Re: Here comes the cell phone ad disaster!

4phun wrote:
> Here comes the cell phone ad disaster
> http://www.computerworld.com/action/...8&pageNumber=1
>
> Fascinating article
>
> "Here are just some of the conduits through which advertising will
> enter into your cell phone:

The sky is not falling!!
My cell phone is listed on the National "do not call list" & you
should do the same thing. The "do not call list" is now permement with
no experation date.

Tom J

Tom J wrote:
> 4phun wrote:
>
>>Here comes the cell phone ad disaster
>>http://www.computerworld.com/action/...8&pageNumber=1
>>
>>Fascinating article
>>
>>"Here are just some of the conduits through which advertising will
>>enter into your cell phone:
>
>
> The sky is not falling!!
> My cell phone is listed on the National "do not call list" & you
> should do the same thing. The "do not call list" is now permement with
> no experation date.


R-i-g-h-t. That works SO WELL... NOT.

News wrote:
> Tom J wrote:
>> 4phun wrote:
>>
>>> Here comes the cell phone ad disaster
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/...8&pageNumber=1
>>>
>>> Fascinating article
>>>
>>> "Here are just some of the conduits through which advertising will
>>> enter into your cell phone:
>>
>>
>> The sky is not falling!!
>> My cell phone is listed on the National "do not call list" & you
>> should do the same thing. The "do not call list" is now permement
>> with no experation date.
>
>
> R-i-g-h-t. That works SO WELL... NOT.

SO?? I don't get those type calls on my home phone OR my cell phone??
Works for me!!

Tom J

4phun wrote:
> On Jun 16, 11:05 am, "Tom J" <tomn...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> 4phun wrote:
>>> Here comes the cell phone ad disaster
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/...viewArticleBas...
>>
>>> Fascinating article
>>
>>> "Here are just some of the conduits through which advertising will
>>> enter into your cell phone:
>>
>> The sky is not falling!!
>> My cell phone is listed on the National "do not call list" & you
>> should do the same thing. The "do not call list" is now permement
>> with no experation date.
>>
>> Tom J
>
> Actually all my phones have been registered with DO NOT CALL. I
> still
> received a text message in a shopping center a month ago from some
> local robot that sensed my nearby cellphone. I thought it was neat
> and
> at the same time I was annoyed that they could do that.

You thought it was neat, but I wouldn't. They would hear from me & not
as a customer either!

Tom J

News wrote:
>
>
> Tom J wrote:
>> 4phun wrote:
>>
>>> Here comes the cell phone ad disaster
>>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/...8&pageNumber=1
>>>
>>>
>>> Fascinating article
>>>
>>> "Here are just some of the conduits through which advertising will
>>> enter into your cell phone:
>>
>>
>> The sky is not falling!!
>> My cell phone is listed on the National "do not call list" & you
>> should do the same thing. The "do not call list" is now permement with
>> no experation date.
>
>
> R-i-g-h-t. That works SO WELL... NOT.

Works for me. I have our cell numbers and also home VoIP numbers on the
do not call list and also the businesses we have a relationship with
have also been asked not to call unless it is business related per the
do not call regulation and I can't remember the last unsolicited call.

"Tom J" <tomnews@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:v4idnZ6XV4nFHMvVnZ2dnUVZ_qninZ2d@earthlink.co m...
> 4phun wrote:
>> Here comes the cell phone ad disaster
>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/...8&pageNumber=1
>>
>> Fascinating article
>>
>> "Here are just some of the conduits through which advertising will
>> enter into your cell phone:
>
> The sky is not falling!!
> My cell phone is listed on the National "do not call list" & you should do
> the same thing. The "do not call list" is now permement with no experation
> date.
>
> Tom J
BFD.. There is no enforcement on that list. They know it and there is
nothing anyone can do. SBC Told me they can't do anything but change my
number.

The list is bogus.

["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.verizon.]
On 2008-06-16, Kevin Weaver <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> BFD.. There is no enforcement on that list. They know it and there is
> nothing anyone can do. SBC Told me they can't do anything but change my
> number.
>
> The list is bogus.

SBC/AT&T? They're a bunch of lazy, incompetent assholes who only exist to
screw everyone they do business with.

The DNC list works for my family too. You might try it.


--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:54:04 -0500, "BruceR" <bruceNO@SPAMwhoever.com>
wrote:

>
>"Tom J" <tomnews@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>newso6dnU3GCpt3WMvVnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@earthlink.c om...
>
>>
>> You thought it was neat, but I wouldn't. They would hear from me & not
>> as a customer either!
>>
>> Tom J
>That's exactly right. As soon as the first person angrily storms into a
>store demanding payment for minutes or text units that the store used
>the practice will stop dead in it's tracks. And the smart carrier who
>promises to never allow the practice will see thousands of subscribers
>flocking to it until all the carriers get the point. The smart carriers
>will only allow it to happen on an opt-in basis or compensated basis
>where one would get discounted - or possibly even free - service for
>allowing the ads. I could see a construct where a pre-paid phone
>customer could earn more minutes by allowing him/herself to be bombarded
>by ads and getting a half a minute free for every ad they opened.
>

Virgin Mobile already has it. minute for minute credit for watching
ads on thier site, and (IIRC) and a minute of airtime for each two
(free) text ads you reply to for more info. You can also get bonus
minutes for doing surveys on-site as well.

D <noemail@respondhere.com> wrote in
news:506e54lg658iqlpmrcdludi60ftcqnmipj@4ax.com:

> Virgin Mobile already has it. minute for minute credit for watching
> ads on thier site, and (IIRC) and a minute of airtime for each two
> (free) text ads you reply to for more info. You can also get bonus
> minutes for doing surveys on-site as well.
>
>
>
>

Hmm...with a little app to automate the process, this might be a free
sellphone!

At 16 Jun 2008 18:44:33 -0400 George wrote:

> > Actually all my phones have been registered with DO NOT CALL. I still
> > received a text message in a shopping center a month ago from some
> > local robot that sensed my nearby cellphone. I thought it was neat and
> > at the same time I was annoyed that they could do that.
>
> Thinking it was "neat" wouldn't be my first thought...

Funny, MY first thought was "impossible." How is the "local robot" going
to sniff out your phone number to text you by "sensing your phone"? Like
many of 4phun's posts, this smells fishy.

As reported in the trades, advertisers have been testing "robots" that
attempt to connect with Bluetooth-enabled phones left in discoverable mode
with offers of free ringtones or wallpapers to promote movies, etc., but
the recipient has to permit the contact and pair with the sender, and
AFAIK, the tests have been less than impressive for the sponsors (few
people understand how to use their phone's BT other than using their
headset.)

I fail to see how any "robot" could intercept a device's phone number to
text it unsolicited. I think 4phun is having "phun" with us and passing
off apocryphal urban legend as a first hand account. Next he'll tell us
you can pop corn with four iPhones... ;-)

4phun <vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote in news:e322c005-f366-41c2-802c-
6e2ce60f76b7@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

> Brace yourself for ads on your cellphone.

The really sad part is millions of dumbasses are BUYING from this spam,
just like the web spam, dooming them, and us, to yet more billboards in our
homes, in our cars, in our pockets....

Too bad, too, because a clear message COULD be sent back up the lines that
this was unacceptable behaviour....just like MPAA and RIAA....simply stop
buying.

Maybe as we pass $10/gallon that might happen!

I did, I do. That's why I called them. On list still get calls.

"Steve Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net> wrote in message
news:slrng5dv3g.77m.sjsobol@amethyst.justthe.net.. .
> ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.verizon.]
> On 2008-06-16, Kevin Weaver <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> BFD.. There is no enforcement on that list. They know it and there is
>> nothing anyone can do. SBC Told me they can't do anything but change my
>> number.
>>
>> The list is bogus.
>
> SBC/AT&T? They're a bunch of lazy, incompetent assholes who only exist to
> screw everyone they do business with.
>
> The DNC list works for my family too. You might try it.
>
>
> --
> Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED www.SteveSobol.com
> Geek-for-hire. Details: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol
>

At 17 Jun 2008 04:11:44 -0700 Kevin Weaver wrote:
> I did, I do. That's why I called them. On list still get calls.

Sure, some jokers will try to circumvent the list- I've been getting calls
from clowns trying to sell me car warranties lately. They're calling from
throwaway VoIP numbers and hang up if I ask the name of their company.

But the DNC list blocks the vast majority of nuisance calls, at least until
election season heats up again! ;-)

Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote:

> But the DNC list blocks the vast majority of nuisance calls, at
> least until election season heats up again! ;-)

Unfortunately, the DNC doesn't cover election calls.





--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org

On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:04:26 -0600, Todd Allcock
<elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote:

>At 17 Jun 2008 04:11:44 -0700 Kevin Weaver wrote:
>> I did, I do. That's why I called them. On list still get calls.
>
>Sure, some jokers will try to circumvent the list- I've been getting calls
>from clowns trying to sell me car warranties lately. They're calling from
>throwaway VoIP numbers and hang up if I ask the name of their company.
>
>But the DNC list blocks the vast majority of nuisance calls, at least until
>election season heats up again! ;-)
>
Of course the politicians don't consider their calls to be nuisance
calls so they aren't covered by the law. <GRIN>