Fast broadband: Telstra the only option

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> <nothing of any consequence>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep trying Spudley.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're sounding more and more like your hero Roddles, every day.
>>>>> Only a few macros away.
>>>>
>>>> And you're sounding more and more like Nigel Howe every day.
>>>> Only a few needles away.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know that, are you his supplier?
>>
>> According to Rod, yep. Why? Are you looking for a better deal than you're
>> currently getting?
>>
>>> Anyway, that was an IKWYABWAI comeback if I've ever heard one. You silly
>>> childish boy.
>>
>> Silly, childish boy? Wow. That hurt..........
>> Any other pathetic taunts you want to throw my way, hypocrite?
>>
>
> You call that a "taunt",

No. I called it a 'pathetic taunt'. Please learn to read what was posted.

> I call it a fact.

You would, but then again, who really cares what you think about anything?
So far in this one thread you have proven yourself to be a hypocrite,
semi-literate, a liar and a general all-round dickhead with selective
memory. Other threads you have attempted to participate in have proven much
the same thing, so it doesn't appear to be an isolated event.

Poor Spudley.

--
Kwyj.

---

› See More: Fast broadband: Telstra the only option

harryoid wrote:
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> Besides, myopic one, I inferred that taunts and profanity (abuse) were
>>>>> the stock and trade of a person with poor and unbalanced debating
>>>>> skills.
>>>> So you admit you have poor and unbalanced debating skills.
>>>> Thanks for clearing that up.
>>>>
>>> Then you misread as usual.
>> Nope.
>>
>>> No surprises there.
>>>
>> Your basic premise is that taunts and profanity are indicative of poor
>> debating skills. You made that point while at the same time attempting to
>> taunt me with words such as 'myopic' and 'unimportant'
>> Try putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with something other than your
>> foot wedged firmly in your mouth.
>>
>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are you
>> ****wit?
>
> "Why does a retarded ****wit keep asking me stupid questions! Is what I
> keep asking myself." - Steve "Spudley" Campbell, 18/01/06.

Hehe... You guys.


--
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they
are free - Goethe

"Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>
>>> Try just for once, to reply without using abuse,
>>
>> **** yourself, wankstain.
>>
>>> I'd like to see if it's possible for you to do so without resorting
>>> to your usual catch bag of diatribe.
>>
>> It's quite possible, but why waste big words on a ****wit that
>> clearly can't even comprehend them? You're starting to make Nigel
>> Howe and EnjoyDialup look like members of Mensa.
>> Want to shoot yourself in the foot one more time for us Spudley?
>
> Should he remove his foot from his mouth first?

Most definitely not.

--
Kwyj.

"Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>> you ****wit?
>>
>> "Why does a retarded ****wit keep asking me stupid questions! Is
>> what I keep asking myself." - Steve "Spudley" Campbell, 18/01/06.
>
> http://snipurl.com/spudley

He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.

--
Kwyj.

"Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>> you ****wit?
>>>
>>
>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>
> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>

Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the turd",
Kwyj. No go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with honour, doh boy!

> --
> Kwyj.
>

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>
>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>
>
> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the turd",
> Kwyj. No go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with honour, doh boy!

Oh. That hurt........

>
>> --
>> Kwyj.

Why did you quote my sig?

--
Kwyj.

"Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>
>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the turd",
>> Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with honour, doh
>> boy!
>
> Oh. That hurt........
>
>>
>>> --
>>> Kwyj.
>
> Why did you quote my sig?
>

Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?

Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut in the
turd, you.

> --
> Kwyj.
>

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>
>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the turd",
>>> Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with honour, doh
>>> boy!
>>
>> Oh. That hurt........
>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kwyj.
>>
>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>
>
> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?

Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and see if it
finally sinks in.

>
> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut in
> the turd, you.
>
>> --
>> Kwyj.
>>

Why did you quote my sig?

--
Kwyj.

"Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>
>>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the
>>>> turd", Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with
>>>> honour, doh boy!
>>>
>>> Oh. That hurt........
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>
>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>
>>
>> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?
>
> Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
> Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and see if
> it finally sinks in.
>
>>

The only thing I quoted of your was "smartest peanut in the turd", that's
what the "" < Quote marks are there for, numbnuts.
Anything else of yours and that as well, is just superfluous garbage. As it
always is.

Now go play with your dictionary.

>> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut in
>> the turd, you.
>>
>>> --
>>> Kwyj.
>>>
>
> Why did you quote my sig?
>
> --
> Kwyj.
^^^^^^^

Maybe you are referring to this piece of rubbish just above here. In which
case you haven't heard of in-line posting, and are trying to make a stupid
point out of nothing .... As usual.

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the
>>>>> turd", Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with
>>>>> honour, doh boy!
>>>>
>>>> Oh. That hurt........
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>
>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?
>>
>> Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
>> Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and see if
>> it finally sinks in.
>>
>>>
>
> The only thing I quoted of your was "smartest peanut in the turd"

The *ONLY* thing? Ahh. A liar as well as a fool. Quite a combination you
have going there.

>, that's what the "" < Quote marks are there for, numbnuts.

Yep. That same indentation also appeared when you quoted my sig, even though
you deny it.

> Anything else of yours and that as well, is just superfluous garbage. As
> it always is.
>
> Now go play with your dictionary.
>
>>> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut in
>>> the turd, you.
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>
>>
>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>
>> --
>> Kwyj.
> ^^^^^^^
>
> Maybe you are referring to this piece of rubbish just above here.

<sigh>
Yes Spudley. That is what is commonly refered to as a 'sig'..........
So now you *don't* deny quoting my sig? Which voice am I talking to at the
moment, Spudley? The one that *only* quoted ""smartest peanut in the turd",
or the one that quoted my sig?

> In which case you haven't heard of in-line posting,

I most certainly have, but most decent newsreaders (and decent posters) have
the ability to remove a sig from what is quoted. That's fairly standard
practice when posting to usenet.

You're not really up with this whole, new-fangled 'internet' thing, are you
Spudley. Perhaps you'd better stick to your crayons and colouring books. Try
to stay inside the lines. There's a good little fella.

--
Kwyj.

"Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the
>>>>>> turd", Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with
>>>>>> honour, doh boy!
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh. That hurt........
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?
>>>
>>> Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
>>> Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and see
>>> if it finally sinks in.
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> The only thing I quoted of your was "smartest peanut in the turd"
>
> The *ONLY* thing? Ahh. A liar as well as a fool. Quite a combination you
> have going there.
>

Boy, you would have to be, the most pedantic name calling turd on the
planet, bar none, well maybe with the exception of Rod Speed.


>>, that's what the "" < Quote marks are there for, numbnuts.
>
> Yep. That same indentation also appeared when you quoted my sig, even
> though you deny it.
>
>> Anything else of yours and that as well, is just superfluous garbage. As
>> it always is.
>>
>> Now go play with your dictionary.
>>
>>>> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut in
>>>> the turd, you.
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kwyj.
>> ^^^^^^^
>>
>> Maybe you are referring to this piece of rubbish just above here.
>
> <sigh>
> Yes Spudley. That is what is commonly refered to as a 'sig'..........
> So now you *don't* deny quoting my sig? Which voice am I talking to at the
> moment, Spudley? The one that *only* quoted ""smartest peanut in the
> turd", or the one that quoted my sig?
>
>> In which case you haven't heard of in-line posting,
>
> I most certainly have, but most decent newsreaders (and decent posters)
> have the ability to remove a sig from what is quoted. That's fairly
> standard practice when posting to usenet.
>

That's not a standard function of outlook express, learn to live with it
peanut boy. Or complain to Bill for not meeting your personal requirements..

> You're not really up with this whole, new-fangled 'internet' thing, are
> you Spudley. Perhaps you'd better stick to your crayons and colouring
> books. Try to stay inside the lines. There's a good little fella.
>

Says the petulant child while stamping his widdle feet, because someone
won't comply with his erectile dysfunctional standards...

I don't consider what's below here to be a quote "" , I consider it to be
part of my inline posting method, numbnuts, learn to live with it or go
stick your head up a dead bears rectum, you're picky little pedant peanut
boy.

> --
> Kwyj.
>

"Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>>>> Try just for once, to reply without using abuse,
>>>>
>>>> **** yourself, wankstain.
>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to see if it's possible for you to do so without resorting
>>>>> to your usual catch bag of diatribe.
>>>>
>>>> It's quite possible, but why waste big words on a ****wit that
>>>> clearly can't even comprehend them? You're starting to make Nigel
>>>> Howe and EnjoyDialup look like members of Mensa.
>>>> Want to shoot yourself in the foot one more time for us Spudley?
>>>
>>> Should he remove his foot from his mouth first?
>>>
>>
>> GAGF, you constipated cretin.
>
> Ahh, Spuddles; still the master of the witless riposte I see. Do you have
> any new material my sycophantic arse sniffing neophyte? Or are you simply
> content to regurgitate tired and lacklustre prose plagiarised from other,
> slightly less brain-damaged morons than yourself?
>

Blaming others for your constipation won't help.

You mistake it all, for me not giving a rats arse about you enough to bother
writing more.
And if you are looking for wit, look at Kwyjibo as a half wit.
Unfortunately, the two you of together still don't equal 1 full wit. Sad
really.

> --
> Cerberus
>
> None Shall Pass!

Wheat Bran may help.

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:r7%[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing, are
>>>>>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the
>>>>>>> turd", Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with
>>>>>>> honour, doh boy!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh. That hurt........
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?
>>>>
>>>> Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
>>>> Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and see
>>>> if it finally sinks in.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> The only thing I quoted of your was "smartest peanut in the turd"
>>
>> The *ONLY* thing? Ahh. A liar as well as a fool. Quite a combination you
>> have going there.
>>
>
> Boy, you would have to be, the most pedantic name calling turd on the
> planet,

Catching you out in a lie is not an act of pedantry, stupid.

> bar none, well maybe with the exception of Rod Speed.
>
>
>>>, that's what the "" < Quote marks are there for, numbnuts.
>>
>> Yep. That same indentation also appeared when you quoted my sig, even
>> though you deny it.
>>
>>> Anything else of yours and that as well, is just superfluous garbage. As
>>> it always is.
>>>
>>> Now go play with your dictionary.
>>>
>>>>> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut
>>>>> in the turd, you.
>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kwyj.
>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>
>>> Maybe you are referring to this piece of rubbish just above here.
>>
>> <sigh>
>> Yes Spudley. That is what is commonly refered to as a 'sig'..........
>> So now you *don't* deny quoting my sig? Which voice am I talking to at
>> the moment, Spudley? The one that *only* quoted ""smartest peanut in the
>> turd", or the one that quoted my sig?
>>
>>> In which case you haven't heard of in-line posting,
>>
>> I most certainly have, but most decent newsreaders (and decent posters)
>> have the ability to remove a sig from what is quoted. That's fairly
>> standard practice when posting to usenet.
>>
>
> That's not a standard function of outlook express,

So you admit you are too stupid to do it for yourself. Thanks for clearing
that up.

> learn to live with it peanut boy. Or complain to Bill for not meeting
> your personal requirements..

Nothing to do with Mr Gates that you were born with a mental deficiency. I
guess I could blame his company for not developing AI quickly enough to help
you out, but I don't think even the most advanced AI systems could assist
someone with such a severe handicap.
>
>> You're not really up with this whole, new-fangled 'internet' thing, are
>> you Spudley. Perhaps you'd better stick to your crayons and colouring
>> books. Try to stay inside the lines. There's a good little fella.
>>
>
> Says the petulant child while stamping his widdle feet,

Not at all. Just pointing out your lies and obvious stupidity.

> because someone won't comply with his erectile dysfunctional standards...
>
> I don't consider what's below here to be a quote ""

What you consider it to be is irrelevant. You most definitely quoted my sig.
That's an undisputable fact ,unless you want to rewrite the dictionary to
suit your own personal definition of the word 'quote'.

> I consider it to be part of my inline posting method,

Again - Your thoughts are irrelevant when they conflict with the generally
accepted definitions of words within the English language.

> numbnuts, learn to live with it or go stick your head up a dead bears
> rectum, you're picky little pedant peanut boy.

Hmmm. 'peanut boy', 'petulant child', 'erectile dysfunction', 'numbnuts', '
picky little pedant peanut boy'......
When we read those in combination with your earlier claim that " taunts and
profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with poor and
unbalanced debating skills." should we infer that you concede you are not
very good at this whole 'debating' thing?

Want to take another shot? You might be able to hit both feet this time.

>
>> --
>> Kwyj.

Why did you quote my sig?

--
Kwyj.

"Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:r7%[email protected]...
>>
>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing,
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the
>>>>>>>> turd", Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with
>>>>>>>> honour, doh boy!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh. That hurt........
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?
>>>>>
>>>>> Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
>>>>> Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and see
>>>>> if it finally sinks in.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only thing I quoted of your was "smartest peanut in the turd"
>>>
>>> The *ONLY* thing? Ahh. A liar as well as a fool. Quite a combination you
>>> have going there.
>>>
>>
>> Boy, you would have to be, the most pedantic name calling turd on the
>> planet,
>
> Catching you out in a lie is not an act of pedantry, stupid.
>
>> bar none, well maybe with the exception of Rod Speed.
>>
>>
>>>>, that's what the "" < Quote marks are there for, numbnuts.
>>>
>>> Yep. That same indentation also appeared when you quoted my sig, even
>>> though you deny it.
>>>
>>>> Anything else of yours and that as well, is just superfluous garbage.
>>>> As it always is.
>>>>
>>>> Now go play with your dictionary.
>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut
>>>>>> in the turd, you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you are referring to this piece of rubbish just above here.
>>>
>>> <sigh>
>>> Yes Spudley. That is what is commonly refered to as a 'sig'..........
>>> So now you *don't* deny quoting my sig? Which voice am I talking to at
>>> the moment, Spudley? The one that *only* quoted ""smartest peanut in the
>>> turd", or the one that quoted my sig?
>>>
>>>> In which case you haven't heard of in-line posting,
>>>
>>> I most certainly have, but most decent newsreaders (and decent posters)
>>> have the ability to remove a sig from what is quoted. That's fairly
>>> standard practice when posting to usenet.
>>>
>>
>> That's not a standard function of outlook express,
>
> So you admit you are too stupid to do it for yourself. Thanks for clearing
> that up.
>

No! you retarded monkey throwback.

>> learn to live with it peanut boy. Or complain to Bill for not meeting
>> your personal requirements..
>
> Nothing to do with Mr Gates that you were born with a mental deficiency. I
> guess I could blame his company for not developing AI quickly enough to
> help you out, but I don't think even the most advanced AI systems could
> assist someone with such a severe handicap.
>>

That coming from a retarded monkey thowback with his head stuck firmly up
his arse.

>>> You're not really up with this whole, new-fangled 'internet' thing, are
>>> you Spudley. Perhaps you'd better stick to your crayons and colouring
>>> books. Try to stay inside the lines. There's a good little fella.
>>>
>>
>> Says the petulant child while stamping his widdle feet,
>
> Not at all. Just pointing out your lies and obvious stupidity.
>

More BS from the retarded monkey throwback with his head firmly planted up
his arse.

>> because someone won't comply with his erectile dysfunctional standards...
>>
>> I don't consider what's below here to be a quote ""
>
> What you consider it to be is irrelevant. You most definitely quoted my
> sig. That's an undisputable fact ,unless you want to rewrite the
> dictionary to suit your own personal definition of the word 'quote'.
>

You define it as a quoting your sig, not I. I define it as inline posting
and not worthy of comment unlike a pedant monkey boy with his head planted
firmly up his are like you.

>> I consider it to be part of my inline posting method,
>
> Again - Your thoughts are irrelevant when they conflict with the generally
> accepted definitions of words within the English language.
>

Your thoughts are strange indeed.

>> numbnuts, learn to live with it or go stick your head up a dead bears
>> rectum, you're picky little pedant peanut boy.
>
> Hmmm. 'peanut boy', 'petulant child', 'erectile dysfunction', 'numbnuts',
> ' picky little pedant peanut boy'......
> When we read those in combination with your earlier claim that " taunts
> and profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with poor and
> unbalanced debating skills." should we infer that you concede you are not
> very good at this whole 'debating' thing?
>

They seem to be the only things you understand, so I have included them here
for your edification and general understanding. I have concluded that they
are the basis of your basic conversational skills so they needed to be
included to get the message across to someone like you.

> Want to take another shot? You might be able to hit both feet this time.
>
>>
>>> --
>>> Kwyj.
>
> Why did you quote my sig?
>
> --
> Kwyj.
>

I let OE do it for me, there is no need for me to consciously exclude what
you consider to be a quote.
ps,
I notice that there are others who do the same. So go jump on your little
horse and ride them over it too.
Then you can have a go at them as well, for not thinking of these pithy
little things the way you do.

If you don't like your sig (apparently quoted back to you), then remove the
sig, you simple dimwit.

"-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:r7%[email protected]...
>>>
>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>
>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "-=Spudley=-" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Cerberus" <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> message news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>> "harryoid" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Kwyjibo" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:[email protected]...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not very good at this whole 'logical argument' thing,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you ****wit?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://snipurl.com/spudley
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He's definitely not the smartest peanut in the turd.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks goodness for that, But you are the "smartest peanut in the
>>>>>>>>> turd", Kwyj. Now go wear that little schoolyard taunt badge with
>>>>>>>>> honour, doh boy!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh. That hurt........
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since when has "smartest peanut in the turd", been your sig?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Poor Spudley. Your inability to read is making you look stupid again.
>>>>>> Try re-reading my post again. Maybe get a grown up to help you and
>>>>>> see if it finally sinks in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only thing I quoted of your was "smartest peanut in the turd"
>>>>
>>>> The *ONLY* thing? Ahh. A liar as well as a fool. Quite a combination
>>>> you have going there.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Boy, you would have to be, the most pedantic name calling turd on the
>>> planet,
>>
>> Catching you out in a lie is not an act of pedantry, stupid.
>>
>>> bar none, well maybe with the exception of Rod Speed.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>, that's what the "" < Quote marks are there for, numbnuts.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. That same indentation also appeared when you quoted my sig, even
>>>> though you deny it.
>>>>
>>>>> Anything else of yours and that as well, is just superfluous garbage.
>>>>> As it always is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now go play with your dictionary.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whatever floats that silly boat of yours. You smartest little peanut
>>>>>>> in the turd, you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Kwyj.
>>>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you are referring to this piece of rubbish just above here.
>>>>
>>>> <sigh>
>>>> Yes Spudley. That is what is commonly refered to as a 'sig'..........
>>>> So now you *don't* deny quoting my sig? Which voice am I talking to at
>>>> the moment, Spudley? The one that *only* quoted ""smartest peanut in
>>>> the turd", or the one that quoted my sig?
>>>>
>>>>> In which case you haven't heard of in-line posting,
>>>>
>>>> I most certainly have, but most decent newsreaders (and decent posters)
>>>> have the ability to remove a sig from what is quoted. That's fairly
>>>> standard practice when posting to usenet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's not a standard function of outlook express,
>>
>> So you admit you are too stupid to do it for yourself. Thanks for
>> clearing that up.
>>
>
> No! you retarded monkey throwback.

" taunts and profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with
poor and unbalanced debating skills."
Hehe.

>
>>> learn to live with it peanut boy. Or complain to Bill for not meeting
>>> your personal requirements..
>>
>> Nothing to do with Mr Gates that you were born with a mental deficiency.
>> I guess I could blame his company for not developing AI quickly enough to
>> help you out, but I don't think even the most advanced AI systems could
>> assist someone with such a severe handicap.
>>>
>
> That coming from a retarded monkey thowback with his head stuck firmly up
> his arse.

" taunts and profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with
poor and unbalanced debating skills."
This just keeps getting better and better.

>
>>>> You're not really up with this whole, new-fangled 'internet' thing, are
>>>> you Spudley. Perhaps you'd better stick to your crayons and colouring
>>>> books. Try to stay inside the lines. There's a good little fella.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Says the petulant child while stamping his widdle feet,
>>
>> Not at all. Just pointing out your lies and obvious stupidity.
>>
>
> More BS from the retarded monkey throwback with his head firmly planted up
> his arse.

" taunts and profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with
poor and unbalanced debating skills."
Oh boy. The sheer level of idiocy within your posts is amazing.

>
>>> because someone won't comply with his erectile dysfunctional
>>> standards...
>>>
>>> I don't consider what's below here to be a quote ""
>>
>> What you consider it to be is irrelevant. You most definitely quoted my
>> sig. That's an undisputable fact ,unless you want to rewrite the
>> dictionary to suit your own personal definition of the word 'quote'.
>>
>
> You define it as a quoting your sig, not I. I define it as inline posting
> and not worthy of comment unlike a pedant monkey boy with his head planted
> firmly up his are like you.

" taunts and profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with
poor and unbalanced debating skills."
I presume you meant that to apply equally to misspelt profanity?


>
>>> I consider it to be part of my inline posting method,
>>
>> Again - Your thoughts are irrelevant when they conflict with the
>> generally accepted definitions of words within the English language.
>>
>
> Your thoughts are strange indeed.

Huh? We were discussing *your* thoughts. Please try to keep up.

>
>>> numbnuts, learn to live with it or go stick your head up a dead bears
>>> rectum, you're picky little pedant peanut boy.
>>
>> Hmmm. 'peanut boy', 'petulant child', 'erectile dysfunction', 'numbnuts',
>> ' picky little pedant peanut boy'......
>> When we read those in combination with your earlier claim that " taunts
>> and profanity (abuse) were the stock and trade of a person with poor and
>> unbalanced debating skills." should we infer that you concede you are not
>> very good at this whole 'debating' thing?
>>
>
> They seem to be the only things you understand,

Not at all. I also understand that you are a liar, a hypocrite and a
general, all-round dullard of the lowest order.

> so I have included them here for your edification and general
> understanding. I have concluded that they are the basis of your basic
> conversational skills so they needed to be included to get the message
> across to someone like you.
>
>> Want to take another shot? You might be able to hit both feet this time.
>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Kwyj.
>>
>> Why did you quote my sig?
>>
>> --
>> Kwyj.

Why did you quote my sig?

>>
>
> I let OE do it for me, there is no need for me to consciously exclude what
> you consider to be a quote.

*I* don't consider it to be a quote, Spudley. The entire English speaking
world considers it as such.

> ps,
> I notice

You wouldn't notice if your arse was on fire.

> that there are others who do the same.

Not in response to me.

> So go jump on your little horse and ride them over it too.

How can I ride them if I am on my horse? Surely I can't ride a horse and a
person at the same time.
Oh - wait a sec. You said 'little horse'. A jackass is sort of like a little
horse. I could probably ride a person and a jackass concurrently, as I have
demostrated within this thread.

--
Kwyj.