opinion and knowledge, and do not
> express those by Verizon Wireless(R).
> Any information I give is subject to change without notice, and may not
> be completely accurate.
>
>
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > No i'm sorry I don't remember that discussion, but they really dont
go
> > > > over the frequencies in training anyways.. All they basically told
us
> > > > was that PCS is the 1900 mhz freq.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am sure you don't remember Unfortunately, Google is letting me
down
> > > looking for the original thread. But, what you said was that 800 MHz
CDMA
> > > was simply AMPS with a digital voice codec on top of it where 1900 MHz
> > CDMA
> > > was true digital and you said that is what you learned in training.
> > >
> > > Tom Veldhouse
> > >
> >
> >
> > Tech Geek also made that statement recently.
> >
> >
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]


Yeah, we were discussing 800 MHz vs. 1900 MHz.

Musta been tech Geek then, cuz I KNOW if wasn't me.. I'm not all into
the technical aspect of wireless technology. They don't go into THAT
much depth in training.. I do remember hearing my trainer mention that a
lot of the old Verizon analog network has been overlayed with digital..
but I dont even know what that means.

--
Statements made by me are of my opinion and knowledge, and do not
express those by Verizon Wireless(R).
Any information I give is subject to change without notice, and may not
be completely accurate.


"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > No i'm sorry I don't remember that discussion, but they really dont go
> > > over the frequencies in training anyways.. All they basically told us
> > > was that PCS is the 1900 mhz freq.
> > >
> >
> > I am sure you don't remember Unfortunately, Google is letting me down
> > looking for the original thread. But, what you said was that 800 MHz CDMA
> > was simply AMPS with a digital voice codec on top of it where 1900 MHz
> CDMA
> > was true digital and you said that is what you learned in training.
> >
> > Tom Veldhouse
> >
>
>
> Tech Geek also made that statement recently.
>
>

[posted via phonescoop.com]

THANK YOU TECH GEEK!!

Now Thomas I want a apology for you ACCUSING me of something I never
said!
--
Statements made by me are of my opinion and knowledge, and do not
express those by Verizon Wireless(R).
Any information I give is subject to change without notice, and may not
be completely accurate.


[email protected] (Tech Geek) wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
>
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > "VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > No i'm sorry I don't remember that discussion, but they really dont go
> > > over the frequencies in training anyways.. All they basically told us
> > > was that PCS is the 1900 mhz freq.
> > >
> >
> > I am sure you don't remember Unfortunately, Google is letting me down
> > looking for the original thread. But, what you said was that 800 MHz CDMA
> > was simply AMPS with a digital voice codec on top of it where 1900 MHz CDMA
> > was true digital and you said that is what you learned in training.
> >
> > Tom Veldhouse
> >
>
> That was me who said that, and I was confusing that with TDMA (as I was
> corrected).
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> THANK YOU TECH GEEK!!
>
> Now Thomas I want a apology for you ACCUSING me of something I never
> said!
> --


Good luck. Thomas will likely just call you a liar and then plonk you.

"Tech Geek" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
>
> That was me who said that, and I was confusing that with TDMA (as I was
> corrected).
>

Alright. The thread dropped dead after that.

VZW Guy, I really thought it was you, and I was wrong. I sincerely
apologize for the misattributed reference and the corresponding accusation.

Tom Veldhouse

"VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> THANK YOU TECH GEEK!!
>
> Now Thomas I want a apology for you ACCUSING me of something I never
> said!

I already did it. You are welcome.

Tom Veldhouse

Apology is accepted.. Thank you.

--
Statements made by me are of my opinion and knowledge, and do not
express those by Verizon Wireless(R).
Any information I give is subject to change without notice, and may not
be completely accurate.


"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Tech Geek" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > >
> >
> > That was me who said that, and I was confusing that with TDMA (as I was
> > corrected).
> >
>
> Alright. The thread dropped dead after that.
>
> VZW Guy, I really thought it was you, and I was wrong. I sincerely
> apologize for the misattributed reference and the corresponding accusation.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>
>

[posted via phonescoop.com]

Geez! Civility returning to this newsgroup?
Things are changing for the better.
Thanks to all involved.
If this keeps up I may have to relax my kill filters a bit. :-)
---JRC---

"VZW Guy" <[email protected]> wrote in message =
news:[email protected]...
> Apology is accepted.. Thank you.
>=20
>=20
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >=20
> > "Tech Geek" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >=20
> > >
> > > That was me who said that, and I was confusing that with TDMA (as =
I was
> > > corrected).
> > >
> >=20
> > Alright. The thread dropped dead after that.
> >=20
> > VZW Guy, I really thought it was you, and I was wrong. I sincerely
> > apologize for the misattributed reference and the corresponding =
accusation.
> >=20
> > Tom Veldhouse
> >=20
>=20

"John R. Copeland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Geez! Civility returning to this newsgroup?
Things are changing for the better.
Thanks to all involved.
If this keeps up I may have to relax my kill filters a bit. :-)
---JRC---


I'm still waiting for Rob to apologize.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (VZW Guy) wrote:

> Musta been tech Geek then, cuz I KNOW if wasn't me.. I'm not all into
> the technical aspect of wireless technology. They don't go into THAT
> much depth in training..

That explains a lot.

And what does that explain?? I may not now technical stuff, becuase i'm
not trained for technical issues, thats why they have TECH SUPPORT.. but
I still bet my the majority of the answers I give on non-tech related
question sare correct, and less that half of your are. You act like you
know all about everything, when ya don't and I already proven you wrong
on at least 1 thing so far, because you insist of getting information
from half a$$ed website "claiming" the answers are coming from employyes
or former employees of a company when there is no proof they are.

--
Statements made by me are of my opinion and knowledge, and do not
express those by Verizon Wireless(R).
Any information I give is subject to change without notice, and may not
be completely accurate.


"Phill." <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (VZW Guy) wrote:
>
> > Musta been tech Geek then, cuz I KNOW if wasn't me.. I'm not all into
> > the technical aspect of wireless technology. They don't go into THAT
> > much depth in training..
>
> That explains a lot.

[posted via phonescoop.com]