Cell Phone Forums
This is a discussion on flip phones verses no moving parts in the alt.cellular forum at Cell Phone Forums
Forums Blogs Apps Phones Search Register  
Cell Phone Forums RSS Feed Connect CPF with Facebook Follow CPF on Twitter! FAQ Arcade Groups Tags
Cell Phone Forums > Cell Phone Manufacturers > General Cell Phone Forum > alt.cellular > flip phones verses no moving parts



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-04-2005, 06:07 PM #1
Perry Webb
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

flip phones verses no moving parts


Are flip phones worth the extra cost? Do they make a different with screen
damage? Does it make a difference covering the buttons so they can't be
pushed? Do flip phones wear out quicker because of opening and closing them
often?




Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Cell Phone Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-04-2005, 06:14 PM #2
Notan
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts


Perry Webb wrote:
>
> Are flip phones worth the extra cost? Do they make a different with screen
> damage? Does it make a difference covering the buttons so they can't be
> pushed? Do flip phones wear out quicker because of opening and closing them
> often?


Personal preference, personal preference, personal preference.

Notan
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Old 07-04-2005, 06:21 PM #3
Perry Webb
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts


I have experience with PDA's but not with cell phones. What happens if you
put a cell phone that doesn't fold up in your front pocket so that the
screen and buttons are exposed? Does a cell phone turn on accidentally very
easily? Is there more to a flip phone than being a little smaller?



"Notan" <notan@ddress.com> wrote in message
news:42C9C2E6.696CEA72@ddress.com...
> Perry Webb wrote:
>>
>> Are flip phones worth the extra cost? Do they make a different with
>> screen
>> damage? Does it make a difference covering the buttons so they can't be
>> pushed? Do flip phones wear out quicker because of opening and closing
>> them
>> often?

>
> Personal preference, personal preference, personal preference.
>
> Notan



Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Old 07-04-2005, 06:30 PM #4
Notan
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts


Perry Webb wrote:
>
> I have experience with PDA's but not with cell phones. What happens if you
> put a cell phone that doesn't fold up in your front pocket so that the
> screen and buttons are exposed? Does a cell phone turn on accidentally very
> easily? Is there more to a flip phone than being a little smaller?


I was serious about "personal preference."

Most "candybar" phones, i.e., non-flip, have some type of "button protect"
feature, which keeps an accidental button press from doing anything. Most
also have internal antennas, as opposed to flip-phones, which have external.

Other than that, it's mostly about how the phone feels *in your hand.*

Notan
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Old 07-04-2005, 06:32 PM #5
Notan
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts


Notan wrote:
>
> Perry Webb wrote:
> >
> > I have experience with PDA's but not with cell phones. What happens if you
> > put a cell phone that doesn't fold up in your front pocket so that the
> > screen and buttons are exposed? Does a cell phone turn on accidentally very
> > easily? Is there more to a flip phone than being a little smaller?

>
> I was serious about "personal preference."
>
> Most "candybar" phones, i.e., non-flip, have some type of "button protect"
> feature, which keeps an accidental button press from doing anything. Most
> also have internal antennas, as opposed to flip-phones, which have external.
>
> Other than that, it's mostly about how the phone feels *in your hand.*


Oh yeah, there's also the fact that a flip-phone will protect the screen
better than a non-flip without some type of screen protector.

Notan
Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Old 07-07-2005, 08:28 PM #6
dterrors@hotmail.com
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts


Flip phones aren't smaller. The reason Nokia didn't make flip phones
when every other company did is because they thought people would care
more about small than flip.

Think about it like an engineer: to make a phone flip open, you are
essentially cutting a line down the middle of a cell phone. Internal
components have to pick one side or the other. That constraint usually
makes the phone bigger. The reason they flip isn't for the sake of
your ear and mouth, they flip because users think flipping is smaller
and cooler even though it's not.

Well, and to protect the screen better, I admit.

Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Old 07-07-2005, 09:32 PM #7
B. Peg
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts


> <dterrors@hotmail.com> wrote: <snip>
> The reason Nokia didn't make flip phones
> when every other company did is because they thought people would care
> more about small than flip.


????

Mine is a Nokia flip.


> Think about it like an engineer: to make a phone flip open, you are
> essentially cutting a line down the middle of a cell phone. Internal
> components have to pick one side or the other. That constraint usually
> makes the phone bigger. The reason they flip isn't for the sake of
> your ear and mouth, they flip because users think flipping is smaller
> and cooler even though it's not.
>
> Well, and to protect the screen better, I admit.


To protect the thing from whatever. Voice also seems - to the receiver -
amplified on the flipper as well. Too bad I loaned it to someone who
flipped it open (HARD!) and busted the hinge. A traveling Nokia repairman
who goes from dealer-to-dealer fixed it with a new case and added a new
window for $32.

Okay, I sat on it a few times and tweaked the LCD display so it does weird
things at times until I twist it this way and that.

Look at the Motorola Razor if want a thin flipper.

B~


Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
Old 07-08-2005, 05:11 PM #8
dterrors@hotmail.com
Guest
CPF $: 0 Donate

Re: flip phones verses no moving parts




B. Peg wrote:
> > <dterrors@hotmail.com> wrote: <snip>
> > The reason Nokia didn't make flip phones
> > when every other company did is because they thought people would care
> > more about small than flip.

>
> ????
>
> Mine is a Nokia flip.
>
>


Why the question marks? I didn't say nokia doesn't make flip phones
now.

Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Twit this!

Did you find this post helpful? Yes No
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads for: flip phones verses no moving parts
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tessera's OptiML Zoom gets cameraphones 3x closer without moving parts EngadgetMobile Cell Phones News Archive 0 04-28-2008 04:10 PM
Buying Used Cell Phones & Parts... jbarney_guy For Sale/Wanted 5 03-03-2007 07:04 AM
New PVPro mini projector has no moving parts cellphonenews Cell Phones News Archive 0 03-05-2006 11:06 PM
New PVPro mini projector has no moving parts cellphonenews Cell Phones News Archive 0 02-13-2006 08:06 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Add to MyYahoo Add to NewsGator Add to MyAOL Add to Bloglines Add to NewVibes Add to Technorati Favorites Add to Google

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
©2004 - 2009 Sugarman Studios, LLC. All Rights Reserverd.