Stock price reflects Wall Street Concern

SprintPCS stock price crashed when it released July-Sept results. Still losing
money, still adding customers at lowest rate of big six, therefore losing
market share, and still highest churn rate of Big six.
Still predicted to be a WLNP loser.

Apologists can spin it all you want that its no big deal, divert attention by
arguing churn numbers, but Wall Street sees it differently, and when push comes
to shove its not that Sprint stock is a bargain now, and not one of the Sprint
apologists has come back and bragged on how much SprintPCS stock they bought at
the new "bargain" prices.

I like my SprintPCS phone, and locally coverage is no worse than other
carriers, and I got a killer retention deal, so I don't want to see SprintPCS
fail, but at the rate it's going it will, just like Sprint Ion. I look at
SprintPCS's quarterly report with my head, not my heart.

---

› See More: Stock price reflects Wall Street Concern

CAT0NHAT wrote:


>
> I like my SprintPCS phone, and locally coverage is no worse than other
> carriers, and I got a killer retention deal, so I don't want to see
> SprintPCS fail, but at the rate it's going it will, just like Sprint Ion.
> I look at SprintPCS's quarterly report with my head, not my heart.

And when you look with your head, try to fit your brain into the equation
(it shouldn't hurt too bad).

CAT0NHAT wrote:

> SprintPCS stock price crashed when it released July-Sept results. Still
> losing money, still adding customers at lowest rate of big six, therefore
> losing market share, and still highest churn rate of Big six.
> Still predicted to be a WLNP loser.
>
> Apologists can spin it all you want that its no big deal, divert attention
> by arguing churn numbers, but Wall Street sees it differently, and when
> push comes to shove its not that Sprint stock is a bargain now, and not
> one of the Sprint apologists has come back and bragged on how much
> SprintPCS stock they bought at the new "bargain" prices.
>

Nobody has spun a thing- we just ask you to make an accurate protrayal when
you open your mouth. And while you're at it, why don't you respond to the
many questions awaiting you in other threads? Too scared? Too stupid?
Answers way above your knowledge base? Or do they shoot a bunch of holes
in your personal crusade to both trash Sprint and make yourself look like
an idiot?

On 02 Nov 2003 13:25:08 GMT, [email protected] (CAT0NHAT) said:

>and not one of the Sprint
>apologists has come back and bragged on how much SprintPCS stock they bought at
>the new "bargain" prices.

As a SprintPCS customer, can you tell me why I should care if Sprint
files bankruptcy and goes into the tubes? Even though you won't
reply with why, it would be nice if you then take it one step further
and expain how complaining about it in 10 different forms 10 times a
day in multiple threads can change the outcome in way shape or form.
It's very obvious by your posts that any dumb**** with a computer can
take a few select links and be an armchair economist and a PR
spinmaster. Using your style of selective quoting and linking,
selective ignoring of context and certain facts, and good old fashion
PR spin, you could probably "prove" the existance of UFO's too. I
suggest you take your crusade further and picket in front of a local
Sprint store down there in TX with a sign and bullhorn and if they
ignore you too, flash them your newly bought Verizon shares (you did
follow your own advise from your reseach skillZ and buy some right?).
I would suggest you take multiple shirts with you and you can change
clothes often, you may be able to fool some of them with that trick.

Insulting me does not make SprintPCS profitable. Poor Sprint apologist,
resorting to changing the subject by attacking the poster.

I am not trashing Sprint, merely reporting that Wall Street has. Sorry you
can't handle that.

> I would suggest you take multiple shirts with you
> and you can change clothes often,

I change clothes daily. It is coming up to January, time for you to change
again?

CAT0NHAT wrote:

> Insulting me does not make SprintPCS profitable. Poor Sprint apologist,
> resorting to changing the subject by attacking the poster.

You're right- it doesn't make Sprint profitable (which is something out of
both of our controls). But it does point to the stupidity of your posts,
and lack of knowledge about anything to do with the industry.

CAT0NHAT wrote:

> I am not trashing Sprint, merely reporting that Wall Street has. Sorry you
> can't handle that.


Many things come out of your mouth that are not mentioned by Wall Street,
and all of them are never backed up with hard facts.