Cell Phone Forums
This is a discussion on Cellular Interference in the alt.cellular forum at Cell Phone Forums
Forums Blogs Apps Phones Search Register  
Cell Phone Forums RSS Feed Connect CPF with Facebook Follow CPF on Twitter! FAQ Arcade Groups Tags
Cell Phone Forums > Cell Phone Manufacturers > General Cell Phone Forum > alt.cellular > Cellular Interference



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 03-16-2005, 01:42 PM #1
ChaosThyre81
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Cellular Interference



Klein Wrote: (My Question is on the bottom)

The above kinds of things were never reported with analog cell phones
because these phones use an FM waveform which is at a constant
strength, i.e., no pulsations. When the first GSM and TDMA phones
came into the consumer marketplace, such things began to be reported.
This happens because the fundamental waveform of these standards is a
pulsating waveform that has either a 1/8 or 1/3 duty cycle, depending
on which standard it is (also iDEN does this.) In the case of the US
TDMA (IS-136) standard, the pulsations occur at a 67 Hz rate. The
digital speech signals are gathered up over a 20 msec time interval
and then transmitted in two bursts of 3.33 msec. The rest of the time
(13.3 msec) other cell phones will transmit. Because the transmitter
is only on 1/3 of the time, it must transmit at 3 times the power
level that would be needed if continuous non-TDMA waveforms were being
used. In the case of GSM, the duty cycle is 1/8 and the burst rate is
a little over 200 Hz. Of course, the GSM signal has a peak power 8
times higher than the average power.


Hello, I'm curious about something:

"The rest of the time
(13.3 msec) other cell phones will transmit. Because the transmitter
is only on 1/3 of the time, it must transmit at 3 times the power
level that would be needed if continuous non-TDMA waveforms were being
used. In the case of GSM, the duty cycle is 1/8 and the burst rate is
a little over 200 Hz. Of course, the GSM signal has a peak power 8
times higher than the average power."

Why does the transmitter have to transmit at 3 times the power because
it's only on a 3rd of the time?

Thanks!

M.


--
ChaosThyre81


Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Cell Phone Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-18-2005, 03:11 PM #2
Klein
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: Cellular Interference


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:42:03 +0000, ChaosThyre81
<ChaosThyre81.1m0leq@news.cellbanter.com> wrote:

>
>Klein Wrote: (My Question is on the bottom)
>
>The above kinds of things were never reported with analog cell phones
>because these phones use an FM waveform which is at a constant
>strength, i.e., no pulsations. When the first GSM and TDMA phones
>came into the consumer marketplace, such things began to be reported.
>This happens because the fundamental waveform of these standards is a
>pulsating waveform that has either a 1/8 or 1/3 duty cycle, depending
>on which standard it is (also iDEN does this.) In the case of the US
>TDMA (IS-136) standard, the pulsations occur at a 67 Hz rate. The
>digital speech signals are gathered up over a 20 msec time interval
>and then transmitted in two bursts of 3.33 msec. The rest of the time
>(13.3 msec) other cell phones will transmit. Because the transmitter
>is only on 1/3 of the time, it must transmit at 3 times the power
>level that would be needed if continuous non-TDMA waveforms were being
>used. In the case of GSM, the duty cycle is 1/8 and the burst rate is
>a little over 200 Hz. Of course, the GSM signal has a peak power 8
>times higher than the average power.
>
>
>Hello, I'm curious about something:
>
>"The rest of the time
>(13.3 msec) other cell phones will transmit. Because the transmitter
>is only on 1/3 of the time, it must transmit at 3 times the power
>level that would be needed if continuous non-TDMA waveforms were being
>used. In the case of GSM, the duty cycle is 1/8 and the burst rate is
>a little over 200 Hz. Of course, the GSM signal has a peak power 8
>times higher than the average power."
>
>Why does the transmitter have to transmit at 3 times the power because
>it's only on a 3rd of the time?


Transmission of 1 bit of information over a certain distance requires
a certain transmission energy. Energy is the product of power and
time. If you wish to transmit one bit in t seconds, then a certain
amount of power will be required. If you wish to transmit one bit in
t/2 seconds, then twice the power will be required in order for the
energy to remain the same. Another way to look at is that the average
power required for a given data rate is independent of the time taken
to do the transmission. If you decrease the transmission interval,
the peak power must increase proportionally in order to keep the
average power the same.

"There ain't no free lunch."
Klein
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:





All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Add to MyYahoo Add to NewsGator Add to MyAOL Add to Bloglines Add to NewVibes Add to Technorati Favorites Add to Google

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
©2004 - 2009 Sugarman Studios, LLC. All Rights Reserverd.