"Tech Geek" <pcsguy@NOSPAM.bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:vn1s176q231b70@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
> "Justin Green" <justin@cjteam.com> wrote in article
> <vn1qeoepamtlcd@corp.supernews.com>:
> >
> >
> > ****ing plonk me then and get on with your life. I'm not here to
impress
> > Steven, and I'm camn sure not here to impress you. If you want to take
a
> > side, take a side. I don't care. I'm trying to get the Mental Midget
to
> > finish a discussion. If that bothers you then plonk me. When Rob
admits
> > that he can't back up any of his worthless **** and stops accusing me of
> > lying without being able to prove anything, then I'll leave. Otherwise,
> > filter me out and move on with your life. You're not a moderator and
you
> > certainly haven't added anything to THIS "discussion".
> >
> >
>
> Like I've said before, some of us don't have the availability of a
> killfile, so we have to wade though what was a good discussion, through
> a couple dozen replies of name calling, just to dig up that one post
> somewhere in the middle that actualy has information in it.
>
> This is complete immaturity, and these flame wars are unneeded. If you
> feel the uncontrollable urge to post a flame war, or continue in one, at
> least have the consideration to add an "OFF TOPIC: in the subject line,
> or change the subject.
>
> I've learned long ago that its not worth it getting involved with these
> feuds, its POINTLESS. The whole, "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude
> won't get you anywhere and will just piss off the other posters here.
> People still take stabs at me, yet I'm mature enough to ignore them, I
> left the name calling attitude back in elementary school. (And yes,
> continuing the name calling just shows everyone else your lack of
> maturity).
>
> All these "This is a pointless reply" or "This does not help" posts
> don't belong. If you wish to debate things, go right ahead, but
> stooping down to the level of name calling just shows how uneducated you
> are and is taken as a submission.
>
> This is not directed to one person, but to everyone involved. At least
> have the consideration to add a "OFF TOPIC" to the subject thread so
> those of us who are sick of reading though this senceless flame war, we
> can ignore those posts.
>
> Oh, and you're also giving this Usenet service (alt.cellular.sprintpcs)
> a very bad name and reputation due to all this arguing. Just quit it
> and go on with your life. There are more important things in life than
> getting the last word in a senceless argument over the internet, and if
> it is the worst thing in your life, then you must have a pretty good
> life, or no life at all.
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]
Ok, you can take Rob's side as well, since you seem to only want to lecture
me. Fine. Go out, download a newsreader and plonk me. All I'm trying to
do is get Rob to finish discussing his baseless accusations. He works for
SprintPCS, so this is just as much a reflection on Sprint as it is me. And
the fact that you and others take his side, lecture me/don't lecture him is
just as bad, even if you throw in the disclaimer that "this is not directed
to one person". You've said this several times already, usually as a reply
to me, so it's more than obvious that you're taking Rob's side. Maybe he's
your supervisor or something.
I could care less if SprintPCS or this forum has a bad name. All I care
about is getting Rob to actually finish a discussion instead of following me
around calling me a liar, following me to another forum to start crap, etc.
You're wading through his crap, too, and he apparently want's to stick
around for a while.
So, unless you're going to lecture Rob as well, go get a newsreader and
plonk me, or shut up. Because I don't intend on listening to any more of
your lectures.