ABC TV "4 CORNERS" program about Telstra Australia dictatorship to staffs & customers?

OECD babble. Reigned by lunatics such as Bush and Howard.

"Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Anthony Horan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:07:35 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>> Anthony Horan <[email protected]> wrote
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>
>>>>> And with a 4.x% unemployment rate, there are plenty
>>>>> of other jobs available for anyone who wants one.
>>>
>>>> Maybe it's time you stopped quoting that bogus unemployment rate
>>>
>>> Tell the OECD, they quote the same rate, ****wit child.
>>
>> Yawn. Guess who supplies the rate to the OECD
>
> The OECD has their OWN standardised data, you stupid pig ignorant ****wit
> clown.
>
>> It is a bogus figure, carefully manufactured for political gain.
>
> Pity about the standardised OECD rate, which is within 0.1%
> of the govt rate, you stupid pig ignorant ****wit clown.
>
>> That has been well documented. Read something.
>
> Cant even order you to read the OECD standardised rate
> description, you've obviously wanked yourself completely blind.
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

---

› See More: ABC TV "4 CORNERS" program about Telstra Australia dictatorship to staffs & customers?

Not a ****ing clue, as always. Pity the OECD standardised
unemployment rate does NOT involve just 1 hour of work a
week to be classified as employed, you pig ignorant ****wit clown.

thegoons <[email protected]> wrote:
> OECD babble. Reigned by lunatics such as Bush and Howard.
>
> "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Anthony Horan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:07:35 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anthony Horan <[email protected]> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>
>>>>>> And with a 4.x% unemployment rate, there are plenty
>>>>>> of other jobs available for anyone who wants one.
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it's time you stopped quoting that bogus unemployment rate
>>>>
>>>> Tell the OECD, they quote the same rate, ****wit child.
>>>
>>> Yawn. Guess who supplies the rate to the OECD
>>
>> The OECD has their OWN standardised data, you stupid pig ignorant
>> ****wit clown.
>>
>>> It is a bogus figure, carefully manufactured for political gain.
>>
>> Pity about the standardised OECD rate, which is within 0.1%
>> of the govt rate, you stupid pig ignorant ****wit clown.
>>
>>> That has been well documented. Read something.
>>
>> Cant even order you to read the OECD standardised rate
>> description, you've obviously wanked yourself completely blind.

>>>>> And the actual number is irrelevant anyway, the modern
>>>>> reality is that an official unemployment rate of less than 5%
>>>>> means that anyone who actually wants a job can get one.
>>>
>>>> Firstly, that depends on how you define "job".
>>>
>>> Nope, there is only one viable definition, paid work.
>>
>> True, but with the govs definition, employed means an hour a week or
>> more. A worker with 5 hours work cannot earn enough to pay rent, let
>> alone buy food.
>> .
>>>> Secondly, saying to an unemployed software engineer "but you
>>>> could get work cleaning **** off toilets for the rest of your life"
>>>> might be the Howard way, but it's completely irrelevant to reality.
>>>
>>> There's plenty of work for unemployed software engineers, ****wit.
>>
>> No there isn't. If they had work, they wouldnt be "unemployed software
>> engineers" )
>
> You seem to think that an "unemployed software engineer" needs to find
> work as a software engineer.

Comprehension seems to be a lacking skill for a few ppl on this group.

> If I was sacked tomorrow, I'd be stacking shelves at Coles the next day,
> until I found the right job.
>
> Thats the problem with a lot of people nowadays, think they are too good
> to start at the bottom. Wankers.

Yes and no. If you had to start at the bottom again, well it has to be. But
do you think that ppl who have been on the upper part of the ladder for
years want to start at the bottom again. If they could get a job in the
same, or similar field, they have the opportunity to crawl back again. If
they cant get a job in their field and have to start in a totally different
field depending on their age, they may never climb the ladder past rung one.

>> play the same game and always have. It's only the pig ignorant who cant
>> see through this scam, and believe the rot. Ask small business owners how
>> they think the economy is going. You wont get many positive replies.
> \
> Small business owners are whingers, always have been. They can go to hell

You are obviously someones employee, what a piss poor attitude. Small
business owners are usually the hardest workers and biggest worriers, not
because they want to be, but because they have to be.

>>>
>>> And there are **** all that can only get 5 hours of work
>>> a week when the unemployment rate is only 4.x% unless
>>> they are very picky about what work they will do anyway.
>>>
>>> You dont get to be classified as unemployed just because
>>> you cant find someone who has a job for a lion tamer.
>>>
>>>>>> Secondly, saying to an unemployed software engineer "but you
>>>>>> could get work cleaning **** off toilets for the rest of your life"
>>>>>> might be the Howard way, but it's completely irrelevant to reality.
>>>
>>>>> There's plenty of work for unemployed software engineers, ****wit.
>>>
>>>> Obviously statistical spin-doctoring isn't the only thing you foolishly
>>>> take literally.
>>>
>>> Never ever could bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Two Bob <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> And the actual number is irrelevant anyway, the modern
>>>>>> reality is that an official unemployment rate of less than 5%
>>>>>> means that anyone who actually wants a job can get one.
>>>>
>>>>> Firstly, that depends on how you define "job".
>>>>
>>>> Nope, there is only one viable definition, paid work.
>>>
>>> True, but with the govs definition, employed means an hour a week or
>>> more. A worker with 5 hours work cannot earn enough to pay rent, let
>>> alone buy food.
>>> .
>>>>> Secondly, saying to an unemployed software engineer "but you
>>>>> could get work cleaning **** off toilets for the rest of your
>>>>> life" might be the Howard way, but it's completely irrelevant to
>>>>> reality.
>>>>
>>>> There's plenty of work for unemployed software engineers, ****wit.
>>>
>>> No there isn't. If they had work, they wouldnt be "unemployed
>>> software engineers" )
>>
>> You seem to think that an "unemployed software engineer" needs to
>> find work as a software engineer.
>
> Comprehension seems to be a lacking skill for a few ppl on this group.
>
>> If I was sacked tomorrow, I'd be stacking shelves at Coles the next
>> day, until I found the right job.
>>
>> Thats the problem with a lot of people nowadays, think they are too
>> good to start at the bottom. Wankers.
>
> Yes and no. If you had to start at the bottom again, well it has to
> be. But do you think that ppl who have been on the upper part of the
> ladder for years want to start at the bottom again. If they could get
> a job in the same, or similar field, they have the opportunity to
> crawl back again. If they cant get a job in their field and have to
> start in a totally different field depending on their age, they may
> never climb the ladder past rung one.

It doesnt work like that with an unemployment rate of 4.x%

In spades when the unemployment rate is 1.x% like it is in some places now.

All you have to do is qualify and go there.

"Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > As I keep saying, that is total bull**** and has no relevance to the
stats
> > whatsoever. There are people wanting work with ZERO hours, who are not
> > included in the unemployment figures.
>
> Crap****

Why the change of topic to your intelligence?

MrT.

"Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> You can start at the bottom and move up.

Agreed. You won't move far if you are at the wrong end of your working life
though.

> Your problem is you are too proud to do anything other than work as a CEO

I wish! :-)

MrT.

"Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Small business owners are whingers, always have been.

Of course, since the government makes it so hard for them compared to big
business.

>They can go to hell

I'm sure they think the same about you.

MrT.

"Two Bob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >> Or the building industry, or all those other job's that
> >> need trained workers yet refuse to train them?
>
> > And they dont refuse to train them anyway.
>
> No they dont refuse to train them, they just refuse to employ them if they
> havent the qualifications or experience.

That should read qualifications AND experience.

MrT.

Mr.T <MrT@home> wrote
> Michael J <[email protected]> wrote

>> Small business owners are whingers, always have been.

> Of course, since the government makes it
> so hard for them compared to big business.

Pig ignorant lie. Most obviously with the unfair dismissal
law that makes it a lot easier for them than big business.

>> They can go to hell

> I'm sure they think the same about you.

And you in spades.

On Jun 24, 11:38 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:
> "Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
> > Small business owners are whingers, always have been.
>
> Of course, since the government makes it so hard for them compared to big
> business.
>
> >They can go to hell
>
> I'm sure they think the same about you.
>
> MrT.

How can you impersonate such a great man?

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Small business owners are whingers, always have been.
>
> Of course, since the government makes it so hard for them compared to big
> business.

Bull****, they get all kind of breaks, such as exemption from Unfair
Dismissal laws. ****ers.

"Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >> Small business owners are whingers, always have been.
> >
> > Of course, since the government makes it so hard for them compared to
big
> > business.
>
> Bull****, they get all kind of breaks, such as exemption from Unfair
> Dismissal laws. ****ers.

Yep I don't agree with that one, but it's obvious you have never tried to
run your own small business.

MrT.

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Michael J" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> >> Small business owners are whingers, always have been.
>> >
>> > Of course, since the government makes it so hard for them compared to
> big
>> > business.
>>
>> Bull****, they get all kind of breaks, such as exemption from Unfair
>> Dismissal laws. ****ers.
>
> Yep I don't agree with that one, but it's obvious you have never tried to
> run your own small business.

I've run a small business before.
Few moons ago.