[POSTED TO alt.cellular.attws - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
In <RldId.3144$cZ1.154@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> on Fri, 21 Jan 2005
20:11:29 GMT, "Jeremy" <jeremy@nospam.com> wrote:
>"Jack Zwick" <jzwick3@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:jzwick3-
>>
>> Just the name reverts back. April 23.
>
>I don't follow you--the name, but not the logo, reverts back?
Only the name was licensed, not the logo.
>I did read a press release that AT&T issued, saying emphatically that they
>would be back in the wireless business "the day after" they got their name
>back. ...
Really? Citation?
>... Who knows, AT&T may be setting their
>sights on a new generation of phones. Satellite, like OnStar, maybe??? Who
>knows?
Anyone paying attention -- AT&T has no spectrum, or satellites either.
--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR
GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>