Kyocera 2325 reception -- how is it?

What's the reception like on the Kyocera 2325?

Better than the LG VX4400?

Thanks.

---

› See More: Kyocera 2325 reception -- how is it?

Dave,
The two phones have the exact same Qualcomm CDMA chips, so any
difference SHOULD be minor. However, user experiences do seem to vary
and I don't know why. Often it's only the difference in how the "bars"
look.

Kyocera phones were formerly Qualcomm phones, so they've been good. LG
hasn't always been so, but improved substantially a few years ago.

I would decide more on features and graphic interface.

-Bill Radio

Western U.S. Wireless Reviews & Ratings:
http://www.MountainWireless.com


davem3791@aol.com (DaveM3791) wrote in article
<20030917023559.03448.00000967@mb-m11.aol.com>:
> What's the reception like on the Kyocera 2325?
>
> Better than the LG VX4400?







[posted via phonescoop.com]

On 9/17/03 12:16 PM, in article vmh26deanksgd2@corp.supernews.com, "Bill
Radio" <Bill@MountainWirelessNOSPAM.com> wrote:
> Kyocera phones were formerly Qualcomm phones, so they've been good. LG
> hasn't always been so, but improved substantially a few years ago.
My TM-510 was one of my best phones, and I've had quite a few...
Motorola DPC-550
Nokia 232
Nokia 2160i
Ericsson GSM Flip (had it 1 week)
Nokia 5190
Nokia 6190
StarTac 7797
Ericsson RX280LX (AT&T Internet phone)
LG-TM 510
Motorola T720

The Wife has had:
Nokia 6160
Nokia 8260
Kyocera 2235

The Nokias were ****, and it wasn't till I went to a Non-Nokia did I realize
how bad they were - where it counts - reception.