John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote in
news:eb22t257gcjcpsk9gcl10hl2grfh243btj@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:26:28 GMT, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob>
> wrote in <UA7Ah.875$tD2.713@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.ne t>:
>
>>John Navas wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:31:47 GMT, DTC <no_spam@move_along_folks.foob>
>>> wrote in <no2Ah.783$x74.655@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.ne t>:
>>>
>>>> John Navas wrote:
>>>
>>>>> This is, of course, another wishful claim with no real foundation.
>>>> Like Extended GSM, huh?
>>>
>>> Not at all -- Extended Range GSM is real.
>>
>>I'll rephrase that...
>>
>>Any citations of its deployment by U.S. carriers?
>
> Nope. Just my own experience.
So, all you have is biased, anecdotal fairy tales to back up your claim.
Sorry- not enough.
>
> Any citations to the contrary?
Of course there are- companies are always eager to talk about technology
they are not using.
You really must be that stupid.
Linear Mode
