MHS

Hi,
It's crunch time for getting the phone.
I don't need additional memory, cameras or MP3 files.

Just reliability and reception.

Razr users like the reception.
Has anyone compared the two for reception. From the reviews, the 815 is
great, but how does the Razr compare.

Thanks

 

jdoe

I used one in europe. When it got reception it was crystal clear and better
than any cell phone I'd ever used (from any brand) but that was the rub.
Manytimes when those around me (same carrier) had good reception the razr
had none. NOw I realize that it was gsm in europe but I can't help but
wonder if the same would hold here on the cdma version.
"MHS" <msiegel(nospam)@cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3ZVtf.15345$Pi.2351@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
> Hi,
> It's crunch time for getting the phone.
> I don't need additional memory, cameras or MP3 files.
>
> Just reliability and reception.
>
> Razr users like the reception.
> Has anyone compared the two for reception. From the reviews, the 815 is
> great, but how does the Razr compare.
>
> Thanks
>
>

Quick

MHS wrote:
>
> Razr users like the reception.

Really? I haven't heard any yet.
Makes sense since it has a stub antenna. I assume
you are referring to CDMA?

-Quick

Steve O

On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:21:35 +0000, MHS wrote:

> Hi,
> It's crunch time for getting the phone.
> I don't need additional memory, cameras or MP3 files.
>
> Just reliability and reception.
>
> Razr users like the reception.
> Has anyone compared the two for reception. From the reviews, the 815 is
> great, but how does the Razr compare.
>
> Thanks

Got both in NYC...
No contest as the E815 wins hands down for reception.
The Razr is kool looking, light and cute but the for functionality the
e815 blows it away. The keypad on the razr sucks BTW. The hinge on the
e815 is so-so.
Overall, if you want a decent phone with style go for the razr.
If you want a solid phone with superb reception go for the e815.

Robert

Outside of areas requiring analog, my razr performs better than my 710, in
my non-scientific evaluaton.


In message <YNYtf.60617$tV6.35927@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net> , "Quick"
<quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
> MHS wrote:
> >
> > Razr users like the reception.
>
> Really? I haven't heard any yet.
> Makes sense since it has a stub antenna. I assume
> you are referring to CDMA?
>
> -Quick
>

--
Posted with Ink Spot (for PocketPC) from DejaVu Software, Inc.
Usenet wherever you are - http://www.dejavusoftware.com/

Elector

"MHS" <msiegel(nospam)@cinci.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3ZVtf.15345$Pi.2351@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
> Hi,
> It's crunch time for getting the phone.
> I don't need additional memory, cameras or MP3 files.
>
> Just reliability and reception.
>
> Razr users like the reception.
> Has anyone compared the two for reception. From the reviews, the
> 815 is great, but how does the Razr compare.
>
> Thanks
>
>

Well it gives me better reception in the Empire State Plaza where I
never had service before. (All marble and steel in the plaza) then
again My Vx4400 never had good reception there. Also better reception
down NYC way so reception is better. Cannot say for any other
comparison model. Sorry.

Elector