Are we moving towards homogenous service across providers?

(PeteCresswell) wrote:
> From the outside, it seems logical that providers should continue to cut deals
> with each other so their customers can use the other's network - if only because
> it seems cheaper to cut such a deal than to install duplicate infrastructure.
>
> Comments?

There are still a bunch of providers with incompatible technology on their
networks.

--
Steve Sobol, Professional Geek 888-480-4638 PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Company website: http://JustThe.net/
Personal blog, resume, portfolio: http://SteveSobol.com/
E: [email protected] Snail: 22674 Motnocab Road, Apple Valley, CA 92307

---

› See More: Are we moving towards homogenous service across providers?

From the outside, it seems logical that providers should continue to cut deals
with each other so their customers can use the other's network - if only because
it seems cheaper to cut such a deal than to install duplicate infrastructure.

Comments?
--
PeteCresswell

(PeteCresswell) wrote:

> From the outside, it seems logical that providers should continue to cut
> deals with each other so their customers can use the other's network - if
> only because it seems cheaper to cut such a deal than to install duplicate
> infrastructure.

Assuming compatible technology, that leaves an interesting situation.
First, each carrier would be limited to customers in areas where they have
licensed equipment. Second, they would be put in pretty much monopolistic
operation in their areas -- legal? Third, their customers would only avoid
roaming charges in those areas where another carrier decided to cut a
roaming agreement -- some might not. Fourth, your carrier would have no
control over the quality (or lack of it) of signal supplied in other areas.

And, as already mentioned, there are a number of different cell technologies
in use. Any roaming agreements would only be beneficial for carriers with
the same technology in place.

Bill K