Anybody tried the CECT P168? It is a clone of the iPhone.

Hi folks,

Anybody here used the CECT P168?
I've only met one person who has it but she says it works fine.

Thanks.

---

› See More: Anybody tried the CECT P168? It is a clone of the iPhone.

[email protected] wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Anybody here used the CECT P168?
> I've only met one person who has it but she says it works fine.
>
> Thanks.

It's not good for the U.S. as it lacks the most popular GSM band in the
U.S., 850 MHz. If you only have 1900 MHz for the U.S. then your coverage
will be very, very poor.

Tri-band phones were popular about six years ago when all the GSM in the
U.S. was 1900 MHz, and the 850 MHz (also called 800 MHz) was for TDMA
and analog. No one in the U.S., or traveling to the U.S., would want the
CECT P168.

Mike S. wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> SMS <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Anybody here used the CECT P168?
>>> I've only met one person who has it but she says it works fine.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>> It's not good for the U.S. as it lacks the most popular GSM band in the
>> U.S., 850 MHz. If you only have 1900 MHz for the U.S. then your coverage
>> will be very, very poor.
>
> The latest shipments of the P168+ are quad-band GSM.

This isn't clear. Look at
"http://storesense2.megawebservers.com/stores/h/HS6191/cataloglist.html"

Where they now have a tri-band North American version, but still no quad
band. "http://zydaglo.com" Not much use in Europe and Asia.

Where did you see a quad band?

No voice-dialing (like the iPhone).

No Wi-Fi.

Mike S. wrote:

> As I understand it, the way to truly tell what you are getting is to look
> at the IMEI sticker inside the battery compartment. It lists the the
> frequency bands the hardware supports, and the choices are etiehr
> 850-1800-1900 or 900-1800-1900. A P168+ bearing a sticker that says
> 850-900-1800-1900 has not been spotted as far as I can see. Obviously an
> honest and cooperative dealer is essential to making such a transaction
> safe.

They're using an older chipset, where you can't have both 850 and 900.
This makes it rather worthless as a world phone. The most widely used
band in Europe and Asia is 900 MHz and in the U.S. it's 850 MHz. You'll
have terrible coverage with only 1800 MHz in Europe and Asia or only
1900 MHz in the U.S..

When GSM first because available in the U.S. there was only 1900 MHz, by
Voicestream and the western region of Cingular, and TDMA was at 800 MHz
(AKA 850 MHz) and there were a bunch of tri-band "world phones,"
including the very popular Motorola Timeport series which I bought. It's
still usable in Europe and Asia, but since it can't to texting, there
are some difficulties when the prepaid carrier sends stuff like
passwords to the account to the phone as a text message.