I just dropped in to see.......

..........if Rod speed was still alive.

---

› See More: I just dropped in to see.......

He's about, but the pills are working it seems.

"Andy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>

"Andy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>

you wont be disappointed :-)

"Andy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>

Unfortunately yes.. Although at his age, its more 'Rod Slow' that the old
Rod Speed..

You do know they call him 'speedy' in an ironic sense..

Grow up loser.
He's got more brains than you.


"James Bell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Andy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>>
>
> Unfortunately yes.. Although at his age, its more 'Rod Slow' that the old
> Rod Speed..
>
> You do know they call him 'speedy' in an ironic sense..
>
>

"Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Grow up loser.
> He's got more brains than you.


If you had a brain, you would know that it is "He HAS more brains than you."

Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
plurals of brains, either.

Shows how much you don't know.

The noun 'brain', when used in the "INTELLIGENCE" context is "often used in
plural <eg. plenty of brains in that family>"
source: www.m-w.com



"James Bell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Grow up loser.
>> He's got more brains than you.
>
>
> If you had a brain, you would know that it is "He HAS more brains than
> you."
>
> Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
> plurals of brains, either.
>

Shows how much you don't know.

The noun 'brain', when used in the "INTELLIGENCE" context is "often used in
plural <eg. plenty of brains in that family>"
source: www.m-w.com



"James Bell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Grow up loser.
>> He's got more brains than you.
>
>
> If you had a brain, you would know that it is "He HAS more brains than
> you."
>
> Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
> plurals of brains, either.
>

James Bell wrote:

> Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
> plurals of brains, either.

Yes there is. For example, you get Rod Speed's brain and Michael's
brain. That makes two.. er, hang on. You're right in this instance.

Sorry, that was a bad example. Between them that only makes up half a
brain....