Telstra warns on CDMA

"Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:55:11 in aus.comms.mobile Michael may have written:
>> >>It covers much more than the CDMA territory.
>> >
>> > But it still doesn't cover ALL of the CDMA territory ....
>>
>> Which is irrelevant.
>
> ...not if you're about to lose your one source of mobile coverage.

To you, the individual, its not irrelevant.

to the rest of australia and telstra as an organisation, it is.

---

› See More: Telstra warns on CDMA

Michael <[email protected]> wrote
> Paul Day <[email protected]> wrote
>> Michael <[email protected]> wrote

>>> And GSM doesnt cover everything that AMPS did, nor did CDMA cover everything that AMPS did.

>> Which is why a large number of AMPS BSs were left on for long after
>> CDMA was activated and why the handsets were dual AMPS/CDMA-95, no?

> Sorry,

Liar.

> you've become a bit forgetful in your old age.

Nope.

> AMPS was switched off on a regional basis, not everything went at once.

No one ever said otherwise, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> there was no "piecemeal" closure of individual bases.

No one ever said otherwise, you stupid dunny cleaning ****wit child.

> and when AMPS was completely closed this sentence STILL applied " And GSM doesnt cover everything that AMPS did, nor
> did CDMA cover everything that AMPS did."

So ****ing what ?

Michael <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Paul Day" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 07:55:11 in aus.comms.mobile Michael may have
>> written:
>>>>> It covers much more than the CDMA territory.
>>>>
>>>> But it still doesn't cover ALL of the CDMA territory ....
>>>
>>> Which is irrelevant.
>>
>> ...not if you're about to lose your one source of mobile coverage.
>
> To you, the individual, its not irrelevant.
>
> to the rest of australia and telstra as an organisation, it is.

Bare faced pig ignorant lie.

And what matters is what is what is relevant to the ACMA anyway.