Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Proposal alt.cellular.t-mobile

    In alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream Scott Ehrlich <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    > Why start a t-mobile newsgroup after all these years after VS has changed
    > to T-mobile? It would be interesting to see which one eventually wins -
    > between the existing VS or new TM group.
    >


    The TM group was fought from its inception and people just gave up. That had
    a largely negative impact on t-mobile discussion on USENET in my opinion.

    --
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1




    See More: Proposal alt.cellular.t-mobile




  2. #32
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Proposal alt.cellular.t-mobile

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on 10 Apr 2006 13:43:33
    GMT, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In alt.cellular.gsm.carriers.voicestream Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> John Navas wrote:
    >>
    >>> Good point. Perhaps a better new name would be alt.cellular.t-mobile.usa

    >>
    >> That's one way to go. It's just as easy to only do alt.cellular.t-mobile.
    >>
    >>> Of course not -- Cingular was a separate operation when I created
    >>> alt.cellular.cingular

    >>
    >> well, that's true, its predecessors didn't have their own newsgroups, eh.

    >
    >The control message I sent is to create alt.cellular.t-mobile.


    If you want to succeed, you'll probably need to do a lot more than that, like
    persuading major news services to carry it. That's what I did with
    alt.cellular.cingular

    BTW, it's rude to keep posting more limited follow-ups than the newsgroups
    you're posting to. If you don't want the other newsgroups to be involved,
    then don't post to them. [cross-posting restored, again]

    --
    Best regards, SEE THE FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS AT
    John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>



  3. #33
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Proposal alt.cellular.t-mobile

    Sven Golly wrote:
    > Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in
    > news:[email protected]:
    >
    >> a) That means nothing to an ISP or news outsourcer - they don't care
    >> how many crossposts there are into a newsgroup. The ONLY thing that's
    >> going to carry any weight is if that company's customers ask them to
    >> carry the group.

    >
    > Not quite right. I once asked the guy who was the head admin for
    > StooperNews (can't remember his name -- something French I think)


    Andrew? Danhiel? Ade?

    --
    Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
    Apple Valley, CA
    Resident of Southern California -
    the home of beautiful people and butt-ugly traffic jams



  4. #34
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Proposal alt.cellular.t-mobile

    Sven Golly wrote:
    > Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote in
    > news:[email protected]:
    >
    >> I'd personally like to see posts from non-US T-Mo users, which is
    >> never, ever going to happen while the group is named "voicestream",
    >> since I guarantee no one overseas knows or cares what VoiceStream was.

    >
    > IAWTP.


    Huh? EXPN? (That's an acronym I've never seen before.)

    --
    Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
    Apple Valley, CA
    Resident of Southern California -
    the home of beautiful people and butt-ugly traffic jams



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123