I have the Moto e815, which was top-rated by CR.
It's not without faults, but the reception is excellent, the camera is very
good, and I bought the little "MicroSD" memory card, and have transferred
many photos from the phone to my PC without a problem. Overall, I'm quite
happy with the phone. You'll see many posts about "hacking" the phone to
enable features, all I've done to mine is disable
EVDO in order to improve
battery life. This was done completely with the keypad, no USB cables or
software, and worked exactly as advertised. It's not a "hack", just a
setting change.
It's a balance thing. The Motorolas of late have the best reputations for
reception, but they also seem to have more software/firmware issues, ie; the
e815 is known to have a rebooting problem when sending text messages. The
camera occasionally freezes the phone up. Most of the issues are annoying,
but not fatal. The LG's have a poorer general reputation for reception, but
I've seen few if any SW/FW issues reported. The Samsungs seem to fall in
between. These three brands appear to make up the majority of phone reviews
I found when researching for my last phone.
I found the Moto v325 very appealing, especially since it still has analog,
but after trying out a friends 815 with Bluetooth, I had to have BT for use
in the car. I'm not sorry, so far. I don't recall the camera resolution of
the 325, but if BT isn't an issue, give it a good long look.
HTH,
Dean
_______________________________________
"Kyle

)" <GoSensGo@BringHomeTheCup.com> wrote in message
news:17idnXme0cKCHO3Z4p2dnA@adelphia.com...
> I'm not a Verizon user yet - but my contract with Sprint ends in less than
> a month and I am considering switching to Verizon. My wife and I live out
> in a rural community in Toledo, OH and her brother has Verizon and gets
> decent reception when visiting our house - whereas we're lucky to get even
> one bar on our Sprint phones. This means we have to invest in a landline
> and means extra costs we'd rather not have.
>
> So we are looking for a phone that Verizon offers that is known to have
> great reception. We did the same thing with Sprint 2 years ago, but their
> towers just are not in the right places for even one of their better
> phones.
>
> I am also looking to get a phone, with great reception, that is a camera
> phone. I want to get something that is easy-to-use, offers very clear and
> high-resolution pics, and does not require a "service" to transfer photos
> from phone to PC. I've heard from some users of camera phones that
> certain phones require you to transfer via a "pay-per-use" service while
> others just require a USB-cable.
>
> I've tried to look on Consumer Reports website for help, but most of the
> phones they are listing are out of date. So I'm hoping for either a
> website that is similar to CR in its unbiased reporting - or for some
> testimonials from actual users that have good luck with their own phones.
> Any help you can give myself and my wife would be greatly appreciated!
>
> --
> Kyle
)
>
> Reply address is fake. Don't ask for the real one, a troll named Lookout
> sent enough spam and viruses that I shut it down.
>