Lack of sources

"Camile Cardenas" <cccardenas@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:cccardenas-A0E35C.12373607102003@news04.east.earthlink.net...
> In article <df2429eafe3e2e743d03bc6c7b640a94@news.teranews.co m>,
> "Justin" <justinnomorespam@cjteem.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Mr T" <mrt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:vo5sccavm59r3a@corp.supernews.com...
> > > Who cares if Sprint's last? Maybe you do, being that you're obsessed
> > > with Sprint. I don't care.
> >
> >
> > All I'm pointing out is that you don't know how to do your research.
You
> > made a wiseass comment about all JD Powers survey said was who ranked
first.
> > I corrected you.
>
> Justin - Notice how he cross posts to other cellular Newsgroups. Then
> O/Siris wonders why same complaints are coming up on JD Power in other
> newsgroups?
>
> Same folks in denial in all groups.
>
> Sprint ranks last. Potential Customers need to know what they're in for.
>
> Upselling
> reconditioned goods sold as new
> Incorrect coverage maps
> Involuntary contracts
> Extra fees for extra revenue
> Customer Service whose job it is to sell
> Billing errors (on purpose it seems sometimes).


What *completely* amazes me is how many people blatently post that JD Powers
takes kickbacks, yet offer no proof. No article, no personal experience,
etc., and then expect you to just disregard the study as bogus.

I'd be willing to take a more open minded look at JD Powers were the people
bashing it providing some sort of evidence to back up their rather serious
claims. It looks like pure BS spin to make such claims and provide no
support.

I'm going to shock everybody and agree with Justin. I see posts saying
that they're paid off but never by whom and never any proof.

"Justin" <justinnomorespam@cjteem.com> wrote in article
<ccbd6d9c585aecf345cc9758e63e9f0a@news.teranews.co m>:
>
> "Camile Cardenas" <cccardenas@netscape.com> wrote in message
> news:cccardenas-A0E35C.12373607102003@news04.east.earthlink.net...
> > In article <df2429eafe3e2e743d03bc6c7b640a94@news.teranews.co m>,
> > "Justin" <justinnomorespam@cjteem.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > "Mr T" <mrt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:vo5sccavm59r3a@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > Who cares if Sprint's last? Maybe you do, being that you're obsessed
> > > > with Sprint. I don't care.
> > >
> > >
> > > All I'm pointing out is that you don't know how to do your research.
> You
> > > made a wiseass comment about all JD Powers survey said was who ranked
> first.
> > > I corrected you.
> >
> > Justin - Notice how he cross posts to other cellular Newsgroups. Then
> > O/Siris wonders why same complaints are coming up on JD Power in other
> > newsgroups?
> >
> > Same folks in denial in all groups.
> >
> > Sprint ranks last. Potential Customers need to know what they're in for.
> >
> > Upselling
> > reconditioned goods sold as new
> > Incorrect coverage maps
> > Involuntary contracts
> > Extra fees for extra revenue
> > Customer Service whose job it is to sell
> > Billing errors (on purpose it seems sometimes).
>
>
> What *completely* amazes me is how many people blatently post that JD Powers
> takes kickbacks, yet offer no proof. No article, no personal experience,
> etc., and then expect you to just disregard the study as bogus.
>
> I'd be willing to take a more open minded look at JD Powers were the people
> bashing it providing some sort of evidence to back up their rather serious
> claims. It looks like pure BS spin to make such claims and provide no
> support.
>
>

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"Mr T" <mrt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vo5vpl7f46kea8@corp.supernews.com...
> I'm going to shock everybody and agree with Justin. I see posts saying
> that they're paid off but never by whom and never any proof.


And that's all I'm asking for. And I did do a limited search for such
evidence, admittedly only about 2 or 3 minutes worth, but I didn't find
anything. It's much easier when the claimant provides the sources.