New 3G 850MHz

David Rankin wrote:
> Just testing Agent Email.
> Check these out.......
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html

Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of
a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.

> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html

More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone from
the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy a
similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional centres.

---

› See More: New 3G 850MHz

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:15:37 +1000, Kubalister
<[email protected]> wrote:

>David Rankin wrote:
>> Just testing Agent Email.
>> Check these out.......
>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>
>Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of
>a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
>beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>
>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html
>
>More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone from
>the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy a
>similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
>deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional centres.

That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde a well
known and respected communications analyst, http://www.budde.com.au/
who has been doing this a very long time.

There are elements of truth in that article. Telstra does not "listen"
to anyone.

[email protected] wrote
> Kubalister <[email protected]> wrote
>> David Rankin wrote

>>> Check these out.......
>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html

>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of
>> a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area
>> far beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.

>>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html

>> More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone
>> from the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy
>> a similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
>> deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional centres.

> That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde

Yes.

> a well known

Yes.

> and respected communications analyst,

Wrong. Only by pig ignorant fools.

> http://www.budde.com.au/ who has been doing this a very long time.

And who has ALWAYS got the basics completely wrong over that very long time.

> There are elements of truth in that article.

Nope.

> Telstra does not "listen" to anyone.

Neither does any other telco.

[email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:15:37 +1000, Kubalister
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> David Rankin wrote:
>>> Just testing Agent Email.
>>> Check these out.......
>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of
>> a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
>> beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>>
>>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html
>> More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone from
>> the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy a
>> similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
>> deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional centres.
>
> That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde a well
> known and respected communications analyst, http://www.budde.com.au/
> who has been doing this a very long time.

You really should do some research. Paul Budde has only one degree - a
marketing degree from the Netherlands Institute for Marketing!
You should really understand what an 'analyst' means. Anyone that uses a
phone can be self described as a communications analyst.

He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All
he does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any
news organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his
long standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being
rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago.

"Kubalister" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:15:37 +1000, Kubalister
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> David Rankin wrote:
>>>> Just testing Agent Email.
>>>> Check these out.......
>>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of
>>> a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
>>> beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>>>
>>>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html
>>> More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone from
>>> the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy a
>>> similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
>>> deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional
>>> centres.
>>
>> That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde a well
>> known and respected communications analyst, http://www.budde.com.au/
>> who has been doing this a very long time.
>
> You really should do some research. Paul Budde has only one degree - a
> marketing degree from the Netherlands Institute for Marketing!
> You should really understand what an 'analyst' means. Anyone that uses a
> phone can be self described as a communications analyst.
>
> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All he
> does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any news
> organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his long
> standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being rejected for
> a broadband upgrade some time ago.

You said "result of being rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago",
now I wonder how you know that?. Sounds like inside information...

Kubalister <[email protected]> wrote
> [email protected] wrote
>> Kubalister <[email protected]> wrote
>>> David Rankin wrote

>>>> Check these out.......
>>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the
>>> significance of a wireless broadband network with absolutely
>>> massive coverage area far beyond what any other telco had planned
>>> in their wildest dreams.

>>>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html
>>> More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone
>>> from the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to
>>> deploy a similar national network and will subsequently be limited
>>> to only deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few
>>> regional centres.

>> That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde a well
>> known and respected communications analyst, http://www.budde.com.au/
>> who has been doing this a very long time.

> You really should do some research. Paul Budde has only one degree - a marketing degree from the
> Netherlands Institute for Marketing!

> You should really understand what an 'analyst' means. Anyone that
> uses a phone can be self described as a communications analyst.

> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period.

And is a terminal ****wit to boot.

> All he does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any news organisation stupid
> enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his long standing position for Telstra bashing is the
> result of being rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago.

Unlikely, that fool has been telstra bashing since well before
there was even any broadband available in this country.

"Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kubalister" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:15:37 +1000, Kubalister
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> David Rankin wrote:
>>>>> Just testing Agent Email.
>>>>> Check these out.......
>>>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>>>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance
>>>> of a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area
>>>> far beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html
>>>> More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone
>>>> from the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy
>>>> a similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
>>>> deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional
>>>> centres.
>>>
>>> That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde a well
>>> known and respected communications analyst, http://www.budde.com.au/
>>> who has been doing this a very long time.
>>
>> You really should do some research. Paul Budde has only one degree - a
>> marketing degree from the Netherlands Institute for Marketing!
>> You should really understand what an 'analyst' means. Anyone that uses a
>> phone can be self described as a communications analyst.
>>
>> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All
>> he does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any
>> news organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his
>> long standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being
>> rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago.
>
> You said "result of being rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago",
> now I wonder how you know that?. Sounds like inside information...
>

I thought you wouldn't reply 'Kubalister' ... looks like I was right.

"Kubalister" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> David Rankin wrote:
>> Just testing Agent Email.
>> Check these out.......
>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>
> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of a
> wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
> beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.

Yeah, Budde's always been an irrelevant ****wit

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:15:37 +1000, Kubalister
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>David Rankin wrote:
>>> Just testing Agent Email.
>>> Check these out.......
>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>>
>>Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of
>>a wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
>>beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>>
>>> http://www.crikey.com.au/Business/20...w-network.html
>>
>>More desperate Optus FUD as a pathetic attempt to distract everyone from
>>the fact that Optus doesn't have any equivalent spectrum to deploy a
>>similar national network and will subsequently be limited to only
>>deploying 3GSM services in the capital cities and a few regional centres.
>
> That "clueless Journo" you are talking about is Paul Budde a well
> known and respected communications analyst, http://www.budde.com.au/
> who has been doing this a very long time.

No, he is a complete and utter ****wit, pie-in-the-sky, theoretical, no idea
about the real world.

> You really should do some research. Paul Budde has only one degree - a
> marketing degree from the Netherlands Institute for Marketing!
> You should really understand what an 'analyst' means. Anyone that uses a
> phone can be self described as a communications analyst.
>
> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All he
> does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any news
> organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his long
> standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being rejected for
> a broadband upgrade some time ago.

No, I think he got charged $65 connection fee on his AMPS to GSM upgrade and
it all started then . . .

"Intel Inside" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All
>> he does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any
>> news organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his
>> long standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being
>> rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago.
>
> You said "result of being rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago",
> now I wonder how you know that?. Sounds like inside information...

Sounded like a joke, Joyce.
>
>

>>> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All
>>> he does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any
>>> news organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his
>>> long standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being
>>> rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago.
>>
>> You said "result of being rejected for a broadband upgrade some time
>> ago", now I wonder how you know that?. Sounds like inside information...
>>
>
> I thought you wouldn't reply 'Kubalister' ... looks like I was right.

hahahah ****wit
>
>

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:33:59 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Kubalister" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> David Rankin wrote:
>>> Just testing Agent Email.
>>> Check these out.......
>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>>
>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of a
>> wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
>> beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>
>Yeah, Budde's always been an irrelevant ****wit
>


You get that!

----------------------------------------------------------------

If this was a perfect world, we, probably, wouldn't
be in it.

On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:33:59 GMT, "Michael" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Kubalister" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> David Rankin wrote:
>>> Just testing Agent Email.
>>> Check these out.......
>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sto...00-664,00.html
>>
>> Just another clueless journo that doesn't understand the significance of a
>> wireless broadband network with absolutely massive coverage area far
>> beyond what any other telco had planned in their wildest dreams.
>
>Yeah, Budde's always been an irrelevant ****wit

Must be the weekend. Mikey's been allowed out on w/e release.

"Michael" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:dz%[email protected]...
>
>>>> He does NOT have any technical skills in telecommunications period. All
>>>> he does is run around like a mad cow offering personal agendas to any
>>>> news organisation stupid enough to pay him. I can only suggest that his
>>>> long standing position for Telstra bashing is the result of being
>>>> rejected for a broadband upgrade some time ago.
>>>
>>> You said "result of being rejected for a broadband upgrade some time
>>> ago", now I wonder how you know that?. Sounds like inside
>>> information...
>>>
>>
>> I thought you wouldn't reply 'Kubalister' ... looks like I was right.
>
> hahahah ****wit
>>
>>
>


Your profanities will not throw people off of the scent.