Results 16 to 22 of 22
- 10-07-2003, 08:07 PM #16William BrayGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
I didn't have a bedsheet then. And your point is?
I have a son and two brother in laws over there right now. They report
that the only WMD is what they they imported. But again, what does this
have to do with cell phones?
[email protected] (Watch Your Back) wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> 1988? You weren't even a stain on the bed sheets in 1988.
>
>
> >
> > Having them in 1988, is not the same as having them in 2003.
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]
[posted via phonescoop.com]
› See More: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
- 10-07-2003, 08:43 PM #17Al KleinGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 03:43:20 -0000, [email protected] (Jason
Voorhes) posted in alt.cellular.verizon:
>Doesn't this place have administrators?
soc.college.admissions, one of the newsgroups to which this thread is
being promulgated, probably does. The rest are all unmoderated.
- 10-07-2003, 08:44 PM #18Al KleinGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:11:48 -0000, [email protected] (Watch Your Back)
posted in alt.cellular.verizon:
>1988? You weren't even a stain on the bed sheets in 1988.
Says someone with all the verbal grace of a 15 year old.
- 10-08-2003, 06:51 AM #19Camile CardenasGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (William Bray) wrote:
> I didn't have a bedsheet then. And your point is?
> I have a son and two brother in laws over there right now. They report
> that the only WMD is what they they imported. But again, what does this
> have to do with cell phones?
Bush lied. Powell's whole Feb speech to UN now discredited
So far dribbled out... and admitted to:
Aluminum tubes not for Uranium
Mobile Labs not for BioWeapons
No Uranium purchase from Niger
Drones not for weapons
Nuclear program still buried under rose bushes
No Smallpox found
Only 2 SCUDs found
- 10-09-2003, 05:45 AM #20StuartGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
"Camile Cardenas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (William Bray) wrote:
>
> > I didn't have a bedsheet then. And your point is?
> > I have a son and two brother in laws over there right now. They report
> > that the only WMD is what they they imported. But again, what does this
> > have to do with cell phones?
>
> Bush lied. Powell's whole Feb speech to UN now discredited
But on the positive side CDMA has been kept out of Iraq
Frankly nearly all the rest of the world were believing that back in
February - but to say so was to put you in league with 'global terrorism' or
just Dubya's bad books (as the French & German governments found to their
cost).
The issue is that it would seem no matter how little evidence emerges of
deployable WMD - the US/UK governments are not going to admit they went to
war on a false premise (whether they knew that at the time or not). But then
politicians of any country don't often admit to being wrong and in this case
would have nasty legal implications.
Which makes this whole arguement sterile. Unlike the present situation in
Iraq. I'm sure most sensible Americans realise that the greatest bar to
international co-operation and reconciliation is sitting in the White House.
And the rest of the world can do little about that. Only, perhaps, the
American electorate in 2004.
That is the issue. And 95%(?) of the world's electorate can only be
spectators. Doesn't say much about democracy - does it?
--
Stuart
- 10-09-2003, 06:38 AM #21Sergei KosonovGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
In article <[email protected]>,
"Stuart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Doesn't say much about democracy - does it?
Gore won in 2000, so there you are.
Just reading Al Franken's book. It's wonderful.
- 10-09-2003, 09:29 AM #22reasonGuest
Re: The Murderous Lies of Bush, Blair and the Jew Cabal
Sergei Kosonov <[email protected]> wrote in news:skosonov-
[email protected]:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Stuart" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Doesn't say much about democracy - does it?
>
> Gore won in 2000, so there you are.
>
> Just reading Al Franken's book. It's wonderful.
>
I can't help responding to those who are so uninformed about the US and its
governmental formation.
The electoral college elects the president. The number of delegates are
determined based on state populations, and selected by the candidate who
win the state (by whatever margin). The votes that are counted are
determined by the town/city/county/etc supervisor of elections. In
Florida, where I suspect that the complainer is referring to, the three
main counties where there were concerns (Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm
Beach) recounted ballots. However, the Secretary of State is the one to
certify the elections (ie. supposed to have the final say to verify that
the process and results are fair and accurate).
OPINION: The fact that ANY of the courts were involved shows how the US
society is far too litigious
The steps were followed in Florida, and the votes were appriately counted.
The people who complained about difficult ballots should complain to the
DEMOCRAT who ran the Palm Beach County elections.
Basically, it wasn't the chads that were the problem in Florida, it was
voters who were bussed to the polls and told who to vote for -- without any
education on HOW to physically vote.
Like it or not, the US has a very logical (and mostly fair) method for
electing/recalling/impeaching officials. Those who feel that Bush has done
poorly should double their efforts to find a successor they prefer; those
who feel that Bush has done an admirable job despite extremely difficult
situations should ensure they get their message out.
Similar Threads
- Verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.ericsson
Real estate investment in the UAE
in Chit Chat