Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
  1. #1
    Alan Parkington
    Guest
    From
    http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/20/2009952.htm

    Telstra says the level of complaints about its Next G phone network are not
    significant.

    The Federal Government says the new network is far from ready to replace
    CDMA.

    Communications Minister Helen Coonan says she has received hundreds of
    complaints on the Government's helpline set up for people who will need to
    move over to Next G once CDMA is switched off.

    But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are
    exaggerated.

    "The Minister and the Government has shared a trickle of complaints with us
    in the last couple of weeks," he said.

    "You have to remember that the Next G network now has well over 1 million
    customers so if there's 100 or 200 complaints, it really is very few."





    See More: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra




  2. #2
    thegoons
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra


    "Alan Parkington" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > From
    > http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/20/2009952.htm
    >
    > Telstra says the level of complaints about its Next G phone network are
    > not significant.
    >
    > The Federal Government says the new network is far from ready to replace
    > CDMA.
    >
    > Communications Minister Helen Coonan says she has received hundreds of
    > complaints on the Government's helpline set up for people who will need to
    > move over to Next G once CDMA is switched off.
    >
    > But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are
    > exaggerated.
    >
    > "The Minister and the Government has shared a trickle of complaints with
    > us in the last couple of weeks," he said.


    Pity it is the Minister and the Government who get to decide whether Telstra
    get to turn CDMA off.
    >
    > "You have to remember that the Next G network now has well over 1 million
    > customers so if there's 100 or 200 complaints, it really is very few."
    >
    >

    Pity it is the Minister and the Government who get to decide whether Telstra
    get to turn CDMA off.



    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com




  3. #3
    Phred
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    In article <[email protected]>, "thegoons" <[email protected]> wrote:
    [snip]
    >> "You have to remember that the Next G network now has well over 1 million
    >> customers so if there's 100 or 200 complaints, it really is very few."
    >>

    >Pity it is the Minister and the Government who get to decide whether Telstra
    >get to turn CDMA off.


    Ah, yes... But it looks like there may be a new government with some
    brains by 2008. Then again, perhaps not -- new, but still no brains.

    FWIW, the only comments I've heard from people who have switched from
    CDMA to this "G" thing here in the deep north are that it craps all
    over CDMA for coverage. Mind you, I haven't switched myself, but then
    I've only made two calls in 8 months on my mobile (bought for
    emergencies only, but I relented on two occasions so I have no
    desire to move until I have to.

    Cheers, Phred.

    --
    [email protected]LID




  4. #4
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    Alan Parkington <[email protected]> wrote:

    > From
    > http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/20/2009952.htm


    > Telstra says the level of complaints about its Next G phone network are not significant.


    Wota stunningly impeccible source on that.

    > The Federal Government says the new network is far from ready to replace CDMA.


    No they dont.

    > Communications Minister Helen Coonan says she has received hundreds of complaints on the
    > Government's helpline set up for people who will
    > need to move over to Next G once CDMA is switched off.


    > But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are exaggerated.


    Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

    > "The Minister and the Government has shared a trickle of complaints with us in the last couple of
    > weeks," he said.


    > "You have to remember that the Next G network now has well over 1
    > million customers so if there's 100 or 200 complaints, it really is very few."


    Irrelevant to whether the govt will allow you to turn the CDMA system off.





  5. #5
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    Phred <[email protected]> wrote
    > thegoons <[email protected]> wrote


    >>> "You have to remember that the Next G network now has well over 1
    >>> million customers so if there's 100 or 200 complaints, it really is very few."


    >> Pity it is the Minister and the Government who get
    >> to decide whether Telstra get to turn CDMA off.


    > Ah, yes... But it looks like there may be a new government with some brains by 2008.


    Bet there wont be.

    > Then again, perhaps not -- new, but still no brains.


    Bet there wont be a new one.

    > FWIW, the only comments I've heard from people who have switched
    > from CDMA to this "G" thing here in the deep north are that it craps all
    > over CDMA for coverage. Mind you, I haven't switched myself, but
    > then I've only made two calls in 8 months on my mobile (bought for
    > emergencies only, but I relented on two occasions so I have no
    > desire to move until I have to.







  6. #6
    Michael J
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    >> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are
    >> exaggerated.

    >
    > Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.


    Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with

    Complaints that resulted in plotting - pretty easy to measure to start with





  7. #7
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    Michael J <[email protected]> wrote:

    >>> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are exaggerated.


    >> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.


    > Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with


    Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.

    > Complaints that resulted in plotting - pretty easy to measure to start with


    Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.





  8. #8
    Michael J
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra


    "Rod Speed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Michael J <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>>> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are
    >>>> exaggerated.

    >
    >>> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

    >
    >> Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with

    >
    > Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.


    Explain why not.

    If complaints per SIO on CDMA in the last year were x, and complaints per
    SIO on NextG are y, measured over the same period, if y is less than x, then
    sounds like NextG is doing very well





  9. #9
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    Michael J <[email protected]> wrote
    > Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
    >> Michael J <[email protected]> wrote


    >>>>> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are exaggerated.


    >>>> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.


    >>> Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with


    >> Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.


    > Explain why not.


    Most dont bother to complain to telstra, because they know they will just get the usual fob off.

    > If complaints per SIO on CDMA in the last year were x, and complaints per SIO on NextG are y,
    > measured over the same period, if y is less than x, then sounds like NextG is doing very well


    Only if you dont have a clue about what people do when the service is a dud.





  10. #10

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:55:34 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Michael J <[email protected]> wrote
    >> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
    >>> Michael J <[email protected]> wrote

    >
    >>>>>> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are exaggerated.

    >
    >>>>> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.

    >
    >>>> Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with

    >
    >>> Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.

    >
    >> Explain why not.

    >
    >Most dont bother to complain to telstra, because they know they will just get the usual fob off.
    >
    >> If complaints per SIO on CDMA in the last year were x, and complaints per SIO on NextG are y,
    >> measured over the same period, if y is less than x, then sounds like NextG is doing very well

    >
    >Only if you dont have a clue about what people do when the service is a dud.
    >


    Have to agree, that most people "on the land" don't complain via the
    "official" means - they complain to their mates & families, about not
    only losing CDMA (but the rural cops get to keep it) to a service that
    doesn't perform anywhere near as well, but about the fact that it's
    widely perceived that this system is coming in, and there's nothing
    they can do about it. Michael, do you know anyone outside a capital
    city to ask what they think of Telstra? And do you know what will
    happen to this country if everyone outside a capital city decides to
    give it all up & head to the city? And I don't just mean the kiddies
    who've watched BB or Idol & seen something better... Someone better
    get their act together, as while the govt still toadies to Telstra,
    the country is fubar... Next G is only great for those who previously
    were not on CDMA...



  11. #11
    thegoons
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra


    <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:55:34 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    > <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>Michael J <[email protected]> wrote
    >>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
    >>>> Michael J <[email protected]> wrote

    >>
    >>>>>>> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns about the new system are
    >>>>>>> exaggerated.

    >>
    >>>>>> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that
    >>>>>> claim.

    >>
    >>>>> Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with

    >>
    >>>> Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.

    >>
    >>> Explain why not.

    >>
    >>Most dont bother to complain to telstra, because they know they will just
    >>get the usual fob off.
    >>
    >>> If complaints per SIO on CDMA in the last year were x, and complaints
    >>> per SIO on NextG are y,
    >>> measured over the same period, if y is less than x, then sounds like
    >>> NextG is doing very well

    >>
    >>Only if you dont have a clue about what people do when the service is a
    >>dud.
    >>

    >
    > Have to agree, that most people "on the land" don't complain via the
    > "official" means - they complain to their mates & families, about not
    > only losing CDMA (but the rural cops get to keep it) to a service that
    > doesn't perform anywhere near as well, but about the fact that it's
    > widely perceived that this system is coming in, and there's nothing
    > they can do about it. Michael, do you know anyone outside a capital
    > city to ask what they think of Telstra? And do you know what will
    > happen to this country if everyone outside a capital city decides to
    > give it all up & head to the city? And I don't just mean the kiddies
    > who've watched BB or Idol & seen something better... Someone better
    > get their act together, as while the govt still toadies to Telstra,
    > the country is fubar... Next G is only great for those who previously
    > were not on CDMA...


    Good to see ACCC have banned Telstra from broadcasting their ads "coverage
    everwhere you need it" as these are absolute lies and propoganda issued from
    the office of P Burgess.



    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com




  12. #12
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    [email protected] wrote
    > Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
    >> Michael J <[email protected]> wrote
    >>> Rod Speed <[email protected]> wrote
    >>>> Michael J <[email protected]> wrote


    >>>>>>> But Peter Taylor from Telstra says concerns
    >>>>>>> about the new system are exaggerated.


    >>>>>> Easy to claim. Hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.


    >>>>> Complaints per SIO - pretty easy to measure to start with


    >>>> Doesnt do a damned thing to substantiate that claim.


    >>> Explain why not.


    >> Most dont bother to complain to telstra, because
    >> they know they will just get the usual fob off.


    >>> If complaints per SIO on CDMA in the last year were x, and
    >>> complaints per SIO on NextG are y, measured over the same
    >>> period, if y is less than x, then sounds like NextG is doing very well


    >> Only if you dont have a clue about what people do when the service is a dud.


    > Have to agree, that most people "on the land" don't complain
    > via the "official" means - they complain to their mates & families,
    > about not only losing CDMA (but the rural cops get to keep it)
    > to a service that doesn't perform anywhere near as well, but
    > about the fact that it's widely perceived that this system is
    > coming in, and there's nothing they can do about it.


    And they clearly complain to their pollys in an attempt to stop
    telstra turning the CDMA system off when it is working fine for
    them and they dont see why they should have to change anything
    at their end just because telstra wants to shaft them by closing
    the CDMA system for no good reason for the end users.

    If Coonan had any balls she'd tell telstra that it aint allowed to
    close the CDMA system, ever because there is no reason why
    the end users should have to replace their hardware just because
    telstra wants to gouge them more than they have already.

    > Michael, do you know anyone outside a capital city to ask what they think
    > of Telstra? And do you know what will happen to this country if everyone
    > outside a capital city decides to give it all up & head to the city?


    Thats never going to happen.

    > And I don't just mean the kiddies who've watched BB or Idol &
    > seen something better... Someone better get their act together,
    > as while the govt still toadies to Telstra, the country is fubar...


    Nope.

    > Next G is only great for those who previously were not on CDMA...


    It isnt that great even for them, particularly on the pricing.





  13. #13
    Michael J
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    > they can do about it. Michael, do you know anyone outside a capital
    > city to ask what they think of Telstra? And do you know what will


    Yep, most are grateful for the services Telstra supplies, that no one else
    does.

    Years back I used to go to a little fart of a town called Oaklands in NSW.
    500 people or so (if that).

    Friend there had a property he went to every 6 mths or so.

    TELSTRA supplied an Incontact service to the house - no one else would. Free
    incoming landline.

    Then along came CDMA. No one else within 100 km had ANY coverage.

    So yes, plenty of people in the country are happy that Telstra bothers,
    because no one else does






  14. #14
    Rod Speed
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    Michael J <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> they can do about it. Michael, do you know anyone outside a capital
    >> city to ask what they think of Telstra? And do you know what will

    >
    > Yep, most are grateful for the services Telstra supplies, that no one
    > else does.
    >
    > Years back I used to go to a little fart of a town called Oaklands in
    > NSW. 500 people or so (if that).
    >
    > Friend there had a property he went to every 6 mths or so.
    >
    > TELSTRA supplied an Incontact service to the house - no one else
    > would. Free incoming landline.
    >
    > Then along came CDMA. No one else within 100 km had ANY coverage.
    >
    > So yes, plenty of people in the country are happy that Telstra
    > bothers, because no one else does


    Pity that hardly any of those are happy that the CDMA system is gunna close.





  15. #15
    Alan Parkingtons
    Guest

    Re: Next G complaints not significant: Telstra

    Michael J wrote:
    >> they can do about it. Michael, do you know anyone outside a capital
    >> city to ask what they think of Telstra? And do you know what will

    >
    > Yep, most are grateful for the services Telstra supplies, that no one else
    > does.
    >
    > Years back I used to go to a little fart of a town called Oaklands in NSW.
    > 500 people or so (if that).
    >
    > Friend there had a property he went to every 6 mths or so.
    >
    > TELSTRA supplied an Incontact service to the house - no one else would. Free
    > incoming landline.


    So, they were a GOC then, that was their duty, and we paid for it though
    our taxes.

    Think they'd give a **** now?

    A: No.




  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast